Cargando…
Determining Equine Influenza Virus Vaccine Efficacy—The Specific Contribution of Strain Versus Other Vaccine Attributes
Vaccination is an effective tool to limit equine influenza virus (EIV H3N8) infection, a contagious respiratory disease with potentially huge economic impact. The study assessed the effects of antigenic change on vaccine efficacy and the need for strain update. Horses were vaccinated (V1 and V2) wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32899189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8030501 |
_version_ | 1783595783541489664 |
---|---|
author | Reemers, Sylvia Sonnemans, Denny Horspool, Linda van Bommel, Sander Cao, Qi van de Zande, Saskia |
author_facet | Reemers, Sylvia Sonnemans, Denny Horspool, Linda van Bommel, Sander Cao, Qi van de Zande, Saskia |
author_sort | Reemers, Sylvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vaccination is an effective tool to limit equine influenza virus (EIV H3N8) infection, a contagious respiratory disease with potentially huge economic impact. The study assessed the effects of antigenic change on vaccine efficacy and the need for strain update. Horses were vaccinated (V1 and V2) with an ISCOMatrix-adjuvanted, whole inactivated virus vaccine (Equilis Prequenza, group 2, FC1 and European strains) or a carbomer-adjuvanted, modified vector vaccine (ProteqFlu, group 3, FC1 and FC2 HA genes). Serology (SRH, HI, VN), clinical signs and viral shedding were assessed in comparison to unvaccinated control horses. The hypothesis was that group 2 (no FC2 vaccine strain) would be less well protected than group 3 following experimental infection with a recent FC2 field strain (A/equi-2/Wexford/14) 4.5 months after vaccination. All vaccinated horses had antibody titres to FC1 and FC2. After challenge, serology increased more markedly in group 3 than in group 2. Vaccinated horses had significantly lower total clinical scores and viral shedding. Unexpectedly, viral RNA shedding was significantly lower in group 2 than in group 3. Vaccination induced protective antibody titres to FC1 and FC2 and reduced clinical signs and viral shedding. The two tested vaccines provided equivalent protection against a recent FC2 EIV field strain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7564743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75647432020-10-26 Determining Equine Influenza Virus Vaccine Efficacy—The Specific Contribution of Strain Versus Other Vaccine Attributes Reemers, Sylvia Sonnemans, Denny Horspool, Linda van Bommel, Sander Cao, Qi van de Zande, Saskia Vaccines (Basel) Article Vaccination is an effective tool to limit equine influenza virus (EIV H3N8) infection, a contagious respiratory disease with potentially huge economic impact. The study assessed the effects of antigenic change on vaccine efficacy and the need for strain update. Horses were vaccinated (V1 and V2) with an ISCOMatrix-adjuvanted, whole inactivated virus vaccine (Equilis Prequenza, group 2, FC1 and European strains) or a carbomer-adjuvanted, modified vector vaccine (ProteqFlu, group 3, FC1 and FC2 HA genes). Serology (SRH, HI, VN), clinical signs and viral shedding were assessed in comparison to unvaccinated control horses. The hypothesis was that group 2 (no FC2 vaccine strain) would be less well protected than group 3 following experimental infection with a recent FC2 field strain (A/equi-2/Wexford/14) 4.5 months after vaccination. All vaccinated horses had antibody titres to FC1 and FC2. After challenge, serology increased more markedly in group 3 than in group 2. Vaccinated horses had significantly lower total clinical scores and viral shedding. Unexpectedly, viral RNA shedding was significantly lower in group 2 than in group 3. Vaccination induced protective antibody titres to FC1 and FC2 and reduced clinical signs and viral shedding. The two tested vaccines provided equivalent protection against a recent FC2 EIV field strain. MDPI 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7564743/ /pubmed/32899189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8030501 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Reemers, Sylvia Sonnemans, Denny Horspool, Linda van Bommel, Sander Cao, Qi van de Zande, Saskia Determining Equine Influenza Virus Vaccine Efficacy—The Specific Contribution of Strain Versus Other Vaccine Attributes |
title | Determining Equine Influenza Virus Vaccine Efficacy—The Specific Contribution of Strain Versus Other Vaccine Attributes |
title_full | Determining Equine Influenza Virus Vaccine Efficacy—The Specific Contribution of Strain Versus Other Vaccine Attributes |
title_fullStr | Determining Equine Influenza Virus Vaccine Efficacy—The Specific Contribution of Strain Versus Other Vaccine Attributes |
title_full_unstemmed | Determining Equine Influenza Virus Vaccine Efficacy—The Specific Contribution of Strain Versus Other Vaccine Attributes |
title_short | Determining Equine Influenza Virus Vaccine Efficacy—The Specific Contribution of Strain Versus Other Vaccine Attributes |
title_sort | determining equine influenza virus vaccine efficacy—the specific contribution of strain versus other vaccine attributes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32899189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8030501 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reemerssylvia determiningequineinfluenzavirusvaccineefficacythespecificcontributionofstrainversusothervaccineattributes AT sonnemansdenny determiningequineinfluenzavirusvaccineefficacythespecificcontributionofstrainversusothervaccineattributes AT horspoollinda determiningequineinfluenzavirusvaccineefficacythespecificcontributionofstrainversusothervaccineattributes AT vanbommelsander determiningequineinfluenzavirusvaccineefficacythespecificcontributionofstrainversusothervaccineattributes AT caoqi determiningequineinfluenzavirusvaccineefficacythespecificcontributionofstrainversusothervaccineattributes AT vandezandesaskia determiningequineinfluenzavirusvaccineefficacythespecificcontributionofstrainversusothervaccineattributes |