Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C virus screening, and subsequent monitoring or treatment among pregnant women in the Netherlands
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diagnosed chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among pregnant women in the Netherlands is 0.26%, yet many cases remain undiagnosed. HCV screening and treatment of pregnant HCV carriers could reduce the burden of disease and limit vertical transmission from mother t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7561704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33064259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01236-2 |
_version_ | 1783595320124375040 |
---|---|
author | Eijsink, Job F. H. Al Khayat, Mohamed N. M. T. Boersma, Cornelis ter Horst, Peter G. J. Wilschut, Jan C. Postma, Maarten J. |
author_facet | Eijsink, Job F. H. Al Khayat, Mohamed N. M. T. Boersma, Cornelis ter Horst, Peter G. J. Wilschut, Jan C. Postma, Maarten J. |
author_sort | Eijsink, Job F. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diagnosed chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among pregnant women in the Netherlands is 0.26%, yet many cases remain undiagnosed. HCV screening and treatment of pregnant HCV carriers could reduce the burden of disease and limit vertical transmission from mother to child. We assessed the impact of HCV screening and subsequent treatment with new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) among pregnant women in the Netherlands. METHODS: An HCV natural history Markov transition state model was developed, to evaluate the public-health and economic impact of HCV screening and treatment. Besides all 179,000 pregnant women in the Netherlands (cohort 1), we modelled 3 further cohorts: all 79,000 first-time pregnant women (cohort 2), 33,000 pregnant migrant women (cohort 3) and 16,000 first-time pregnant migrant women (cohort 4). Each cohort was analyzed in various scenarios: i no intervention, i.e., the current practice, ii screen-and-treat, i.e., the most extensive approach involving treatment of all individuals found HCV-positive, and iii screen-and-treat/monitor, i.e., a strategy involving treatment of symptomatic (F1–F4) patients and follow-up of asymptomatic (F0) HCV carriers with subsequent treatment only at progression. RESULTS: For all cohorts, comparison between scenarios (ii) and (i) resulted in ICERs between €9,306 and €10,173 per QALY gained and 5 year budget impacts varying between €6,283,830 and €19,220,405. For all cohorts, comparison between scenarios (iii) and (i) resulted in ICERs between €1,739 and €2,749 per QALY gained and budget impacts varying between €1,468,670 and €5,607,556. For all cohorts, the ICERs (scenario iii versus ii) involved in delayed treatment of asymptomatic (F0) HCV carriers varied between €56,607 and €56,892, well above the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €20,000 per QALY gained and even above a threshold of €50,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: Universal screening for HCV among all pregnant women in the Netherlands is cost-effective. However, it would be reasonable to consider smaller risk groups in view of the budget impact of the intervention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10198-020-01236-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7561704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75617042020-10-16 Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C virus screening, and subsequent monitoring or treatment among pregnant women in the Netherlands Eijsink, Job F. H. Al Khayat, Mohamed N. M. T. Boersma, Cornelis ter Horst, Peter G. J. Wilschut, Jan C. Postma, Maarten J. Eur J Health Econ Original Paper BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diagnosed chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among pregnant women in the Netherlands is 0.26%, yet many cases remain undiagnosed. HCV screening and treatment of pregnant HCV carriers could reduce the burden of disease and limit vertical transmission from mother to child. We assessed the impact of HCV screening and subsequent treatment with new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) among pregnant women in the Netherlands. METHODS: An HCV natural history Markov transition state model was developed, to evaluate the public-health and economic impact of HCV screening and treatment. Besides all 179,000 pregnant women in the Netherlands (cohort 1), we modelled 3 further cohorts: all 79,000 first-time pregnant women (cohort 2), 33,000 pregnant migrant women (cohort 3) and 16,000 first-time pregnant migrant women (cohort 4). Each cohort was analyzed in various scenarios: i no intervention, i.e., the current practice, ii screen-and-treat, i.e., the most extensive approach involving treatment of all individuals found HCV-positive, and iii screen-and-treat/monitor, i.e., a strategy involving treatment of symptomatic (F1–F4) patients and follow-up of asymptomatic (F0) HCV carriers with subsequent treatment only at progression. RESULTS: For all cohorts, comparison between scenarios (ii) and (i) resulted in ICERs between €9,306 and €10,173 per QALY gained and 5 year budget impacts varying between €6,283,830 and €19,220,405. For all cohorts, comparison between scenarios (iii) and (i) resulted in ICERs between €1,739 and €2,749 per QALY gained and budget impacts varying between €1,468,670 and €5,607,556. For all cohorts, the ICERs (scenario iii versus ii) involved in delayed treatment of asymptomatic (F0) HCV carriers varied between €56,607 and €56,892, well above the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €20,000 per QALY gained and even above a threshold of €50,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: Universal screening for HCV among all pregnant women in the Netherlands is cost-effective. However, it would be reasonable to consider smaller risk groups in view of the budget impact of the intervention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10198-020-01236-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7561704/ /pubmed/33064259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01236-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Eijsink, Job F. H. Al Khayat, Mohamed N. M. T. Boersma, Cornelis ter Horst, Peter G. J. Wilschut, Jan C. Postma, Maarten J. Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C virus screening, and subsequent monitoring or treatment among pregnant women in the Netherlands |
title | Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C virus screening, and subsequent monitoring or treatment among pregnant women in the Netherlands |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C virus screening, and subsequent monitoring or treatment among pregnant women in the Netherlands |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C virus screening, and subsequent monitoring or treatment among pregnant women in the Netherlands |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C virus screening, and subsequent monitoring or treatment among pregnant women in the Netherlands |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C virus screening, and subsequent monitoring or treatment among pregnant women in the Netherlands |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of hepatitis c virus screening, and subsequent monitoring or treatment among pregnant women in the netherlands |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7561704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33064259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01236-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eijsinkjobfh costeffectivenessofhepatitiscvirusscreeningandsubsequentmonitoringortreatmentamongpregnantwomeninthenetherlands AT alkhayatmohamednmt costeffectivenessofhepatitiscvirusscreeningandsubsequentmonitoringortreatmentamongpregnantwomeninthenetherlands AT boersmacornelis costeffectivenessofhepatitiscvirusscreeningandsubsequentmonitoringortreatmentamongpregnantwomeninthenetherlands AT terhorstpetergj costeffectivenessofhepatitiscvirusscreeningandsubsequentmonitoringortreatmentamongpregnantwomeninthenetherlands AT wilschutjanc costeffectivenessofhepatitiscvirusscreeningandsubsequentmonitoringortreatmentamongpregnantwomeninthenetherlands AT postmamaartenj costeffectivenessofhepatitiscvirusscreeningandsubsequentmonitoringortreatmentamongpregnantwomeninthenetherlands |