Cargando…
Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy †
Background: Ceftriaxone has standard, set dosing regimens that may not achieve adequate serum concentrations in obese patients compared to non-obese patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of obesity on ceftriaxone efficacy when used as definitive monotherapy to treat infectio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660113 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases8030027 |
_version_ | 1783595473270996992 |
---|---|
author | Barber, Katie E. Loper, J. Taylor Morrison, Austin R. Stover, Kayla R. Wagner, Jamie L. |
author_facet | Barber, Katie E. Loper, J. Taylor Morrison, Austin R. Stover, Kayla R. Wagner, Jamie L. |
author_sort | Barber, Katie E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Ceftriaxone has standard, set dosing regimens that may not achieve adequate serum concentrations in obese patients compared to non-obese patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of obesity on ceftriaxone efficacy when used as definitive monotherapy to treat infections. Methods: This retrospective cohort included adult inpatients treated with ceftriaxone monotherapy for ≥72 h between July 01, 2015–July 31, 2017. Patients were excluded if their infection lacked source control within 72 h or if they had polymicrobial infections requiring more than one antibiotic for definitive therapy. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical failure between obese versus non-obese patients, defined as a composite of (1) change in definitive therapy > 72 h due to clinical worsening; (2) residual leukocytosis (white blood cell count (WBC) > 10 × 10(9)/L) > 72 h after treatment initiation; (3) presence of a fever (single temperature > 100.9 °F) > 72 h after treatment initiation; or (4) readmission within 30 days due to re-infection with the same organism. Results: A total of 101 patients were included in the study: 39 obese and 62 non-obese. The most common indications for ceftriaxone were urinary tract (52.5%), respiratory tract (24.8%), and bloodstream (24.8%) infections. The most commonly isolated organisms were Escherichia coli (48.5%) and Klebsiella species (15.8%). Most patients received 1g every 24 h. Clinical failure was observed in 61.5% of obese patients versus 40.3% of non-obese patients (p = 0.038). Conclusion: Obese patients treated with ceftriaxone were more likely to experience clinical failure when compared to non-obese patients. Further analyses are warranted to determine if weight-based dosing is required in obese patients treated with ceftriaxone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7563366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75633662020-10-27 Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy † Barber, Katie E. Loper, J. Taylor Morrison, Austin R. Stover, Kayla R. Wagner, Jamie L. Diseases Brief Report Background: Ceftriaxone has standard, set dosing regimens that may not achieve adequate serum concentrations in obese patients compared to non-obese patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of obesity on ceftriaxone efficacy when used as definitive monotherapy to treat infections. Methods: This retrospective cohort included adult inpatients treated with ceftriaxone monotherapy for ≥72 h between July 01, 2015–July 31, 2017. Patients were excluded if their infection lacked source control within 72 h or if they had polymicrobial infections requiring more than one antibiotic for definitive therapy. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical failure between obese versus non-obese patients, defined as a composite of (1) change in definitive therapy > 72 h due to clinical worsening; (2) residual leukocytosis (white blood cell count (WBC) > 10 × 10(9)/L) > 72 h after treatment initiation; (3) presence of a fever (single temperature > 100.9 °F) > 72 h after treatment initiation; or (4) readmission within 30 days due to re-infection with the same organism. Results: A total of 101 patients were included in the study: 39 obese and 62 non-obese. The most common indications for ceftriaxone were urinary tract (52.5%), respiratory tract (24.8%), and bloodstream (24.8%) infections. The most commonly isolated organisms were Escherichia coli (48.5%) and Klebsiella species (15.8%). Most patients received 1g every 24 h. Clinical failure was observed in 61.5% of obese patients versus 40.3% of non-obese patients (p = 0.038). Conclusion: Obese patients treated with ceftriaxone were more likely to experience clinical failure when compared to non-obese patients. Further analyses are warranted to determine if weight-based dosing is required in obese patients treated with ceftriaxone. MDPI 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7563366/ /pubmed/32660113 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases8030027 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Barber, Katie E. Loper, J. Taylor Morrison, Austin R. Stover, Kayla R. Wagner, Jamie L. Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy † |
title | Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy † |
title_full | Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy † |
title_fullStr | Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy † |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy † |
title_short | Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy † |
title_sort | impact of obesity on ceftriaxone efficacy † |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660113 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases8030027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barberkatiee impactofobesityonceftriaxoneefficacy AT loperjtaylor impactofobesityonceftriaxoneefficacy AT morrisonaustinr impactofobesityonceftriaxoneefficacy AT stoverkaylar impactofobesityonceftriaxoneefficacy AT wagnerjamiel impactofobesityonceftriaxoneefficacy |