Cargando…
Panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms
BACKGROUND: RT-qPCR is the current recommended laboratory method to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 acute infection, several factors such as requirement of special equipment, time consuming, high cost and skilled staff limit the use of these techniques. A more rapid and high-throughput method is essential. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7561603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33160179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104659 |
_version_ | 1783595304114716672 |
---|---|
author | Linares, Manuel Pérez-Tanoira, Ramón Carrero, Ana Romanyk, Juan Pérez-García, Felipe Gómez-Herruz, Peña Arroyo, Teresa Cuadros, Juan |
author_facet | Linares, Manuel Pérez-Tanoira, Ramón Carrero, Ana Romanyk, Juan Pérez-García, Felipe Gómez-Herruz, Peña Arroyo, Teresa Cuadros, Juan |
author_sort | Linares, Manuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: RT-qPCR is the current recommended laboratory method to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 acute infection, several factors such as requirement of special equipment, time consuming, high cost and skilled staff limit the use of these techniques. A more rapid and high-throughput method is essential. METHODS: We analyzed clinical data and nasopharyngeal samples, collected during September 2020, from patients attended at the emergency department of a secondary hospital and in two primary healthcare centers in Madrid. The performance of the Panbio™ COVID-19 AG Rapid Test Device for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen was compared to RT-qPCR. RESULTS: 255 nasopharyngeal swabs, including 150 from the emergency department and 105 from primary helthcare centers, were tested. 184 patients were symptomatic (72.1 %). Amongst the 60 positive RT-qPCR samples, 40 were detected by the rapid antigen test, given an overall sensitivity of 73.3 %. All the samples detected positive with the rapid antigen test were also positive with RT-qPCR. The median cycle threshold was 23.28 (IQR 18.5–30.16). Patients with less than seven days onset of symptoms showed a higher viral load, and sensitivity for rapid antigen test (86.5 %), compared to those with more days (sensitivity of 53.8 %)(p < 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The rapid antigen test evaluated in this study showed a high sensitivity and specificity in samples obtained during the first week of symptoms and with high viral loads. This assay seems to be an effective strategy for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic for the rapid identification and isolation of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7561603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75616032020-10-16 Panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms Linares, Manuel Pérez-Tanoira, Ramón Carrero, Ana Romanyk, Juan Pérez-García, Felipe Gómez-Herruz, Peña Arroyo, Teresa Cuadros, Juan J Clin Virol Short Communication BACKGROUND: RT-qPCR is the current recommended laboratory method to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 acute infection, several factors such as requirement of special equipment, time consuming, high cost and skilled staff limit the use of these techniques. A more rapid and high-throughput method is essential. METHODS: We analyzed clinical data and nasopharyngeal samples, collected during September 2020, from patients attended at the emergency department of a secondary hospital and in two primary healthcare centers in Madrid. The performance of the Panbio™ COVID-19 AG Rapid Test Device for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen was compared to RT-qPCR. RESULTS: 255 nasopharyngeal swabs, including 150 from the emergency department and 105 from primary helthcare centers, were tested. 184 patients were symptomatic (72.1 %). Amongst the 60 positive RT-qPCR samples, 40 were detected by the rapid antigen test, given an overall sensitivity of 73.3 %. All the samples detected positive with the rapid antigen test were also positive with RT-qPCR. The median cycle threshold was 23.28 (IQR 18.5–30.16). Patients with less than seven days onset of symptoms showed a higher viral load, and sensitivity for rapid antigen test (86.5 %), compared to those with more days (sensitivity of 53.8 %)(p < 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The rapid antigen test evaluated in this study showed a high sensitivity and specificity in samples obtained during the first week of symptoms and with high viral loads. This assay seems to be an effective strategy for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic for the rapid identification and isolation of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020-12 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7561603/ /pubmed/33160179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104659 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Linares, Manuel Pérez-Tanoira, Ramón Carrero, Ana Romanyk, Juan Pérez-García, Felipe Gómez-Herruz, Peña Arroyo, Teresa Cuadros, Juan Panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms |
title | Panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms |
title_full | Panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms |
title_fullStr | Panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms |
title_full_unstemmed | Panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms |
title_short | Panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms |
title_sort | panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose sars-cov-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7561603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33160179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linaresmanuel panbioantigenrapidtestisreliabletodiagnosesarscov2infectioninthefirst7daysaftertheonsetofsymptoms AT pereztanoiraramon panbioantigenrapidtestisreliabletodiagnosesarscov2infectioninthefirst7daysaftertheonsetofsymptoms AT carreroana panbioantigenrapidtestisreliabletodiagnosesarscov2infectioninthefirst7daysaftertheonsetofsymptoms AT romanykjuan panbioantigenrapidtestisreliabletodiagnosesarscov2infectioninthefirst7daysaftertheonsetofsymptoms AT perezgarciafelipe panbioantigenrapidtestisreliabletodiagnosesarscov2infectioninthefirst7daysaftertheonsetofsymptoms AT gomezherruzpena panbioantigenrapidtestisreliabletodiagnosesarscov2infectioninthefirst7daysaftertheonsetofsymptoms AT arroyoteresa panbioantigenrapidtestisreliabletodiagnosesarscov2infectioninthefirst7daysaftertheonsetofsymptoms AT cuadrosjuan panbioantigenrapidtestisreliabletodiagnosesarscov2infectioninthefirst7daysaftertheonsetofsymptoms |