Cargando…

Thromboprophylaxis for Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease—Are We There Yet?

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) events in both hospitalized patients and outpatients. Although thromboprophylaxis is recommended for hospitalized patients with IBD, implementation is not universal, especially for non IBD-related hospita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levartovsky, Asaf, Barash, Yiftach, Ben-Horin, Shomron, Ungar, Bella, Klang, Eyal, Soffer, Shelly, Kopylov, Uri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32858826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092753
_version_ 1783595967939870720
author Levartovsky, Asaf
Barash, Yiftach
Ben-Horin, Shomron
Ungar, Bella
Klang, Eyal
Soffer, Shelly
Kopylov, Uri
author_facet Levartovsky, Asaf
Barash, Yiftach
Ben-Horin, Shomron
Ungar, Bella
Klang, Eyal
Soffer, Shelly
Kopylov, Uri
author_sort Levartovsky, Asaf
collection PubMed
description Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) events in both hospitalized patients and outpatients. Although thromboprophylaxis is recommended for hospitalized patients with IBD, implementation is not universal, especially for non IBD-related hospitalizations. Our objective was to present VTE and thromboprophylaxis adherence rates among hospitalized patients with IBD. An electronic data repository was created of all patients with IBD who visited the emergency department (ED) of our tertiary medical center between 2012 and 2018. The data included tabular variables and free-text physician records. We searched the data for VTE events, using ICD10 coding. Overall, there were 7009 ED visits of 2405 patients with IBD, 1556 (64.7%) with Crohn’s disease (CD) and 849 (35.3%) with ulcerative colitis (UC). Thromboprophylaxis was administered in 463 hospitalizations (12.4% of IBD-related and 10.9% of non IBD-related hospitalizations, p = 0.13). Nineteen VTEs were diagnosed in the ED and seventeen were diagnosed during hospitalization (11 non IBD-related and 6 IBD-related hospitalizations, 0.6% and 0.28% respectively, p = 0.12). One patient died during hospitalization and an additional two in the 90 days post-discharge from hospitalization (unrelated to VTEs). In conclusion, thromboprophylaxis rates in hospitalized patients with IBD are low, despite possible implications and established guidelines. Thromboprophylaxis should be implemented in patients with IBD hospitalized for all indications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7565590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75655902020-10-26 Thromboprophylaxis for Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease—Are We There Yet? Levartovsky, Asaf Barash, Yiftach Ben-Horin, Shomron Ungar, Bella Klang, Eyal Soffer, Shelly Kopylov, Uri J Clin Med Article Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) events in both hospitalized patients and outpatients. Although thromboprophylaxis is recommended for hospitalized patients with IBD, implementation is not universal, especially for non IBD-related hospitalizations. Our objective was to present VTE and thromboprophylaxis adherence rates among hospitalized patients with IBD. An electronic data repository was created of all patients with IBD who visited the emergency department (ED) of our tertiary medical center between 2012 and 2018. The data included tabular variables and free-text physician records. We searched the data for VTE events, using ICD10 coding. Overall, there were 7009 ED visits of 2405 patients with IBD, 1556 (64.7%) with Crohn’s disease (CD) and 849 (35.3%) with ulcerative colitis (UC). Thromboprophylaxis was administered in 463 hospitalizations (12.4% of IBD-related and 10.9% of non IBD-related hospitalizations, p = 0.13). Nineteen VTEs were diagnosed in the ED and seventeen were diagnosed during hospitalization (11 non IBD-related and 6 IBD-related hospitalizations, 0.6% and 0.28% respectively, p = 0.12). One patient died during hospitalization and an additional two in the 90 days post-discharge from hospitalization (unrelated to VTEs). In conclusion, thromboprophylaxis rates in hospitalized patients with IBD are low, despite possible implications and established guidelines. Thromboprophylaxis should be implemented in patients with IBD hospitalized for all indications. MDPI 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7565590/ /pubmed/32858826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092753 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Levartovsky, Asaf
Barash, Yiftach
Ben-Horin, Shomron
Ungar, Bella
Klang, Eyal
Soffer, Shelly
Kopylov, Uri
Thromboprophylaxis for Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease—Are We There Yet?
title Thromboprophylaxis for Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease—Are We There Yet?
title_full Thromboprophylaxis for Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease—Are We There Yet?
title_fullStr Thromboprophylaxis for Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease—Are We There Yet?
title_full_unstemmed Thromboprophylaxis for Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease—Are We There Yet?
title_short Thromboprophylaxis for Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease—Are We There Yet?
title_sort thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease—are we there yet?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32858826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092753
work_keys_str_mv AT levartovskyasaf thromboprophylaxisforhospitalizedpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasearewethereyet
AT barashyiftach thromboprophylaxisforhospitalizedpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasearewethereyet
AT benhorinshomron thromboprophylaxisforhospitalizedpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasearewethereyet
AT ungarbella thromboprophylaxisforhospitalizedpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasearewethereyet
AT klangeyal thromboprophylaxisforhospitalizedpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasearewethereyet
AT soffershelly thromboprophylaxisforhospitalizedpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasearewethereyet
AT kopylovuri thromboprophylaxisforhospitalizedpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasearewethereyet