Cargando…
Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability
Insertion energy has been advocated as a novel measure for primary implant stability, but the effect of implant length, diameter, or surgical protocol remains unclear. Twenty implants from one specific bone level implant system were placed in layered polyurethane foam measuring maximum insertion tor...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32942697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092977 |
_version_ | 1783595866680983552 |
---|---|
author | Grobecker-Karl, Tanja Dickinson, Anthony Heckmann, Siegfried Karl, Matthias Steiner, Constanze |
author_facet | Grobecker-Karl, Tanja Dickinson, Anthony Heckmann, Siegfried Karl, Matthias Steiner, Constanze |
author_sort | Grobecker-Karl, Tanja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Insertion energy has been advocated as a novel measure for primary implant stability, but the effect of implant length, diameter, or surgical protocol remains unclear. Twenty implants from one specific bone level implant system were placed in layered polyurethane foam measuring maximum insertion torque, torque–time curves, and primary stability using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Insertion energy was calculated as area under torque–time curve applying the trapezoidal formula. Statistical analysis was based on analysis of variance, Tukey honest differences tests and Pearson’s product moment correlation tests (α = 0.05). Implant stability (p = 0.01) and insertion energy (p < 0.01) differed significantly among groups, while maximum insertion torque did not (p = 0.17). Short implants showed a significant decrease in implant stability (p = 0.01), while reducing implant diameter did not cause any significant effect. Applying the drilling protocol for dense bone resulted in significantly increased insertion energy (p = 0.02) but a significant decrease in implant stability (p = 0.04). Insertion energy was not found to be a more reliable parameter for evaluating primary implant stability when compared to maximum insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7565125 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75651252020-10-26 Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability Grobecker-Karl, Tanja Dickinson, Anthony Heckmann, Siegfried Karl, Matthias Steiner, Constanze J Clin Med Article Insertion energy has been advocated as a novel measure for primary implant stability, but the effect of implant length, diameter, or surgical protocol remains unclear. Twenty implants from one specific bone level implant system were placed in layered polyurethane foam measuring maximum insertion torque, torque–time curves, and primary stability using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Insertion energy was calculated as area under torque–time curve applying the trapezoidal formula. Statistical analysis was based on analysis of variance, Tukey honest differences tests and Pearson’s product moment correlation tests (α = 0.05). Implant stability (p = 0.01) and insertion energy (p < 0.01) differed significantly among groups, while maximum insertion torque did not (p = 0.17). Short implants showed a significant decrease in implant stability (p = 0.01), while reducing implant diameter did not cause any significant effect. Applying the drilling protocol for dense bone resulted in significantly increased insertion energy (p = 0.02) but a significant decrease in implant stability (p = 0.04). Insertion energy was not found to be a more reliable parameter for evaluating primary implant stability when compared to maximum insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis. MDPI 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7565125/ /pubmed/32942697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092977 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Grobecker-Karl, Tanja Dickinson, Anthony Heckmann, Siegfried Karl, Matthias Steiner, Constanze Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability |
title | Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability |
title_full | Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability |
title_short | Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability |
title_sort | evaluation of insertion energy as novel parameter for dental implant stability |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32942697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092977 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grobeckerkarltanja evaluationofinsertionenergyasnovelparameterfordentalimplantstability AT dickinsonanthony evaluationofinsertionenergyasnovelparameterfordentalimplantstability AT heckmannsiegfried evaluationofinsertionenergyasnovelparameterfordentalimplantstability AT karlmatthias evaluationofinsertionenergyasnovelparameterfordentalimplantstability AT steinerconstanze evaluationofinsertionenergyasnovelparameterfordentalimplantstability |