Cargando…

Plasma Treatment of Polypropylene-Based Wood–Plastic Composites (WPC): Influences of Working Gas

In this study, a polypropylene (PP)-based wood–plastic composite with maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene (MAPP) as a coupling agent and a wood content of 60% was extruded and specimens were injection molded. The samples were plasma treated utilizing a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) setup wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sauerbier, Philipp, Köhler, Robert, Renner, Gerrit, Militz, Holger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867036
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12091933
_version_ 1783595479309746176
author Sauerbier, Philipp
Köhler, Robert
Renner, Gerrit
Militz, Holger
author_facet Sauerbier, Philipp
Köhler, Robert
Renner, Gerrit
Militz, Holger
author_sort Sauerbier, Philipp
collection PubMed
description In this study, a polypropylene (PP)-based wood–plastic composite with maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene (MAPP) as a coupling agent and a wood content of 60% was extruded and specimens were injection molded. The samples were plasma treated utilizing a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) setup with three different working gases: Ar/O(2) (90%/10%), Ar/N(2) (90%/10%), and synthetic air. This process aims to improve the coating and gluing properties of the otherwise challenging apolar surface of PP based wood–plastic composites (WPC). Chemical analysis with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed the formation of oxygen-based functional groups on the surface, independently from the working gas used for the treatment. Laser scanning microscopy (LSM) examined the surface roughness and revealed that the two argon-containing working gases roughened the surface more than synthetic air. However, the contact angle for water was reduced significantly after treatment, revealing measurement artifacts for water and diiodomethane due to the severe changes in surface morphology. The adhesion of acrylic dispersion coating was significantly increased, resulting in a pull-off strength of approximately 4 N/mm(2), and cross-cut tests assigned the best adhesion class (0), on a scale from 0 to 5, after plasma treatment with any working gas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7563392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75633922020-10-28 Plasma Treatment of Polypropylene-Based Wood–Plastic Composites (WPC): Influences of Working Gas Sauerbier, Philipp Köhler, Robert Renner, Gerrit Militz, Holger Polymers (Basel) Article In this study, a polypropylene (PP)-based wood–plastic composite with maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene (MAPP) as a coupling agent and a wood content of 60% was extruded and specimens were injection molded. The samples were plasma treated utilizing a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) setup with three different working gases: Ar/O(2) (90%/10%), Ar/N(2) (90%/10%), and synthetic air. This process aims to improve the coating and gluing properties of the otherwise challenging apolar surface of PP based wood–plastic composites (WPC). Chemical analysis with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed the formation of oxygen-based functional groups on the surface, independently from the working gas used for the treatment. Laser scanning microscopy (LSM) examined the surface roughness and revealed that the two argon-containing working gases roughened the surface more than synthetic air. However, the contact angle for water was reduced significantly after treatment, revealing measurement artifacts for water and diiodomethane due to the severe changes in surface morphology. The adhesion of acrylic dispersion coating was significantly increased, resulting in a pull-off strength of approximately 4 N/mm(2), and cross-cut tests assigned the best adhesion class (0), on a scale from 0 to 5, after plasma treatment with any working gas. MDPI 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7563392/ /pubmed/32867036 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12091933 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sauerbier, Philipp
Köhler, Robert
Renner, Gerrit
Militz, Holger
Plasma Treatment of Polypropylene-Based Wood–Plastic Composites (WPC): Influences of Working Gas
title Plasma Treatment of Polypropylene-Based Wood–Plastic Composites (WPC): Influences of Working Gas
title_full Plasma Treatment of Polypropylene-Based Wood–Plastic Composites (WPC): Influences of Working Gas
title_fullStr Plasma Treatment of Polypropylene-Based Wood–Plastic Composites (WPC): Influences of Working Gas
title_full_unstemmed Plasma Treatment of Polypropylene-Based Wood–Plastic Composites (WPC): Influences of Working Gas
title_short Plasma Treatment of Polypropylene-Based Wood–Plastic Composites (WPC): Influences of Working Gas
title_sort plasma treatment of polypropylene-based wood–plastic composites (wpc): influences of working gas
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867036
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12091933
work_keys_str_mv AT sauerbierphilipp plasmatreatmentofpolypropylenebasedwoodplasticcompositeswpcinfluencesofworkinggas
AT kohlerrobert plasmatreatmentofpolypropylenebasedwoodplasticcompositeswpcinfluencesofworkinggas
AT rennergerrit plasmatreatmentofpolypropylenebasedwoodplasticcompositeswpcinfluencesofworkinggas
AT militzholger plasmatreatmentofpolypropylenebasedwoodplasticcompositeswpcinfluencesofworkinggas