Cargando…
Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Background: The introduction of modern sub-perception modalities has improved the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in refractory pain syndromes of the trunk and lower limbs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low and high frequency SCS among patients with chron...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32878061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092810 |
_version_ | 1783595517055336448 |
---|---|
author | Sokal, Paweł Malukiewicz, Agnieszka Kierońska, Sara Murawska, Joanna Guzowski, Cezary Rudaś, Marcin Paczkowski, Dariusz Rusinek, Marcin Krakowiak, Mateusz |
author_facet | Sokal, Paweł Malukiewicz, Agnieszka Kierońska, Sara Murawska, Joanna Guzowski, Cezary Rudaś, Marcin Paczkowski, Dariusz Rusinek, Marcin Krakowiak, Mateusz |
author_sort | Sokal, Paweł |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The introduction of modern sub-perception modalities has improved the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in refractory pain syndromes of the trunk and lower limbs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low and high frequency SCS among patients with chronic pain. Material and methods: A randomised, semi-double-blind, placebo controlled, four period (4 × 2 weeks) crossover trial was conducted from August 2018 to January 2020. Eighteen patients with SCS due to failed back surgery syndrome and/or complex regional pain syndrome were randomised to four treatment arms without washout periods: (1) low frequency (40-60 Hz), (2) 1 kHz, (3) clustered tonic, and (4) sham SCS (i.e., placebo). The primary outcome was pain scores measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively and during subsequent treatment arms. Results: Pain scores (VAS) reported during the preoperative period was M (SD) = 8.13 (0.99). There was a 50% reduction in pain reported in the low frequency tonic treatment group (M (SD) = 4.18 (1.76)), a 37% reduction in the 1 kHz treatment group (M (SD) = 5.17 (1.4)), a 34% reduction in the clustered tonic settings group (M (SD) = 5.27 (1.33)), and a 34% reduction in the sham stimulation group (M (SD) = 5.42 (1.22)). The reduction in pain from the preoperative period to the treatment period was significant in each treatment group (p < 0.001). Overall, these reductions were of comparable magnitude between treatments. However, the modality most preferred by patients was low frequency (55% or 10 patients). Conclusions: The pain-relieving effects of SCS reached significance and were comparable across all modes of stimulation including sham. Sub-perception stimulation was not superior to supra-perception. SCS was characterised by a high degree of placebo effect. No evidence of carryover effect was observed between subsequent treatments. Contemporary neuromodulation procedures should be tailored to the individual preferences of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7563558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75635582020-10-27 Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial Sokal, Paweł Malukiewicz, Agnieszka Kierońska, Sara Murawska, Joanna Guzowski, Cezary Rudaś, Marcin Paczkowski, Dariusz Rusinek, Marcin Krakowiak, Mateusz J Clin Med Article Background: The introduction of modern sub-perception modalities has improved the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in refractory pain syndromes of the trunk and lower limbs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low and high frequency SCS among patients with chronic pain. Material and methods: A randomised, semi-double-blind, placebo controlled, four period (4 × 2 weeks) crossover trial was conducted from August 2018 to January 2020. Eighteen patients with SCS due to failed back surgery syndrome and/or complex regional pain syndrome were randomised to four treatment arms without washout periods: (1) low frequency (40-60 Hz), (2) 1 kHz, (3) clustered tonic, and (4) sham SCS (i.e., placebo). The primary outcome was pain scores measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively and during subsequent treatment arms. Results: Pain scores (VAS) reported during the preoperative period was M (SD) = 8.13 (0.99). There was a 50% reduction in pain reported in the low frequency tonic treatment group (M (SD) = 4.18 (1.76)), a 37% reduction in the 1 kHz treatment group (M (SD) = 5.17 (1.4)), a 34% reduction in the clustered tonic settings group (M (SD) = 5.27 (1.33)), and a 34% reduction in the sham stimulation group (M (SD) = 5.42 (1.22)). The reduction in pain from the preoperative period to the treatment period was significant in each treatment group (p < 0.001). Overall, these reductions were of comparable magnitude between treatments. However, the modality most preferred by patients was low frequency (55% or 10 patients). Conclusions: The pain-relieving effects of SCS reached significance and were comparable across all modes of stimulation including sham. Sub-perception stimulation was not superior to supra-perception. SCS was characterised by a high degree of placebo effect. No evidence of carryover effect was observed between subsequent treatments. Contemporary neuromodulation procedures should be tailored to the individual preferences of patients. MDPI 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7563558/ /pubmed/32878061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092810 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sokal, Paweł Malukiewicz, Agnieszka Kierońska, Sara Murawska, Joanna Guzowski, Cezary Rudaś, Marcin Paczkowski, Dariusz Rusinek, Marcin Krakowiak, Mateusz Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial |
title | Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial |
title_full | Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial |
title_short | Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial |
title_sort | sub-perception and supra-perception spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain syndrome: a randomized, semi-double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32878061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sokalpaweł subperceptionandsupraperceptionspinalcordstimulationinchronicpainsyndromearandomizedsemidoubleblindcrossoverplacebocontrolledtrial AT malukiewiczagnieszka subperceptionandsupraperceptionspinalcordstimulationinchronicpainsyndromearandomizedsemidoubleblindcrossoverplacebocontrolledtrial AT kieronskasara subperceptionandsupraperceptionspinalcordstimulationinchronicpainsyndromearandomizedsemidoubleblindcrossoverplacebocontrolledtrial AT murawskajoanna subperceptionandsupraperceptionspinalcordstimulationinchronicpainsyndromearandomizedsemidoubleblindcrossoverplacebocontrolledtrial AT guzowskicezary subperceptionandsupraperceptionspinalcordstimulationinchronicpainsyndromearandomizedsemidoubleblindcrossoverplacebocontrolledtrial AT rudasmarcin subperceptionandsupraperceptionspinalcordstimulationinchronicpainsyndromearandomizedsemidoubleblindcrossoverplacebocontrolledtrial AT paczkowskidariusz subperceptionandsupraperceptionspinalcordstimulationinchronicpainsyndromearandomizedsemidoubleblindcrossoverplacebocontrolledtrial AT rusinekmarcin subperceptionandsupraperceptionspinalcordstimulationinchronicpainsyndromearandomizedsemidoubleblindcrossoverplacebocontrolledtrial AT krakowiakmateusz subperceptionandsupraperceptionspinalcordstimulationinchronicpainsyndromearandomizedsemidoubleblindcrossoverplacebocontrolledtrial |