Cargando…

Strict bladder filling and rectal emptying during prostate SBRT: Does it make a dosimetric or clinical difference?

BACKGROUND: To evaluate inter-fractional variations in bladder and rectum during prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and determine dosimetric and clinical consequences. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with 510 computed tomography (CT) images were analyzed. Median prescription dose was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byun, David J., Gorovets, Daniel J., Jacobs, Lauren M., Happersett, Laura, Zhang, Pengpeng, Pei, Xin, Burleson, Sarah, Zhang, Zhigang, Hunt, Margie, McBride, Sean, Kollmeier, Marisa A., Zelefsky, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01681-6
_version_ 1783596001363230720
author Byun, David J.
Gorovets, Daniel J.
Jacobs, Lauren M.
Happersett, Laura
Zhang, Pengpeng
Pei, Xin
Burleson, Sarah
Zhang, Zhigang
Hunt, Margie
McBride, Sean
Kollmeier, Marisa A.
Zelefsky, Michael J.
author_facet Byun, David J.
Gorovets, Daniel J.
Jacobs, Lauren M.
Happersett, Laura
Zhang, Pengpeng
Pei, Xin
Burleson, Sarah
Zhang, Zhigang
Hunt, Margie
McBride, Sean
Kollmeier, Marisa A.
Zelefsky, Michael J.
author_sort Byun, David J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate inter-fractional variations in bladder and rectum during prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and determine dosimetric and clinical consequences. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with 510 computed tomography (CT) images were analyzed. Median prescription dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions. Patients were instructed to maintain a full bladder and empty rectum prior to simulation and each treatment. A single reviewer delineated organs at risk (OARs) on the simulation (Sim-CT) and Cone Beam CTs (CBCT) for analyses. RESULTS: Bladder and rectum volume reductions were observed throughout the course of SBRT, with largest mean reductions of 86.9 mL (19.0%) for bladder and 6.4 mL (8.7%) for rectum noted at fraction #5 compared to Sim-CT (P < 0.01). Higher initial Sim-CT bladder volumes were predictive for greater reduction in absolute bladder volume during treatment (ρ = − 0.69; P < 0.01). Over the course of SBRT, there was a small but significant increase in bladder mean dose (+ 4.5 ± 12.8%; P < 0.01) but no significant change in the D2cc (+ 0.8 ± 4.0%; P = 0.28). The mean bladder trigone displacement was in the anterior direction (+ 4.02 ± 6.59 mm) with a corresponding decrease in mean trigone dose (− 3.6 ± 9.6%; P < 0.01) and D2cc (− 6.2 ± 15.6%; P < 0.01). There was a small but significant increase in mean rectal dose (+ 7.0 ± 12.9%, P < 0.01) but a decrease in rectal D2cc (− 2.2 ± 10.1%; P = 0.04). No significant correlations were found between relative bladder volume changes, bladder trigone displacements, or rectum volume changes with rates of genitourinary or rectal toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Despite smaller than expected bladder and rectal volumes at the time of treatment compared to the planning scans, dosimetric impact was minimal and not predictive of detrimental clinical outcomes. These results cast doubt on the need for excessively strict bladder filling and rectal emptying protocols in the context of image guided prostate SBRT and prospective studies are needed to determine its necessity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7565753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75657532020-10-20 Strict bladder filling and rectal emptying during prostate SBRT: Does it make a dosimetric or clinical difference? Byun, David J. Gorovets, Daniel J. Jacobs, Lauren M. Happersett, Laura Zhang, Pengpeng Pei, Xin Burleson, Sarah Zhang, Zhigang Hunt, Margie McBride, Sean Kollmeier, Marisa A. Zelefsky, Michael J. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate inter-fractional variations in bladder and rectum during prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and determine dosimetric and clinical consequences. