Cargando…

How Different Are the Molecular Mechanisms of Nodal and Distant Metastasis in Luminal A Breast Cancer?

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Lymph node status is one of the best prognostic factors in breast cancer, however, its association with distant metastasis is not straightforward. Here we compare molecular mechanisms of nodal and distant metastasis in molecular subtypes of breast cancer, with major focus on luminal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lapcik, Petr, Pospisilova, Anna, Janacova, Lucia, Grell, Peter, Fabian, Pavel, Bouchal, Pavel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32947901
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092638
_version_ 1783595522942042112
author Lapcik, Petr
Pospisilova, Anna
Janacova, Lucia
Grell, Peter
Fabian, Pavel
Bouchal, Pavel
author_facet Lapcik, Petr
Pospisilova, Anna
Janacova, Lucia
Grell, Peter
Fabian, Pavel
Bouchal, Pavel
author_sort Lapcik, Petr
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Lymph node status is one of the best prognostic factors in breast cancer, however, its association with distant metastasis is not straightforward. Here we compare molecular mechanisms of nodal and distant metastasis in molecular subtypes of breast cancer, with major focus on luminal A patients. Our results indicate that lymph node positivity is associated with NF-κB and Src pathways and is related to high risk of distant metastasis in luminal A patients. Distant metastasis of lymph node negative tumors is related to cell proliferation control and thrombolysis, whereas distant metastasis of lymph node positive tumors is associated mostly to immune response. These mechanisms vary in other molecular subtypes. Our data indicate that the management of breast cancer and prevention of distant metastasis requires stratified approach based on targeted strategies. ABSTRACT: Lymph node status is one of the best prognostic factors in breast cancer, however, its association with distant metastasis is not straightforward. Here we compare molecular mechanisms of nodal and distant metastasis in molecular subtypes of breast cancer, with major focus on luminal A patients. We analyze a new cohort of 706 patients (MMCI_706) as well as an independent cohort of 836 primary tumors with full gene expression information (SUPERTAM_HGU133A). We evaluate the risk of distant metastasis, analyze targetable molecular mechanisms in Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and identify relevant inhibitors. Lymph node positivity is generally associated with NF-κB and Src pathways and is related to high risk (OR: 5.062 and 2.401 in MMCI_706 and SUPERTAM_HGU133A, respectively, p < 0.05) of distant metastasis in luminal A patients. However, a part (≤15%) of lymph node negative tumors at the diagnosis develop the distant metastasis which is related to cell proliferation control and thrombolysis. Distant metastasis of lymph node positive patients is mostly associated with immune response. These pro-metastatic mechanisms further vary in other molecular subtypes. Our data indicate that the management of breast cancer and prevention of distant metastasis requires stratified approach based on targeted strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7563588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75635882020-10-27 How Different Are the Molecular Mechanisms of Nodal and Distant Metastasis in Luminal A Breast Cancer? Lapcik, Petr Pospisilova, Anna Janacova, Lucia Grell, Peter Fabian, Pavel Bouchal, Pavel Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Lymph node status is one of the best prognostic factors in breast cancer, however, its association with distant metastasis is not straightforward. Here we compare molecular mechanisms of nodal and distant metastasis in molecular subtypes of breast cancer, with major focus on luminal A patients. Our results indicate that lymph node positivity is associated with NF-κB and Src pathways and is related to high risk of distant metastasis in luminal A patients. Distant metastasis of lymph node negative tumors is related to cell proliferation control and thrombolysis, whereas distant metastasis of lymph node positive tumors is associated mostly to immune response. These mechanisms vary in other molecular subtypes. Our data indicate that the management of breast cancer and prevention of distant metastasis requires stratified approach based on targeted strategies. ABSTRACT: Lymph node status is one of the best prognostic factors in breast cancer, however, its association with distant metastasis is not straightforward. Here we compare molecular mechanisms of nodal and distant metastasis in molecular subtypes of breast cancer, with major focus on luminal A patients. We analyze a new cohort of 706 patients (MMCI_706) as well as an independent cohort of 836 primary tumors with full gene expression information (SUPERTAM_HGU133A). We evaluate the risk of distant metastasis, analyze targetable molecular mechanisms in Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and identify relevant inhibitors. Lymph node positivity is generally associated with NF-κB and Src pathways and is related to high risk (OR: 5.062 and 2.401 in MMCI_706 and SUPERTAM_HGU133A, respectively, p < 0.05) of distant metastasis in luminal A patients. However, a part (≤15%) of lymph node negative tumors at the diagnosis develop the distant metastasis which is related to cell proliferation control and thrombolysis. Distant metastasis of lymph node positive patients is mostly associated with immune response. These pro-metastatic mechanisms further vary in other molecular subtypes. Our data indicate that the management of breast cancer and prevention of distant metastasis requires stratified approach based on targeted strategies. MDPI 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7563588/ /pubmed/32947901 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092638 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lapcik, Petr
Pospisilova, Anna
Janacova, Lucia
Grell, Peter
Fabian, Pavel
Bouchal, Pavel
How Different Are the Molecular Mechanisms of Nodal and Distant Metastasis in Luminal A Breast Cancer?
title How Different Are the Molecular Mechanisms of Nodal and Distant Metastasis in Luminal A Breast Cancer?
title_full How Different Are the Molecular Mechanisms of Nodal and Distant Metastasis in Luminal A Breast Cancer?
title_fullStr How Different Are the Molecular Mechanisms of Nodal and Distant Metastasis in Luminal A Breast Cancer?
title_full_unstemmed How Different Are the Molecular Mechanisms of Nodal and Distant Metastasis in Luminal A Breast Cancer?
title_short How Different Are the Molecular Mechanisms of Nodal and Distant Metastasis in Luminal A Breast Cancer?
title_sort how different are the molecular mechanisms of nodal and distant metastasis in luminal a breast cancer?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32947901
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092638
work_keys_str_mv AT lapcikpetr howdifferentarethemolecularmechanismsofnodalanddistantmetastasisinluminalabreastcancer
AT pospisilovaanna howdifferentarethemolecularmechanismsofnodalanddistantmetastasisinluminalabreastcancer
AT janacovalucia howdifferentarethemolecularmechanismsofnodalanddistantmetastasisinluminalabreastcancer
AT grellpeter howdifferentarethemolecularmechanismsofnodalanddistantmetastasisinluminalabreastcancer
AT fabianpavel howdifferentarethemolecularmechanismsofnodalanddistantmetastasisinluminalabreastcancer
AT bouchalpavel howdifferentarethemolecularmechanismsofnodalanddistantmetastasisinluminalabreastcancer