Cargando…

Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine

The international governing body of equestrian sports requires that horses be vaccinated against equine influenza within 6 months and 21 days of competing. The aim of this study was to compare the antibody response of young sport horses to six-monthly booster vaccination with equine influenza vaccin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Entenfellner, Johanna, Gahan, Jacinta, Garvey, Marie, Walsh, Cathal, Venner, Monica, Cullinane, Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8030372
_version_ 1783595508392001536
author Entenfellner, Johanna
Gahan, Jacinta
Garvey, Marie
Walsh, Cathal
Venner, Monica
Cullinane, Ann
author_facet Entenfellner, Johanna
Gahan, Jacinta
Garvey, Marie
Walsh, Cathal
Venner, Monica
Cullinane, Ann
author_sort Entenfellner, Johanna
collection PubMed
description The international governing body of equestrian sports requires that horses be vaccinated against equine influenza within 6 months and 21 days of competing. The aim of this study was to compare the antibody response of young sport horses to six-monthly booster vaccination with equine influenza vaccines of different formulations. An inactivated vaccine was allocated to 35 horses and subunit and recombinant vaccines were allocated to 34 horses each. After vaccination, all horses were monitored for evidence of adverse reactions. Whole blood samples were collected at the time of vaccination and on nine occasions up to six months and 21 days post vaccination. Antibodies against equine influenza were measured by single radial haemolysis. Transient fever and injection site reactions were observed in several horses vaccinated with each vaccine. Only two horses failed to seroconvert post booster vaccination but there was a delayed response to the recombinant vaccine. The antibody response to the recombinant vaccine was lower than that induced by the whole-inactivated and subunit vaccines up to three months post vaccination. Thereafter, there was no significant difference. By six months post vaccination, the majority of horses in all three groups were clinically but not virologically protected. There was minimal decline in antibody titres within the 21-day grace period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7563521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75635212020-10-27 Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine Entenfellner, Johanna Gahan, Jacinta Garvey, Marie Walsh, Cathal Venner, Monica Cullinane, Ann Vaccines (Basel) Article The international governing body of equestrian sports requires that horses be vaccinated against equine influenza within 6 months and 21 days of competing. The aim of this study was to compare the antibody response of young sport horses to six-monthly booster vaccination with equine influenza vaccines of different formulations. An inactivated vaccine was allocated to 35 horses and subunit and recombinant vaccines were allocated to 34 horses each. After vaccination, all horses were monitored for evidence of adverse reactions. Whole blood samples were collected at the time of vaccination and on nine occasions up to six months and 21 days post vaccination. Antibodies against equine influenza were measured by single radial haemolysis. Transient fever and injection site reactions were observed in several horses vaccinated with each vaccine. Only two horses failed to seroconvert post booster vaccination but there was a delayed response to the recombinant vaccine. The antibody response to the recombinant vaccine was lower than that induced by the whole-inactivated and subunit vaccines up to three months post vaccination. Thereafter, there was no significant difference. By six months post vaccination, the majority of horses in all three groups were clinically but not virologically protected. There was minimal decline in antibody titres within the 21-day grace period. MDPI 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7563521/ /pubmed/32664411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8030372 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Entenfellner, Johanna
Gahan, Jacinta
Garvey, Marie
Walsh, Cathal
Venner, Monica
Cullinane, Ann
Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine
title Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine
title_full Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine
title_fullStr Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine
title_full_unstemmed Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine
title_short Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine
title_sort response of sport horses to different formulations of equine influenza vaccine
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8030372
work_keys_str_mv AT entenfellnerjohanna responseofsporthorsestodifferentformulationsofequineinfluenzavaccine
AT gahanjacinta responseofsporthorsestodifferentformulationsofequineinfluenzavaccine
AT garveymarie responseofsporthorsestodifferentformulationsofequineinfluenzavaccine
AT walshcathal responseofsporthorsestodifferentformulationsofequineinfluenzavaccine
AT vennermonica responseofsporthorsestodifferentformulationsofequineinfluenzavaccine
AT cullinaneann responseofsporthorsestodifferentformulationsofequineinfluenzavaccine