Cargando…

Serological detection of brucellosis among febrile, malaria-negative children and domesticated dogs in an urban African setting

BACKGROUND: Childhood brucellosis and malaria are co-endemic febrile illnesses in some sub-Saharan African countries. Malaria and brucellosis co-infection or brucellosis sole infections are often missed due to an over emphasis on malaria and the lack of appropriate diagnostic infrastructure. Brucell...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalule, John B., Tomusange, Joseph, Namatovu, Teddy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33102165
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v9i1.864
_version_ 1783595828440465408
author Kalule, John B.
Tomusange, Joseph
Namatovu, Teddy
author_facet Kalule, John B.
Tomusange, Joseph
Namatovu, Teddy
author_sort Kalule, John B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Childhood brucellosis and malaria are co-endemic febrile illnesses in some sub-Saharan African countries. Malaria and brucellosis co-infection or brucellosis sole infections are often missed due to an over emphasis on malaria and the lack of appropriate diagnostic infrastructure. Brucellosis in dogs is usually overlooked and yet there is extensive contact between humans and their pets. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated brucellosis in children and dogs using a confirmatory serological testing series that screens for three Brucella sp. METHODS: Residual blood samples from malaria smear-negative febrile children were collected and tested for Brucella sp and malaria parasite. During the same period, residual blood samples presented to a veterinary microbiology laboratory in the same area were tested for brucellosis using the same approach. RESULTS: A total of 105 human and 80 canine blood samples were tested for brucellosis antibodies. The seroprevalence of brucellosis was 22.86% (25/105) in children and 1.3% (1/80) in dogs using the Card, buffered acidified plate antigen, and standard plate agglutination tests but was 0% using the rivanol precipitation plate agglutination test. CONCLUSION: Given that brucellosis can be caused by both smooth and rough colony strains, there is a need to modify the current serological surveillance strategy (targeted at only Brucella abortus and other smooth colony Brucella strains) to figure out the relative contribution of rough colony Brucella strains (B. ovis and B. canis). Since Uganda is endemic for brucellosis there is a need to modify the brucellosis surveillance strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7564948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75649482020-10-22 Serological detection of brucellosis among febrile, malaria-negative children and domesticated dogs in an urban African setting Kalule, John B. Tomusange, Joseph Namatovu, Teddy Afr J Lab Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Childhood brucellosis and malaria are co-endemic febrile illnesses in some sub-Saharan African countries. Malaria and brucellosis co-infection or brucellosis sole infections are often missed due to an over emphasis on malaria and the lack of appropriate diagnostic infrastructure. Brucellosis in dogs is usually overlooked and yet there is extensive contact between humans and their pets. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated brucellosis in children and dogs using a confirmatory serological testing series that screens for three Brucella sp. METHODS: Residual blood samples from malaria smear-negative febrile children were collected and tested for Brucella sp and malaria parasite. During the same period, residual blood samples presented to a veterinary microbiology laboratory in the same area were tested for brucellosis using the same approach. RESULTS: A total of 105 human and 80 canine blood samples were tested for brucellosis antibodies. The seroprevalence of brucellosis was 22.86% (25/105) in children and 1.3% (1/80) in dogs using the Card, buffered acidified plate antigen, and standard plate agglutination tests but was 0% using the rivanol precipitation plate agglutination test. CONCLUSION: Given that brucellosis can be caused by both smooth and rough colony strains, there is a need to modify the current serological surveillance strategy (targeted at only Brucella abortus and other smooth colony Brucella strains) to figure out the relative contribution of rough colony Brucella strains (B. ovis and B. canis). Since Uganda is endemic for brucellosis there is a need to modify the brucellosis surveillance strategy. AOSIS 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7564948/ /pubmed/33102165 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v9i1.864 Text en © 2020. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kalule, John B.
Tomusange, Joseph
Namatovu, Teddy
Serological detection of brucellosis among febrile, malaria-negative children and domesticated dogs in an urban African setting
title Serological detection of brucellosis among febrile, malaria-negative children and domesticated dogs in an urban African setting
title_full Serological detection of brucellosis among febrile, malaria-negative children and domesticated dogs in an urban African setting
title_fullStr Serological detection of brucellosis among febrile, malaria-negative children and domesticated dogs in an urban African setting
title_full_unstemmed Serological detection of brucellosis among febrile, malaria-negative children and domesticated dogs in an urban African setting
title_short Serological detection of brucellosis among febrile, malaria-negative children and domesticated dogs in an urban African setting
title_sort serological detection of brucellosis among febrile, malaria-negative children and domesticated dogs in an urban african setting
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33102165
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v9i1.864
work_keys_str_mv AT kalulejohnb serologicaldetectionofbrucellosisamongfebrilemalarianegativechildrenanddomesticateddogsinanurbanafricansetting
AT tomusangejoseph serologicaldetectionofbrucellosisamongfebrilemalarianegativechildrenanddomesticateddogsinanurbanafricansetting
AT namatovuteddy serologicaldetectionofbrucellosisamongfebrilemalarianegativechildrenanddomesticateddogsinanurbanafricansetting