Cargando…

Organ-Sparing Surgery in Testicular Tumor: Is This the Right Approach for Lesions ≤ 20 mm?

Background: This study was conducted in order to analyze factors predicting malignancy in patients undergoing organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for small testicular lesions. Methods: Patients with small (≤20 mm) marker-negative clinical stage I testicular tumors were managed by OSS with tumor enucleation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staudacher, Nina, Tulchiner, Gennadi, Bates, Katie, Ladurner, Michael, Kafka, Mona, Aigner, Friedrich, Pichler, Renate, Horninger, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917055
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092911
_version_ 1783595971538583552
author Staudacher, Nina
Tulchiner, Gennadi
Bates, Katie
Ladurner, Michael
Kafka, Mona
Aigner, Friedrich
Pichler, Renate
Horninger, Wolfgang
author_facet Staudacher, Nina
Tulchiner, Gennadi
Bates, Katie
Ladurner, Michael
Kafka, Mona
Aigner, Friedrich
Pichler, Renate
Horninger, Wolfgang
author_sort Staudacher, Nina
collection PubMed
description Background: This study was conducted in order to analyze factors predicting malignancy in patients undergoing organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for small testicular lesions. Methods: Patients with small (≤20 mm) marker-negative clinical stage I testicular tumors were managed by OSS with tumor enucleation and frozen section examination (FSE) for the past 15 years at our institution. Benign and malignant cases were compared, focusing on preoperative and postoperative lesion sizes. Results: Eighty-nine patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Ten (11.2%) of them were treated for synchronous bilateral tumors. Sixty-seven (67.7%) of ninety-nine lesions were benign, confirming a high concordance rate (98%) between FSE and final histology. Patients with benign tumors were significantly older than patients with malignant tumors (p = 0.026), and benign tumors were detected more frequently during urologic work-up of hormone disorders (p = 0.001). Preoperative tumor size was a strong predictor of malignancy (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.726; p < 0.001). According to the Youden index, the best cutoff to predict tumor dignity was 13.5 mm, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 53% and 85%, respectively. No cases of local recurrence or distant metastasis were confirmed after a median follow-up of 42 months. Conclusion: Our findings are consistent with previous reports, supporting an OSS approach in small testicular tumors whenever possible. Most tumors ≤ 20 mm were benign, and in the case of malignancy, OSS with FSE and consecutive orchiectomy is oncologically safe due to the high concordance rate of FSE and final histology, thus preventing a two-stage procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7565605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75656052020-10-26 Organ-Sparing Surgery in Testicular Tumor: Is This the Right Approach for Lesions ≤ 20 mm? Staudacher, Nina Tulchiner, Gennadi Bates, Katie Ladurner, Michael Kafka, Mona Aigner, Friedrich Pichler, Renate Horninger, Wolfgang J Clin Med Article Background: This study was conducted in order to analyze factors predicting malignancy in patients undergoing organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for small testicular lesions. Methods: Patients with small (≤20 mm) marker-negative clinical stage I testicular tumors were managed by OSS with tumor enucleation and frozen section examination (FSE) for the past 15 years at our institution. Benign and malignant cases were compared, focusing on preoperative and postoperative lesion sizes. Results: Eighty-nine patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Ten (11.2%) of them were treated for synchronous bilateral tumors. Sixty-seven (67.7%) of ninety-nine lesions were benign, confirming a high concordance rate (98%) between FSE and final histology. Patients with benign tumors were significantly older than patients with malignant tumors (p = 0.026), and benign tumors were detected more frequently during urologic work-up of hormone disorders (p = 0.001). Preoperative tumor size was a strong predictor of malignancy (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.726; p < 0.001). According to the Youden index, the best cutoff to predict tumor dignity was 13.5 mm, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 53% and 85%, respectively. No cases of local recurrence or distant metastasis were confirmed after a median follow-up of 42 months. Conclusion: Our findings are consistent with previous reports, supporting an OSS approach in small testicular tumors whenever possible. Most tumors ≤ 20 mm were benign, and in the case of malignancy, OSS with FSE and consecutive orchiectomy is oncologically safe due to the high concordance rate of FSE and final histology, thus preventing a two-stage procedure. MDPI 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7565605/ /pubmed/32917055 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092911 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Staudacher, Nina
Tulchiner, Gennadi
Bates, Katie
Ladurner, Michael
Kafka, Mona
Aigner, Friedrich
Pichler, Renate
Horninger, Wolfgang
Organ-Sparing Surgery in Testicular Tumor: Is This the Right Approach for Lesions ≤ 20 mm?
title Organ-Sparing Surgery in Testicular Tumor: Is This the Right Approach for Lesions ≤ 20 mm?
title_full Organ-Sparing Surgery in Testicular Tumor: Is This the Right Approach for Lesions ≤ 20 mm?
title_fullStr Organ-Sparing Surgery in Testicular Tumor: Is This the Right Approach for Lesions ≤ 20 mm?
title_full_unstemmed Organ-Sparing Surgery in Testicular Tumor: Is This the Right Approach for Lesions ≤ 20 mm?
title_short Organ-Sparing Surgery in Testicular Tumor: Is This the Right Approach for Lesions ≤ 20 mm?
title_sort organ-sparing surgery in testicular tumor: is this the right approach for lesions ≤ 20 mm?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917055
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092911
work_keys_str_mv AT staudachernina organsparingsurgeryintesticulartumoristhistherightapproachforlesions20mm
AT tulchinergennadi organsparingsurgeryintesticulartumoristhistherightapproachforlesions20mm
AT bateskatie organsparingsurgeryintesticulartumoristhistherightapproachforlesions20mm
AT ladurnermichael organsparingsurgeryintesticulartumoristhistherightapproachforlesions20mm
AT kafkamona organsparingsurgeryintesticulartumoristhistherightapproachforlesions20mm
AT aignerfriedrich organsparingsurgeryintesticulartumoristhistherightapproachforlesions20mm
AT pichlerrenate organsparingsurgeryintesticulartumoristhistherightapproachforlesions20mm
AT horningerwolfgang organsparingsurgeryintesticulartumoristhistherightapproachforlesions20mm