Cargando…

Risk factors and incidence of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in 8493 eyes

BACKGROUND: To report the incidence and risk factors of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: This retrospective comparative case control study included 8493 eyes of 4261 patients. Patients underwent SMILE surgery between January 2014 and September 2019 were inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Tian-Ze, Shen, Ling, Yu, Xiao-Ning, Jin, Hong-Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01680-x
_version_ 1783596070882770944
author Huang, Tian-Ze
Shen, Ling
Yu, Xiao-Ning
Jin, Hong-Ying
author_facet Huang, Tian-Ze
Shen, Ling
Yu, Xiao-Ning
Jin, Hong-Ying
author_sort Huang, Tian-Ze
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To report the incidence and risk factors of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: This retrospective comparative case control study included 8493 eyes of 4261 patients. Patients underwent SMILE surgery between January 2014 and September 2019 were included. Videos of suction loss were reviewed, and the direct causes of suction loss were noted. An independent samples t-test was used for comparisons between the suction loss group and the control group. A binary logistic regression model was used to determine the possible significant risk factors that might increase the likelihood of suction loss during SMILE surgery. RESULTS: Suction loss occurred in 31 (0.37%) eyes of 30 patients; 23 (74.2%) cases occurred in the right eye (the first operative eye) and 8 (25.8%) cases occurred in the left eye. Among the 30 patients, 23 (76.7%) were male and 7 (23.3%) were female. The incidence in the six consecutive years were 0, 2.13, 0.34, 0.24, 0.22, and 0.25%. Head and eye movements during surgery caused suction loss in 16 (51.6%) and 15 (48.4%) eyes, respectively. Comparison between the suction loss group and the control group showed that the first operative eye and male sex are at a significantly high risk for suction loss (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors of suction loss were first operative eye and male sex. Head and eye movements due to patient anxiety are the most common direct causes of suction loss. Surgeon’s experience may help to reduce the incidence of suction loss. Preoperative education and better communication during surgery needs to be emphasized. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered. ChiCTR-ORC-17011040. Registered 1 April 2017. Name of registry: The observation of clinical results after corneal refractive surgery. Data of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 1 January 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7566065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75660652020-10-20 Risk factors and incidence of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in 8493 eyes Huang, Tian-Ze Shen, Ling Yu, Xiao-Ning Jin, Hong-Ying BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To report the incidence and risk factors of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: This retrospective comparative case control study included 8493 eyes of 4261 patients. Patients underwent SMILE surgery between January 2014 and September 2019 were included. Videos of suction loss were reviewed, and the direct causes of suction loss were noted. An independent samples t-test was used for comparisons between the suction loss group and the control group. A binary logistic regression model was used to determine the possible significant risk factors that might increase the likelihood of suction loss during SMILE surgery. RESULTS: Suction loss occurred in 31 (0.37%) eyes of 30 patients; 23 (74.2%) cases occurred in the right eye (the first operative eye) and 8 (25.8%) cases occurred in the left eye. Among the 30 patients, 23 (76.7%) were male and 7 (23.3%) were female. The incidence in the six consecutive years were 0, 2.13, 0.34, 0.24, 0.22, and 0.25%. Head and eye movements during surgery caused suction loss in 16 (51.6%) and 15 (48.4%) eyes, respectively. Comparison between the suction loss group and the control group showed that the first operative eye and male sex are at a significantly high risk for suction loss (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors of suction loss were first operative eye and male sex. Head and eye movements due to patient anxiety are the most common direct causes of suction loss. Surgeon’s experience may help to reduce the incidence of suction loss. Preoperative education and better communication during surgery needs to be emphasized. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered. ChiCTR-ORC-17011040. Registered 1 April 2017. Name of registry: The observation of clinical results after corneal refractive surgery. Data of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 1 January 2014. BioMed Central 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7566065/ /pubmed/33066752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01680-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Tian-Ze
Shen, Ling
Yu, Xiao-Ning
Jin, Hong-Ying
Risk factors and incidence of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in 8493 eyes
title Risk factors and incidence of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in 8493 eyes
title_full Risk factors and incidence of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in 8493 eyes
title_fullStr Risk factors and incidence of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in 8493 eyes
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors and incidence of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in 8493 eyes
title_short Risk factors and incidence of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in 8493 eyes
title_sort risk factors and incidence of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (smile) in 8493 eyes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01680-x
work_keys_str_mv AT huangtianze riskfactorsandincidenceofsuctionlossduringsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmilein8493eyes
AT shenling riskfactorsandincidenceofsuctionlossduringsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmilein8493eyes
AT yuxiaoning riskfactorsandincidenceofsuctionlossduringsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmilein8493eyes
AT jinhongying riskfactorsandincidenceofsuctionlossduringsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmilein8493eyes