Cargando…
Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine
The international governing body of equestrian sports requires that horses be vaccinated against equine influenza within 6 months and 21 days of competing. The aim of this study was to compare the antibody response of young sport horses to six-monthly booster vaccination with equine influenza vaccin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8030372 |
_version_ | 1783595508392001536 |
---|---|
author | Entenfellner, Johanna Gahan, Jacinta Garvey, Marie Walsh, Cathal Venner, Monica Cullinane, Ann |
author_facet | Entenfellner, Johanna Gahan, Jacinta Garvey, Marie Walsh, Cathal Venner, Monica Cullinane, Ann |
author_sort | Entenfellner, Johanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | The international governing body of equestrian sports requires that horses be vaccinated against equine influenza within 6 months and 21 days of competing. The aim of this study was to compare the antibody response of young sport horses to six-monthly booster vaccination with equine influenza vaccines of different formulations. An inactivated vaccine was allocated to 35 horses and subunit and recombinant vaccines were allocated to 34 horses each. After vaccination, all horses were monitored for evidence of adverse reactions. Whole blood samples were collected at the time of vaccination and on nine occasions up to six months and 21 days post vaccination. Antibodies against equine influenza were measured by single radial haemolysis. Transient fever and injection site reactions were observed in several horses vaccinated with each vaccine. Only two horses failed to seroconvert post booster vaccination but there was a delayed response to the recombinant vaccine. The antibody response to the recombinant vaccine was lower than that induced by the whole-inactivated and subunit vaccines up to three months post vaccination. Thereafter, there was no significant difference. By six months post vaccination, the majority of horses in all three groups were clinically but not virologically protected. There was minimal decline in antibody titres within the 21-day grace period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7563521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75635212020-10-27 Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine Entenfellner, Johanna Gahan, Jacinta Garvey, Marie Walsh, Cathal Venner, Monica Cullinane, Ann Vaccines (Basel) Article The international governing body of equestrian sports requires that horses be vaccinated against equine influenza within 6 months and 21 days of competing. The aim of this study was to compare the antibody response of young sport horses to six-monthly booster vaccination with equine influenza vaccines of different formulations. An inactivated vaccine was allocated to 35 horses and subunit and recombinant vaccines were allocated to 34 horses each. After vaccination, all horses were monitored for evidence of adverse reactions. Whole blood samples were collected at the time of vaccination and on nine occasions up to six months and 21 days post vaccination. Antibodies against equine influenza were measured by single radial haemolysis. Transient fever and injection site reactions were observed in several horses vaccinated with each vaccine. Only two horses failed to seroconvert post booster vaccination but there was a delayed response to the recombinant vaccine. The antibody response to the recombinant vaccine was lower than that induced by the whole-inactivated and subunit vaccines up to three months post vaccination. Thereafter, there was no significant difference. By six months post vaccination, the majority of horses in all three groups were clinically but not virologically protected. There was minimal decline in antibody titres within the 21-day grace period. MDPI 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7563521/ /pubmed/32664411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8030372 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Entenfellner, Johanna Gahan, Jacinta Garvey, Marie Walsh, Cathal Venner, Monica Cullinane, Ann Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine |
title | Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine |
title_full | Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine |
title_fullStr | Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine |
title_full_unstemmed | Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine |
title_short | Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine |
title_sort | response of sport horses to different formulations of equine influenza vaccine |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8030372 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT entenfellnerjohanna responseofsporthorsestodifferentformulationsofequineinfluenzavaccine AT gahanjacinta responseofsporthorsestodifferentformulationsofequineinfluenzavaccine AT garveymarie responseofsporthorsestodifferentformulationsofequineinfluenzavaccine AT walshcathal responseofsporthorsestodifferentformulationsofequineinfluenzavaccine AT vennermonica responseofsporthorsestodifferentformulationsofequineinfluenzavaccine AT cullinaneann responseofsporthorsestodifferentformulationsofequineinfluenzavaccine |