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with 510 computed tomography (CT) images were analyzed. Median prescription dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions. Patients were instructed to maintain a full bladder and empty rectum prior to simulation and each treatment. A single reviewer delineated organs at risk (OARs) on the simulation (Sim-CT) and Cone Beam CTs (CBCT) for analyses. RESULTS: Bladder and rectum volume reductions were observed throughout the course of SBRT, with largest mean reductions of 86.9 mL (19.0%) for bladder and 6.4 mL (8.7%) for rectum noted at fraction #5 compared to Sim-CT (P < 0.01). Higher initial Sim-CT bladder volumes were predictive for greater reduction in absolute bladder volume during treatment (ρ = − 0.69; P < 0.01). Over the course of SBRT, there was a small but significant increase in bladder mean dose (+ 4.5 ± 12.8%; P < 0.01) but no significant change in the D2cc (+ 0.8 ± 4.0%; P = 0.28). The mean bladder trigone displacement was in the anterior direction (+ 4.02 ± 6.59 mm) with a corresponding decrease in mean trigone dose (− 3.6 ± 9.6%; P < 0.01) and D2cc (− 6.2 ± 15.6%; P < 0.01). There was a small but significant increase in mean rectal dose (+ 7.0 ± 12.9%, P < 0.01) but a decrease in rectal D2cc (− 2.2 ± 10.1%; P = 0.04). No significant correlations were found between relative bladder volume changes, bladder trigone displacements, or rectum volume changes with rates of genitourinary or rectal toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Despite smaller than expected bladder and rectal volumes at the time of treatment compared to the planning scans, dosimetric impact was minimal and not predictive of detrimental clinical outcomes. These results cast doubt on the need for excessively strict bladder filling and rectal emptying protocols in the context of image guided prostate SBRT and prospective studies are needed to determine its necessity. BioMed Central 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7565753/ /pubmed/33066781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01681-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Byun, David J.
Gorovets, Daniel J.
Jacobs, Lauren M.
Happersett, Laura
Zhang, Pengpeng
Pei, Xin
Burleson, Sarah
Zhang, Zhigang
Hunt, Margie
McBride, Sean
Kollmeier, Marisa A.
Zelefsky, Michael J.
Strict bladder filling and rectal emptying during prostate SBRT: Does it make a dosimetric or clinical difference?
title Strict bladder filling and rectal emptying during prostate SBRT: Does it make a dosimetric or clinical difference?
title_full Strict bladder filling and rectal emptying during prostate SBRT: Does it make a dosimetric or clinical difference?
title_fullStr Strict bladder filling and rectal emptying during prostate SBRT: Does it make a dosimetric or clinical difference?
title_full_unstemmed Strict bladder filling and rectal emptying during prostate SBRT: Does it make a dosimetric or clinical difference?
title_short Strict bladder filling and rectal emptying during prostate SBRT: Does it make a dosimetric or clinical difference?
title_sort strict bladder filling and rectal emptying during prostate sbrt: does it make a dosimetric or clinical difference?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01681-6
work_keys_str_mv AT byundavidj strictbladderfillingandrectalemptyingduringprostatesbrtdoesitmakeadosimetricorclinicaldifference
AT gorovetsdanielj strictbladderfillingandrectalemptyingduringprostatesbrtdoesitmakeadosimetricorclinicaldifference
AT jacobslaurenm strictbladderfillingandrectalemptyingduringprostatesbrtdoesitmakeadosimetricorclinicaldifference
AT happersettlaura strictbladderfillingandrectalemptyingduringprostatesbrtdoesitmakeadosimetricorclinicaldifference
AT zhangpengpeng strictbladderfillingandrectalemptyingduringprostatesbrtdoesitmakeadosimetricorclinicaldifference
AT peixin strictbladderfillingandrectalemptyingduringprostatesbrtdoesitmakeadosimetricorclinicaldifference
AT burlesonsarah strictbladderfillingandrectalemptyingduringprostatesbrtdoesitmakeadosimetricorclinicaldifference
AT zhangzhigang strictbladderfillingandrectalemptyingduringprostatesbrtdoesitmakeadosimetricorclinicaldifference
AT huntmargie strictbladderfillingandrectalemptyingduringprostatesbrtdoesitmakeadosimetricorclinicaldifference
AT mcbridesean strictbladderfillingandrectalemptyingduringprostatesbrtdoesitmakeadosimetricorclinicaldifference
AT kollmeiermarisaa strictbladderfillingandrectalemptyingduringprostatesbrtdoesitmakeadosimetricorclinicaldifference
AT zelefskymichaelj strictbladderfillingandrectalemptyingduringprostatesbrtdoesitmakeadosimetricorclinicaldifference