Cargando…

Determining the Molecular Background of Endometrial Receptivity in Adenomyosis

Background: Adenomyosis is a gynaecological condition with limited evidence of negative impact to endometrial receptivity. It is commonly associated with endometriosis, which has been shown to alter endometrial expression patterns. Therefore, the candidate genes identified in endometriosis could ser...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prašnikar, Erika, Kunej, Tanja, Repnik, Katja, Potočnik, Uroš, Knez, Jure, Kovačič, Borut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32933042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom10091311
_version_ 1783595438088126464
author Prašnikar, Erika
Kunej, Tanja
Repnik, Katja
Potočnik, Uroš
Knez, Jure
Kovačič, Borut
author_facet Prašnikar, Erika
Kunej, Tanja
Repnik, Katja
Potočnik, Uroš
Knez, Jure
Kovačič, Borut
author_sort Prašnikar, Erika
collection PubMed
description Background: Adenomyosis is a gynaecological condition with limited evidence of negative impact to endometrial receptivity. It is commonly associated with endometriosis, which has been shown to alter endometrial expression patterns. Therefore, the candidate genes identified in endometriosis could serve as a source to study endometrial function in adenomyosis. Methods: Transcripts/proteins associated with endometrial receptivity in women with adenomyosis or endometriosis and healthy women were obtained from publications and their nomenclature was adopted according to the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC). Retrieved genes were analysed for enriched pathways using Cytoscape/Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) and Reactome tools to prioritise candidates for endometrial receptivity. These were used for validation on women with (n = 9) and without (n = 13) adenomyosis. Results: Functional enrichment analysis of 173, 42 and 151 genes associated with endometriosis, adenomyosis and healthy women, respectively, revealed signalling by interleukins and interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signalling pathways, from which annotated LIF, JUNB, IL6, FOS, IL10 and SOCS3 were prioritised. Selected genes showed downregulated expression levels in adenomyosis compared to the control group, but without statistical significance. Conclusion: This is the first integrative study providing putative candidate genes and pathways characterising endometrial receptivity in women with adenomyosis in comparison to healthy women and women with endometriosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7563201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75632012020-10-27 Determining the Molecular Background of Endometrial Receptivity in Adenomyosis Prašnikar, Erika Kunej, Tanja Repnik, Katja Potočnik, Uroš Knez, Jure Kovačič, Borut Biomolecules Article Background: Adenomyosis is a gynaecological condition with limited evidence of negative impact to endometrial receptivity. It is commonly associated with endometriosis, which has been shown to alter endometrial expression patterns. Therefore, the candidate genes identified in endometriosis could serve as a source to study endometrial function in adenomyosis. Methods: Transcripts/proteins associated with endometrial receptivity in women with adenomyosis or endometriosis and healthy women were obtained from publications and their nomenclature was adopted according to the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC). Retrieved genes were analysed for enriched pathways using Cytoscape/Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) and Reactome tools to prioritise candidates for endometrial receptivity. These were used for validation on women with (n = 9) and without (n = 13) adenomyosis. Results: Functional enrichment analysis of 173, 42 and 151 genes associated with endometriosis, adenomyosis and healthy women, respectively, revealed signalling by interleukins and interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signalling pathways, from which annotated LIF, JUNB, IL6, FOS, IL10 and SOCS3 were prioritised. Selected genes showed downregulated expression levels in adenomyosis compared to the control group, but without statistical significance. Conclusion: This is the first integrative study providing putative candidate genes and pathways characterising endometrial receptivity in women with adenomyosis in comparison to healthy women and women with endometriosis. MDPI 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7563201/ /pubmed/32933042 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom10091311 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Prašnikar, Erika
Kunej, Tanja
Repnik, Katja
Potočnik, Uroš
Knez, Jure
Kovačič, Borut
Determining the Molecular Background of Endometrial Receptivity in Adenomyosis
title Determining the Molecular Background of Endometrial Receptivity in Adenomyosis
title_full Determining the Molecular Background of Endometrial Receptivity in Adenomyosis
title_fullStr Determining the Molecular Background of Endometrial Receptivity in Adenomyosis
title_full_unstemmed Determining the Molecular Background of Endometrial Receptivity in Adenomyosis
title_short Determining the Molecular Background of Endometrial Receptivity in Adenomyosis
title_sort determining the molecular background of endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32933042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom10091311
work_keys_str_mv AT prasnikarerika determiningthemolecularbackgroundofendometrialreceptivityinadenomyosis
AT kunejtanja determiningthemolecularbackgroundofendometrialreceptivityinadenomyosis
AT repnikkatja determiningthemolecularbackgroundofendometrialreceptivityinadenomyosis
AT potocnikuros determiningthemolecularbackgroundofendometrialreceptivityinadenomyosis
AT knezjure determiningthemolecularbackgroundofendometrialreceptivityinadenomyosis
AT kovacicborut determiningthemolecularbackgroundofendometrialreceptivityinadenomyosis