Cargando…

Psychologists’ experience of a malpractice complaint: Their relationship with and processes at the regulator

BACKGROUND: Professional malpractice complaints in the South African health arena have increased over the last decade. There is a lack of research on how South African health practitioners experience professional malpractice complaints and complaint processes. AIM: This article reports on one aspect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirkcaldy, Hanlé, van Rensburg, Esmé, du Plooy, Kobus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101716
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v25i0.1384
_version_ 1783595822334607360
author Kirkcaldy, Hanlé
van Rensburg, Esmé
du Plooy, Kobus
author_facet Kirkcaldy, Hanlé
van Rensburg, Esmé
du Plooy, Kobus
author_sort Kirkcaldy, Hanlé
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Professional malpractice complaints in the South African health arena have increased over the last decade. There is a lack of research on how South African health practitioners experience professional malpractice complaints and complaint processes. AIM: This article reports on one aspect of the findings in a more extensive study relating to the complaint experience of psychology practitioners, namely how a group of psychology practitioners experienced their relationship with and the processes at the regulator during a malpractice complaint. The regulator refers to the professional registration body which manages complaints against practitioners. SETTING: The study included 10 registered South African psychologists who experienced a malpractice complaint. METHODS: After sampling, semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio-recorded and transcribed. The data were managed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to elicit the personal, subjective experience of the individual participants. FINDINGS: Two superordinate themes and related subthemes emerged from the analysis. First, relating to the experience of the complaint procedures and processes, participants experienced an extended timeframe for complaint management, a lack of communication during complaint management, legal challenges during some disciplinary proceedings and some complaints as unjustified and frivolous. Second, participants were unsure of their relationship with the regulator. Their responses denoted instances of vulnerability and inequality during proceedings. CONCLUSIONS: The findings call for closer collaboration between the registration body and practitioners during complaints management, to eliminate vexatious complaints, to streamline processes and to encourage guidance of and support for the professional.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7564922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75649222020-10-22 Psychologists’ experience of a malpractice complaint: Their relationship with and processes at the regulator Kirkcaldy, Hanlé van Rensburg, Esmé du Plooy, Kobus Health SA Original Research BACKGROUND: Professional malpractice complaints in the South African health arena have increased over the last decade. There is a lack of research on how South African health practitioners experience professional malpractice complaints and complaint processes. AIM: This article reports on one aspect of the findings in a more extensive study relating to the complaint experience of psychology practitioners, namely how a group of psychology practitioners experienced their relationship with and the processes at the regulator during a malpractice complaint. The regulator refers to the professional registration body which manages complaints against practitioners. SETTING: The study included 10 registered South African psychologists who experienced a malpractice complaint. METHODS: After sampling, semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio-recorded and transcribed. The data were managed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to elicit the personal, subjective experience of the individual participants. FINDINGS: Two superordinate themes and related subthemes emerged from the analysis. First, relating to the experience of the complaint procedures and processes, participants experienced an extended timeframe for complaint management, a lack of communication during complaint management, legal challenges during some disciplinary proceedings and some complaints as unjustified and frivolous. Second, participants were unsure of their relationship with the regulator. Their responses denoted instances of vulnerability and inequality during proceedings. CONCLUSIONS: The findings call for closer collaboration between the registration body and practitioners during complaints management, to eliminate vexatious complaints, to streamline processes and to encourage guidance of and support for the professional. AOSIS 2020-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7564922/ /pubmed/33101716 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v25i0.1384 Text en © 2020. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kirkcaldy, Hanlé
van Rensburg, Esmé
du Plooy, Kobus
Psychologists’ experience of a malpractice complaint: Their relationship with and processes at the regulator
title Psychologists’ experience of a malpractice complaint: Their relationship with and processes at the regulator
title_full Psychologists’ experience of a malpractice complaint: Their relationship with and processes at the regulator
title_fullStr Psychologists’ experience of a malpractice complaint: Their relationship with and processes at the regulator
title_full_unstemmed Psychologists’ experience of a malpractice complaint: Their relationship with and processes at the regulator
title_short Psychologists’ experience of a malpractice complaint: Their relationship with and processes at the regulator
title_sort psychologists’ experience of a malpractice complaint: their relationship with and processes at the regulator
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101716
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v25i0.1384
work_keys_str_mv AT kirkcaldyhanle psychologistsexperienceofamalpracticecomplainttheirrelationshipwithandprocessesattheregulator
AT vanrensburgesme psychologistsexperienceofamalpracticecomplainttheirrelationshipwithandprocessesattheregulator
AT duplooykobus psychologistsexperienceofamalpracticecomplainttheirrelationshipwithandprocessesattheregulator