Cargando…
Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting
[Image: see text] Three-dimensional bioprinting uses additive manufacturing techniques for the automated fabrication of hierarchically organized living constructs. The building blocks are often hydrogel-based bioinks, which need to be printed into structures with high shape fidelity to the intended...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American
Chemical Society
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32856892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 |
_version_ | 1783595632948150272 |
---|---|
author | Schwab, Andrea Levato, Riccardo D’Este, Matteo Piluso, Susanna Eglin, David Malda, Jos |
author_facet | Schwab, Andrea Levato, Riccardo D’Este, Matteo Piluso, Susanna Eglin, David Malda, Jos |
author_sort | Schwab, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Three-dimensional bioprinting uses additive manufacturing techniques for the automated fabrication of hierarchically organized living constructs. The building blocks are often hydrogel-based bioinks, which need to be printed into structures with high shape fidelity to the intended computer-aided design. For optimal cell performance, relatively soft and printable inks are preferred, although these undergo significant deformation during the printing process, which may impair shape fidelity. While the concept of good or poor printability seems rather intuitive, its quantitative definition lacks consensus and depends on multiple rheological and chemical parameters of the ink. This review discusses qualitative and quantitative methodologies to evaluate printability of bioinks for extrusion- and lithography-based bioprinting. The physicochemical parameters influencing shape fidelity are discussed, together with their importance in establishing new models, predictive tools and printing methods that are deemed instrumental for the design of next-generation bioinks, and for reproducible comparison of their structural performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7564085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American
Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75640852020-10-19 Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting Schwab, Andrea Levato, Riccardo D’Este, Matteo Piluso, Susanna Eglin, David Malda, Jos Chem Rev [Image: see text] Three-dimensional bioprinting uses additive manufacturing techniques for the automated fabrication of hierarchically organized living constructs. The building blocks are often hydrogel-based bioinks, which need to be printed into structures with high shape fidelity to the intended computer-aided design. For optimal cell performance, relatively soft and printable inks are preferred, although these undergo significant deformation during the printing process, which may impair shape fidelity. While the concept of good or poor printability seems rather intuitive, its quantitative definition lacks consensus and depends on multiple rheological and chemical parameters of the ink. This review discusses qualitative and quantitative methodologies to evaluate printability of bioinks for extrusion- and lithography-based bioprinting. The physicochemical parameters influencing shape fidelity are discussed, together with their importance in establishing new models, predictive tools and printing methods that are deemed instrumental for the design of next-generation bioinks, and for reproducible comparison of their structural performance. American Chemical Society 2020-08-28 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7564085/ /pubmed/32856892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 Text en This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Schwab, Andrea Levato, Riccardo D’Este, Matteo Piluso, Susanna Eglin, David Malda, Jos Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting |
title | Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting |
title_full | Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting |
title_fullStr | Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting |
title_full_unstemmed | Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting |
title_short | Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting |
title_sort | printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3d bioprinting |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32856892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwabandrea printabilityandshapefidelityofbioinksin3dbioprinting AT levatoriccardo printabilityandshapefidelityofbioinksin3dbioprinting AT destematteo printabilityandshapefidelityofbioinksin3dbioprinting AT pilusosusanna printabilityandshapefidelityofbioinksin3dbioprinting AT eglindavid printabilityandshapefidelityofbioinksin3dbioprinting AT maldajos printabilityandshapefidelityofbioinksin3dbioprinting |