Cargando…

Rubella Vaccine Introduction in the South African Public Vaccination Schedule: Mathematical Modelling for Decision Making

Background: age structured mathematical models have been used to evaluate the impact of rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) introduction into existing measles vaccination programs in several countries. South Africa has a well-established measles vaccination program and is considering RCV introduction....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen, Edoka, Ijeoma, Wiysonge, Charles S., Metcalf, C. Jessica E., Winter, Amy K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32668819
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8030383
_version_ 1783595883434082304
author Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen
Edoka, Ijeoma
Wiysonge, Charles S.
Metcalf, C. Jessica E.
Winter, Amy K.
author_facet Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen
Edoka, Ijeoma
Wiysonge, Charles S.
Metcalf, C. Jessica E.
Winter, Amy K.
author_sort Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen
collection PubMed
description Background: age structured mathematical models have been used to evaluate the impact of rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) introduction into existing measles vaccination programs in several countries. South Africa has a well-established measles vaccination program and is considering RCV introduction. This study aimed to provide a comparison of different scenarios and their relative costs within the context of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) reduction or elimination. Methods: we used a previously published age-structured deterministic discrete time rubella transmission model. We obtained estimates of vaccine costs from the South African medicines price registry and the World Health Organization. We simulated RCV introduction and extracted estimates of rubella incidence, CRS incidence and effective reproductive number over 30 years. Results: compared to scenarios without mass campaigns, scenarios including mass campaigns resulted in more rapid elimination of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). Routine vaccination at 12 months of age coupled with vaccination of nine-year-old children was associated with the lowest RCV cost per CRS case averted for a similar percentage CRS reduction. Conclusion: At 80% RCV coverage, all vaccine introduction scenarios would achieve rubella and CRS elimination in South Africa. Any RCV introduction strategy should consider a combination of routine vaccination in the primary immunization series and additional vaccination of older children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7565203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75652032020-10-26 Rubella Vaccine Introduction in the South African Public Vaccination Schedule: Mathematical Modelling for Decision Making Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen Edoka, Ijeoma Wiysonge, Charles S. Metcalf, C. Jessica E. Winter, Amy K. Vaccines (Basel) Article Background: age structured mathematical models have been used to evaluate the impact of rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) introduction into existing measles vaccination programs in several countries. South Africa has a well-established measles vaccination program and is considering RCV introduction. This study aimed to provide a comparison of different scenarios and their relative costs within the context of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) reduction or elimination. Methods: we used a previously published age-structured deterministic discrete time rubella transmission model. We obtained estimates of vaccine costs from the South African medicines price registry and the World Health Organization. We simulated RCV introduction and extracted estimates of rubella incidence, CRS incidence and effective reproductive number over 30 years. Results: compared to scenarios without mass campaigns, scenarios including mass campaigns resulted in more rapid elimination of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). Routine vaccination at 12 months of age coupled with vaccination of nine-year-old children was associated with the lowest RCV cost per CRS case averted for a similar percentage CRS reduction. Conclusion: At 80% RCV coverage, all vaccine introduction scenarios would achieve rubella and CRS elimination in South Africa. Any RCV introduction strategy should consider a combination of routine vaccination in the primary immunization series and additional vaccination of older children. MDPI 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7565203/ /pubmed/32668819 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8030383 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen
Edoka, Ijeoma
Wiysonge, Charles S.
Metcalf, C. Jessica E.
Winter, Amy K.
Rubella Vaccine Introduction in the South African Public Vaccination Schedule: Mathematical Modelling for Decision Making
title Rubella Vaccine Introduction in the South African Public Vaccination Schedule: Mathematical Modelling for Decision Making
title_full Rubella Vaccine Introduction in the South African Public Vaccination Schedule: Mathematical Modelling for Decision Making
title_fullStr Rubella Vaccine Introduction in the South African Public Vaccination Schedule: Mathematical Modelling for Decision Making
title_full_unstemmed Rubella Vaccine Introduction in the South African Public Vaccination Schedule: Mathematical Modelling for Decision Making
title_short Rubella Vaccine Introduction in the South African Public Vaccination Schedule: Mathematical Modelling for Decision Making
title_sort rubella vaccine introduction in the south african public vaccination schedule: mathematical modelling for decision making
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32668819
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8030383
work_keys_str_mv AT motazenkengafacvillyen rubellavaccineintroductioninthesouthafricanpublicvaccinationschedulemathematicalmodellingfordecisionmaking
AT edokaijeoma rubellavaccineintroductioninthesouthafricanpublicvaccinationschedulemathematicalmodellingfordecisionmaking
AT wiysongecharless rubellavaccineintroductioninthesouthafricanpublicvaccinationschedulemathematicalmodellingfordecisionmaking
AT metcalfcjessicae rubellavaccineintroductioninthesouthafricanpublicvaccinationschedulemathematicalmodellingfordecisionmaking
AT winteramyk rubellavaccineintroductioninthesouthafricanpublicvaccinationschedulemathematicalmodellingfordecisionmaking