Cargando…

Pre- and Post-Surgical Dysphagia in Adults with Tumors of the Posterior Fossa: A Prospective Blinded Study

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Dysphagia is a known complication of posterior fossa tumor resection, but data regarding risk factors and clinical course are sparse, in particular in adults. The purpose of this study was to investigate frequency, severity and outcome of swallowing disorders in adults undergoing PFT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lapa, Sriramya, Quick-Weller, Johanna, Nasari, Christiane, Dziewas, Rainer, Gessler, Florian, Wagner, Marlies, Warnecke, Tobias, Hattingen, Elke, Seifert, Volker, Konczalla, Jürgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32916787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092561
Descripción
Sumario:SIMPLE SUMMARY: Dysphagia is a known complication of posterior fossa tumor resection, but data regarding risk factors and clinical course are sparse, in particular in adults. The purpose of this study was to investigate frequency, severity and outcome of swallowing disorders in adults undergoing PFT-surgery to improve presurgical counseling and postsurgical therapeutic care. Our findings demonstrate that dysphagia is a frequent finding before and after surgery putting patients at risk for aspiration and pneumonia. We provide clinical predictors which might be helpful in identifying dysphagic patients in order to determine the safest feeding route. This might lead to both improvement of outcome and reduction of medical complication. ABSTRACT: Background: While swallowing disorders are frequent sequela following posterior fossa tumor (PFT) surgery in children, data on dysphagia frequency, severity, and outcome in adults are lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate dysphagia before and after surgical removal of PFT. Additionally, we tried to identify clinical predictors for postsurgical swallowing disorders. Furthermore, this study explored the three-month outcome of dysphagic patients. Methods: In a cohort of patients undergoing PFT surgery, dysphagia was prospectively assessed pre- and postoperatively using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Patients with severe dysphagia at discharge were re-evaluated after three months. Additionally, clinical and imaging data were collected to identify predictors for post-surgical dysphagia. Results: We included 26 patients of whom 15 had pre-operative swallowing disorders. After surgery, worsening of pre-existing dysphagia could be noticed in 7 patients whereas improvement was observed in 2 and full recovery in 3 subjects. New-onset dysphagia after surgery occurred in a minority of 3 cases. Postoperatively, 47% of dysphagic patients required nasogastric tube feeding. Re-evaluation after three months of follow-up revealed that all dysphagic patients had returned to full oral intake. Conclusion: Dysphagia is a frequent finding in patients with PFT already before surgery. Surgical intervention can infer a deterioration of impaired swallowing function placing affected patients at temporary risk for aspiration. In contrast, surgery can also accomplish beneficial results resulting in both improvement and full recovery. Overall, our findings show the need of early dysphagia assessment to define the safest feeding route for the patient.