Cargando…

The effects of sedation cessation within the first four hours of intensive care unit admission in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients – a quality improvement study

BACKGROUND: Early deep sedation in mechanically ventilated patients during the first 48 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission can be associated with adverse outcomes. We hypothesised that moving the ‘daily sedation break’ process forwards, might allow earlier titration of sedation to target level...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuthill, Jennifer A., Jarvie, Lyndsey, McGovern, Christopher, Shaw, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100486
_version_ 1783595734161948672
author Cuthill, Jennifer A.
Jarvie, Lyndsey
McGovern, Christopher
Shaw, Martin
author_facet Cuthill, Jennifer A.
Jarvie, Lyndsey
McGovern, Christopher
Shaw, Martin
author_sort Cuthill, Jennifer A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early deep sedation in mechanically ventilated patients during the first 48 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission can be associated with adverse outcomes. We hypothesised that moving the ‘daily sedation break’ process forwards, might allow earlier titration of sedation to target levels – an ‘early sedation cessation’ (ESC). METHODS: We commenced a quality improvement project with the primary outcome being to stop sedation completely, within 4 h of ICU admission, in 95% of eligible patients. This was done by small, step-wise tests of change. No ethical approval was required. FINDINGS: Between 1 February 2014 and 31 January 2018, 1787 intubated patients were included. 1052 received an ‘ESC’ within 4 h (‘Yes’), 545 were excluded (‘Excluded’), and 190 were inadvertently omitted from ‘ESC’ (‘No’). The primary aim was achieved for the first time after 12 months. Compared to the ‘Yes’ group, the ‘Excluded’ group received 38% more propofol in the first 48 h of admission (IRR 1.38 (1.31–1.47), p<0.001), while the ‘No’ group received 32% more (IRR 1.32 (1.22–1.43), p<0.001). At four hours, 19·6% (12·9–27·9) of the ‘Yes’ group had attained a target RASS of -1, 0 or 1, compared to 13·6% (8·0–21·0) of those in the ‘No’ group. This proportion increased to 55·6% (46·1–64·9) at 24 h compared with 44·9% (35·6–54·4) in the ‘No’ group. INTERPRETATION: Ceasing sedative infusions as soon as possible, is safe and feasible, in both medical and surgical patients, and can be implemented into ‘real life’ with no additional staffing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7564524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75645242020-10-20 The effects of sedation cessation within the first four hours of intensive care unit admission in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients – a quality improvement study Cuthill, Jennifer A. Jarvie, Lyndsey McGovern, Christopher Shaw, Martin EClinicalMedicine Research Paper BACKGROUND: Early deep sedation in mechanically ventilated patients during the first 48 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission can be associated with adverse outcomes. We hypothesised that moving the ‘daily sedation break’ process forwards, might allow earlier titration of sedation to target levels – an ‘early sedation cessation’ (ESC). METHODS: We commenced a quality improvement project with the primary outcome being to stop sedation completely, within 4 h of ICU admission, in 95% of eligible patients. This was done by small, step-wise tests of change. No ethical approval was required. FINDINGS: Between 1 February 2014 and 31 January 2018, 1787 intubated patients were included. 1052 received an ‘ESC’ within 4 h (‘Yes’), 545 were excluded (‘Excluded’), and 190 were inadvertently omitted from ‘ESC’ (‘No’). The primary aim was achieved for the first time after 12 months. Compared to the ‘Yes’ group, the ‘Excluded’ group received 38% more propofol in the first 48 h of admission (IRR 1.38 (1.31–1.47), p<0.001), while the ‘No’ group received 32% more (IRR 1.32 (1.22–1.43), p<0.001). At four hours, 19·6% (12·9–27·9) of the ‘Yes’ group had attained a target RASS of -1, 0 or 1, compared to 13·6% (8·0–21·0) of those in the ‘No’ group. This proportion increased to 55·6% (46·1–64·9) at 24 h compared with 44·9% (35·6–54·4) in the ‘No’ group. INTERPRETATION: Ceasing sedative infusions as soon as possible, is safe and feasible, in both medical and surgical patients, and can be implemented into ‘real life’ with no additional staffing. Elsevier 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7564524/ /pubmed/33089117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100486 Text en Crown Copyright © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Cuthill, Jennifer A.
Jarvie, Lyndsey
McGovern, Christopher
Shaw, Martin
The effects of sedation cessation within the first four hours of intensive care unit admission in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients – a quality improvement study
title The effects of sedation cessation within the first four hours of intensive care unit admission in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients – a quality improvement study
title_full The effects of sedation cessation within the first four hours of intensive care unit admission in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients – a quality improvement study
title_fullStr The effects of sedation cessation within the first four hours of intensive care unit admission in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients – a quality improvement study
title_full_unstemmed The effects of sedation cessation within the first four hours of intensive care unit admission in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients – a quality improvement study
title_short The effects of sedation cessation within the first four hours of intensive care unit admission in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients – a quality improvement study
title_sort effects of sedation cessation within the first four hours of intensive care unit admission in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients – a quality improvement study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100486
work_keys_str_mv AT cuthilljennifera theeffectsofsedationcessationwithinthefirstfourhoursofintensivecareunitadmissioninmechanicallyventilatedcriticallyillpatientsaqualityimprovementstudy
AT jarvielyndsey theeffectsofsedationcessationwithinthefirstfourhoursofintensivecareunitadmissioninmechanicallyventilatedcriticallyillpatientsaqualityimprovementstudy
AT mcgovernchristopher theeffectsofsedationcessationwithinthefirstfourhoursofintensivecareunitadmissioninmechanicallyventilatedcriticallyillpatientsaqualityimprovementstudy
AT shawmartin theeffectsofsedationcessationwithinthefirstfourhoursofintensivecareunitadmissioninmechanicallyventilatedcriticallyillpatientsaqualityimprovementstudy
AT cuthilljennifera effectsofsedationcessationwithinthefirstfourhoursofintensivecareunitadmissioninmechanicallyventilatedcriticallyillpatientsaqualityimprovementstudy
AT jarvielyndsey effectsofsedationcessationwithinthefirstfourhoursofintensivecareunitadmissioninmechanicallyventilatedcriticallyillpatientsaqualityimprovementstudy
AT mcgovernchristopher effectsofsedationcessationwithinthefirstfourhoursofintensivecareunitadmissioninmechanicallyventilatedcriticallyillpatientsaqualityimprovementstudy
AT shawmartin effectsofsedationcessationwithinthefirstfourhoursofintensivecareunitadmissioninmechanicallyventilatedcriticallyillpatientsaqualityimprovementstudy