Cargando…

Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy †

Background: Ceftriaxone has standard, set dosing regimens that may not achieve adequate serum concentrations in obese patients compared to non-obese patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of obesity on ceftriaxone efficacy when used as definitive monotherapy to treat infectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barber, Katie E., Loper, J. Taylor, Morrison, Austin R., Stover, Kayla R., Wagner, Jamie L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660113
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases8030027
_version_ 1783595473270996992
author Barber, Katie E.
Loper, J. Taylor
Morrison, Austin R.
Stover, Kayla R.
Wagner, Jamie L.
author_facet Barber, Katie E.
Loper, J. Taylor
Morrison, Austin R.
Stover, Kayla R.
Wagner, Jamie L.
author_sort Barber, Katie E.
collection PubMed
description Background: Ceftriaxone has standard, set dosing regimens that may not achieve adequate serum concentrations in obese patients compared to non-obese patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of obesity on ceftriaxone efficacy when used as definitive monotherapy to treat infections. Methods: This retrospective cohort included adult inpatients treated with ceftriaxone monotherapy for ≥72 h between July 01, 2015–July 31, 2017. Patients were excluded if their infection lacked source control within 72 h or if they had polymicrobial infections requiring more than one antibiotic for definitive therapy. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical failure between obese versus non-obese patients, defined as a composite of (1) change in definitive therapy > 72 h due to clinical worsening; (2) residual leukocytosis (white blood cell count (WBC) > 10 × 10(9)/L) > 72 h after treatment initiation; (3) presence of a fever (single temperature > 100.9 °F) > 72 h after treatment initiation; or (4) readmission within 30 days due to re-infection with the same organism. Results: A total of 101 patients were included in the study: 39 obese and 62 non-obese. The most common indications for ceftriaxone were urinary tract (52.5%), respiratory tract (24.8%), and bloodstream (24.8%) infections. The most commonly isolated organisms were Escherichia coli (48.5%) and Klebsiella species (15.8%). Most patients received 1g every 24 h. Clinical failure was observed in 61.5% of obese patients versus 40.3% of non-obese patients (p = 0.038). Conclusion: Obese patients treated with ceftriaxone were more likely to experience clinical failure when compared to non-obese patients. Further analyses are warranted to determine if weight-based dosing is required in obese patients treated with ceftriaxone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7563366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75633662020-10-27 Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy † Barber, Katie E. Loper, J. Taylor Morrison, Austin R. Stover, Kayla R. Wagner, Jamie L. Diseases Brief Report Background: Ceftriaxone has standard, set dosing regimens that may not achieve adequate serum concentrations in obese patients compared to non-obese patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of obesity on ceftriaxone efficacy when used as definitive monotherapy to treat infections. Methods: This retrospective cohort included adult inpatients treated with ceftriaxone monotherapy for ≥72 h between July 01, 2015–July 31, 2017. Patients were excluded if their infection lacked source control within 72 h or if they had polymicrobial infections requiring more than one antibiotic for definitive therapy. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical failure between obese versus non-obese patients, defined as a composite of (1) change in definitive therapy > 72 h due to clinical worsening; (2) residual leukocytosis (white blood cell count (WBC) > 10 × 10(9)/L) > 72 h after treatment initiation; (3) presence of a fever (single temperature > 100.9 °F) > 72 h after treatment initiation; or (4) readmission within 30 days due to re-infection with the same organism. Results: A total of 101 patients were included in the study: 39 obese and 62 non-obese. The most common indications for ceftriaxone were urinary tract (52.5%), respiratory tract (24.8%), and bloodstream (24.8%) infections. The most commonly isolated organisms were Escherichia coli (48.5%) and Klebsiella species (15.8%). Most patients received 1g every 24 h. Clinical failure was observed in 61.5% of obese patients versus 40.3% of non-obese patients (p = 0.038). Conclusion: Obese patients treated with ceftriaxone were more likely to experience clinical failure when compared to non-obese patients. Further analyses are warranted to determine if weight-based dosing is required in obese patients treated with ceftriaxone. MDPI 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7563366/ /pubmed/32660113 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases8030027 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Barber, Katie E.
Loper, J. Taylor
Morrison, Austin R.
Stover, Kayla R.
Wagner, Jamie L.
Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy †
title Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy †
title_full Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy †
title_fullStr Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy †
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy †
title_short Impact of Obesity on Ceftriaxone Efficacy †
title_sort impact of obesity on ceftriaxone efficacy †
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660113
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases8030027
work_keys_str_mv AT barberkatiee impactofobesityonceftriaxoneefficacy
AT loperjtaylor impactofobesityonceftriaxoneefficacy
AT morrisonaustinr impactofobesityonceftriaxoneefficacy
AT stoverkaylar impactofobesityonceftriaxoneefficacy
AT wagnerjamiel impactofobesityonceftriaxoneefficacy