Cargando…

Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability

Insertion energy has been advocated as a novel measure for primary implant stability, but the effect of implant length, diameter, or surgical protocol remains unclear. Twenty implants from one specific bone level implant system were placed in layered polyurethane foam measuring maximum insertion tor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grobecker-Karl, Tanja, Dickinson, Anthony, Heckmann, Siegfried, Karl, Matthias, Steiner, Constanze
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32942697
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092977
_version_ 1783595866680983552
author Grobecker-Karl, Tanja
Dickinson, Anthony
Heckmann, Siegfried
Karl, Matthias
Steiner, Constanze
author_facet Grobecker-Karl, Tanja
Dickinson, Anthony
Heckmann, Siegfried
Karl, Matthias
Steiner, Constanze
author_sort Grobecker-Karl, Tanja
collection PubMed
description Insertion energy has been advocated as a novel measure for primary implant stability, but the effect of implant length, diameter, or surgical protocol remains unclear. Twenty implants from one specific bone level implant system were placed in layered polyurethane foam measuring maximum insertion torque, torque–time curves, and primary stability using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Insertion energy was calculated as area under torque–time curve applying the trapezoidal formula. Statistical analysis was based on analysis of variance, Tukey honest differences tests and Pearson’s product moment correlation tests (α = 0.05). Implant stability (p = 0.01) and insertion energy (p < 0.01) differed significantly among groups, while maximum insertion torque did not (p = 0.17). Short implants showed a significant decrease in implant stability (p = 0.01), while reducing implant diameter did not cause any significant effect. Applying the drilling protocol for dense bone resulted in significantly increased insertion energy (p = 0.02) but a significant decrease in implant stability (p = 0.04). Insertion energy was not found to be a more reliable parameter for evaluating primary implant stability when compared to maximum insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7565125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75651252020-10-26 Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability Grobecker-Karl, Tanja Dickinson, Anthony Heckmann, Siegfried Karl, Matthias Steiner, Constanze J Clin Med Article Insertion energy has been advocated as a novel measure for primary implant stability, but the effect of implant length, diameter, or surgical protocol remains unclear. Twenty implants from one specific bone level implant system were placed in layered polyurethane foam measuring maximum insertion torque, torque–time curves, and primary stability using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Insertion energy was calculated as area under torque–time curve applying the trapezoidal formula. Statistical analysis was based on analysis of variance, Tukey honest differences tests and Pearson’s product moment correlation tests (α = 0.05). Implant stability (p = 0.01) and insertion energy (p < 0.01) differed significantly among groups, while maximum insertion torque did not (p = 0.17). Short implants showed a significant decrease in implant stability (p = 0.01), while reducing implant diameter did not cause any significant effect. Applying the drilling protocol for dense bone resulted in significantly increased insertion energy (p = 0.02) but a significant decrease in implant stability (p = 0.04). Insertion energy was not found to be a more reliable parameter for evaluating primary implant stability when compared to maximum insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis. MDPI 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7565125/ /pubmed/32942697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092977 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Grobecker-Karl, Tanja
Dickinson, Anthony
Heckmann, Siegfried
Karl, Matthias
Steiner, Constanze
Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability
title Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability
title_full Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability
title_fullStr Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability
title_short Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability
title_sort evaluation of insertion energy as novel parameter for dental implant stability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32942697
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092977
work_keys_str_mv AT grobeckerkarltanja evaluationofinsertionenergyasnovelparameterfordentalimplantstability
AT dickinsonanthony evaluationofinsertionenergyasnovelparameterfordentalimplantstability
AT heckmannsiegfried evaluationofinsertionenergyasnovelparameterfordentalimplantstability
AT karlmatthias evaluationofinsertionenergyasnovelparameterfordentalimplantstability
AT steinerconstanze evaluationofinsertionenergyasnovelparameterfordentalimplantstability