Cargando…
Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys
Question formats are critical to the collection of consumer health attitudes, food product characterizations, and perceptions. The information from those surveys provides important insights in the product development process. Four formats based on the same concept have been used for prior studies: C...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps3030049 |
_version_ | 1783595493331304448 |
---|---|
author | Seninde, Denis Richard Chambers, Edgar |
author_facet | Seninde, Denis Richard Chambers, Edgar |
author_sort | Seninde, Denis Richard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Question formats are critical to the collection of consumer health attitudes, food product characterizations, and perceptions. The information from those surveys provides important insights in the product development process. Four formats based on the same concept have been used for prior studies: Check-All-That-Apply (CATA), Check-All-Statements (CAS), Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA), and Rate-All-Statements (RAS). Data can vary depending on what question format is used in the research, and this can affect the interpretation of the findings and subsequent decisions. This survey protocol compares the four question formats. Using a modified version of the Eating Motivation Survey (EMS) to test consumer eating motivations for five food items, each question format was translated and randomly assigned to respondents (N = 200 per country per format) from Brazil (Portuguese), China (Mandarin Chinese), India (Hindi or English), Spain (Spanish), and the USA (English). The results of this survey should provide more understanding of the differences and similarities in distribution of data for the four scale formats. Also, the translations and findings of this survey can guide marketers, sensory scientists, product developers, dieticians, and nutritionists when designing future consumer studies that will use these question formats. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7563457 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75634572020-10-27 Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys Seninde, Denis Richard Chambers, Edgar Methods Protoc Protocol Question formats are critical to the collection of consumer health attitudes, food product characterizations, and perceptions. The information from those surveys provides important insights in the product development process. Four formats based on the same concept have been used for prior studies: Check-All-That-Apply (CATA), Check-All-Statements (CAS), Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA), and Rate-All-Statements (RAS). Data can vary depending on what question format is used in the research, and this can affect the interpretation of the findings and subsequent decisions. This survey protocol compares the four question formats. Using a modified version of the Eating Motivation Survey (EMS) to test consumer eating motivations for five food items, each question format was translated and randomly assigned to respondents (N = 200 per country per format) from Brazil (Portuguese), China (Mandarin Chinese), India (Hindi or English), Spain (Spanish), and the USA (English). The results of this survey should provide more understanding of the differences and similarities in distribution of data for the four scale formats. Also, the translations and findings of this survey can guide marketers, sensory scientists, product developers, dieticians, and nutritionists when designing future consumer studies that will use these question formats. MDPI 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7563457/ /pubmed/32674527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps3030049 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Protocol Seninde, Denis Richard Chambers, Edgar Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys |
title | Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys |
title_full | Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys |
title_fullStr | Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys |
title_short | Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys |
title_sort | comparing four question formats in five languages for on-line consumer surveys |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps3030049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT senindedenisrichard comparingfourquestionformatsinfivelanguagesforonlineconsumersurveys AT chambersedgar comparingfourquestionformatsinfivelanguagesforonlineconsumersurveys |