Cargando…

Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys

Question formats are critical to the collection of consumer health attitudes, food product characterizations, and perceptions. The information from those surveys provides important insights in the product development process. Four formats based on the same concept have been used for prior studies: C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seninde, Denis Richard, Chambers, Edgar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674527
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps3030049
_version_ 1783595493331304448
author Seninde, Denis Richard
Chambers, Edgar
author_facet Seninde, Denis Richard
Chambers, Edgar
author_sort Seninde, Denis Richard
collection PubMed
description Question formats are critical to the collection of consumer health attitudes, food product characterizations, and perceptions. The information from those surveys provides important insights in the product development process. Four formats based on the same concept have been used for prior studies: Check-All-That-Apply (CATA), Check-All-Statements (CAS), Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA), and Rate-All-Statements (RAS). Data can vary depending on what question format is used in the research, and this can affect the interpretation of the findings and subsequent decisions. This survey protocol compares the four question formats. Using a modified version of the Eating Motivation Survey (EMS) to test consumer eating motivations for five food items, each question format was translated and randomly assigned to respondents (N = 200 per country per format) from Brazil (Portuguese), China (Mandarin Chinese), India (Hindi or English), Spain (Spanish), and the USA (English). The results of this survey should provide more understanding of the differences and similarities in distribution of data for the four scale formats. Also, the translations and findings of this survey can guide marketers, sensory scientists, product developers, dieticians, and nutritionists when designing future consumer studies that will use these question formats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7563457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75634572020-10-27 Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys Seninde, Denis Richard Chambers, Edgar Methods Protoc Protocol Question formats are critical to the collection of consumer health attitudes, food product characterizations, and perceptions. The information from those surveys provides important insights in the product development process. Four formats based on the same concept have been used for prior studies: Check-All-That-Apply (CATA), Check-All-Statements (CAS), Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA), and Rate-All-Statements (RAS). Data can vary depending on what question format is used in the research, and this can affect the interpretation of the findings and subsequent decisions. This survey protocol compares the four question formats. Using a modified version of the Eating Motivation Survey (EMS) to test consumer eating motivations for five food items, each question format was translated and randomly assigned to respondents (N = 200 per country per format) from Brazil (Portuguese), China (Mandarin Chinese), India (Hindi or English), Spain (Spanish), and the USA (English). The results of this survey should provide more understanding of the differences and similarities in distribution of data for the four scale formats. Also, the translations and findings of this survey can guide marketers, sensory scientists, product developers, dieticians, and nutritionists when designing future consumer studies that will use these question formats. MDPI 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7563457/ /pubmed/32674527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps3030049 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Protocol
Seninde, Denis Richard
Chambers, Edgar
Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys
title Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys
title_full Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys
title_fullStr Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys
title_short Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys
title_sort comparing four question formats in five languages for on-line consumer surveys
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674527
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps3030049
work_keys_str_mv AT senindedenisrichard comparingfourquestionformatsinfivelanguagesforonlineconsumersurveys
AT chambersedgar comparingfourquestionformatsinfivelanguagesforonlineconsumersurveys