Cargando…

Establishment and Evaluation of an In Vitro System for Biophysical Stimulation of Human Osteoblasts

While several studies investigated the effects of mechanical or electrical stimulation on osseointegration and bone fracture healing, little is known about the molecular and cellular impact of combined biophysical stimulation on peri-implant osseointegration. Therefore, we established an in vitro sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stephan, Martin, Zimmermann, Julius, Klinder, Annett, Sahm, Franziska, van Rienen, Ursula, Kämmerer, Peer W., Bader, Rainer, Jonitz-Heincke, Anika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32872592
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9091995
_version_ 1783595691755438080
author Stephan, Martin
Zimmermann, Julius
Klinder, Annett
Sahm, Franziska
van Rienen, Ursula
Kämmerer, Peer W.
Bader, Rainer
Jonitz-Heincke, Anika
author_facet Stephan, Martin
Zimmermann, Julius
Klinder, Annett
Sahm, Franziska
van Rienen, Ursula
Kämmerer, Peer W.
Bader, Rainer
Jonitz-Heincke, Anika
author_sort Stephan, Martin
collection PubMed
description While several studies investigated the effects of mechanical or electrical stimulation on osseointegration and bone fracture healing, little is known about the molecular and cellular impact of combined biophysical stimulation on peri-implant osseointegration. Therefore, we established an in vitro system, capable of applying shear stress and electric fields simultaneously. Capacitively coupled electric fields were used for electrical stimulation, while roughened Ti6Al4V bodies conducted harmonically oscillating micromotions on collagen scaffolds seeded with human osteoblasts. Different variations of single and combined stimulation were applied for three days, while samples loaded with Ti6Al4V bodies and untreated samples served as control. Metabolic activity, expression of osteogenic markers and bone remodeling markers were investigated. While combined stimulation showed no substantial benefit compared to sole mechanical stimulation, we observed that 25 µm micromotions applied by roughened Ti6Al4V bodies led to a significant increase in gene expression of osteocalcin and tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease 1. Additionally, we found an increase in metabolic activity and expression of bone remodeling markers with reduced procollagen type 1 synthesis after 100 mV(RMS) electrical stimulation. We were able to trigger specific cellular behaviors using different biophysical stimuli. In future studies, different variations of electrical stimulation will be combined with interfacial micromotions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7564340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75643402020-10-26 Establishment and Evaluation of an In Vitro System for Biophysical Stimulation of Human Osteoblasts Stephan, Martin Zimmermann, Julius Klinder, Annett Sahm, Franziska van Rienen, Ursula Kämmerer, Peer W. Bader, Rainer Jonitz-Heincke, Anika Cells Article While several studies investigated the effects of mechanical or electrical stimulation on osseointegration and bone fracture healing, little is known about the molecular and cellular impact of combined biophysical stimulation on peri-implant osseointegration. Therefore, we established an in vitro system, capable of applying shear stress and electric fields simultaneously. Capacitively coupled electric fields were used for electrical stimulation, while roughened Ti6Al4V bodies conducted harmonically oscillating micromotions on collagen scaffolds seeded with human osteoblasts. Different variations of single and combined stimulation were applied for three days, while samples loaded with Ti6Al4V bodies and untreated samples served as control. Metabolic activity, expression of osteogenic markers and bone remodeling markers were investigated. While combined stimulation showed no substantial benefit compared to sole mechanical stimulation, we observed that 25 µm micromotions applied by roughened Ti6Al4V bodies led to a significant increase in gene expression of osteocalcin and tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease 1. Additionally, we found an increase in metabolic activity and expression of bone remodeling markers with reduced procollagen type 1 synthesis after 100 mV(RMS) electrical stimulation. We were able to trigger specific cellular behaviors using different biophysical stimuli. In future studies, different variations of electrical stimulation will be combined with interfacial micromotions. MDPI 2020-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7564340/ /pubmed/32872592 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9091995 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stephan, Martin
Zimmermann, Julius
Klinder, Annett
Sahm, Franziska
van Rienen, Ursula
Kämmerer, Peer W.
Bader, Rainer
Jonitz-Heincke, Anika
Establishment and Evaluation of an In Vitro System for Biophysical Stimulation of Human Osteoblasts
title Establishment and Evaluation of an In Vitro System for Biophysical Stimulation of Human Osteoblasts
title_full Establishment and Evaluation of an In Vitro System for Biophysical Stimulation of Human Osteoblasts
title_fullStr Establishment and Evaluation of an In Vitro System for Biophysical Stimulation of Human Osteoblasts
title_full_unstemmed Establishment and Evaluation of an In Vitro System for Biophysical Stimulation of Human Osteoblasts
title_short Establishment and Evaluation of an In Vitro System for Biophysical Stimulation of Human Osteoblasts
title_sort establishment and evaluation of an in vitro system for biophysical stimulation of human osteoblasts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32872592
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9091995
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanmartin establishmentandevaluationofaninvitrosystemforbiophysicalstimulationofhumanosteoblasts
AT zimmermannjulius establishmentandevaluationofaninvitrosystemforbiophysicalstimulationofhumanosteoblasts
AT klinderannett establishmentandevaluationofaninvitrosystemforbiophysicalstimulationofhumanosteoblasts
AT sahmfranziska establishmentandevaluationofaninvitrosystemforbiophysicalstimulationofhumanosteoblasts
AT vanrienenursula establishmentandevaluationofaninvitrosystemforbiophysicalstimulationofhumanosteoblasts
AT kammererpeerw establishmentandevaluationofaninvitrosystemforbiophysicalstimulationofhumanosteoblasts
AT baderrainer establishmentandevaluationofaninvitrosystemforbiophysicalstimulationofhumanosteoblasts
AT jonitzheinckeanika establishmentandevaluationofaninvitrosystemforbiophysicalstimulationofhumanosteoblasts