Cargando…

A comparison study between CFD analysis and PIV technique for velocity distribution over the Standard Ogee crested spillways

A comprehensive study was performed to compare flow rate, mean velocity, vertical velocity distribution, and locations where the maximum velocity, d(m), occurs on standard Ogee-crested spillways using experimental and numerical models. Five different models were constructed from rigid foam according...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karim, Rizgar Ahmed, Mohammed, Jowhar Rasheed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05165
Descripción
Sumario:A comprehensive study was performed to compare flow rate, mean velocity, vertical velocity distribution, and locations where the maximum velocity, d(m), occurs on standard Ogee-crested spillways using experimental and numerical models. Five different models were constructed from rigid foam according to the specifications of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The velocity of the flow was recorded along the downstream curve of the model for all models with different non-dimensional head ratios H/H(d) of 0.50, 1.00, and 1.33. Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) was used to measure the flow velocities. Velocity distributions were obtained by analyzing a series of captured images using Matlab codes. A commercially available Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software package, Flow-3D, was used for modelling the experimental model setups. Flow-3D analyzes the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations and is widely verified for use in the field of spillway flow analysis. The maximum difference between numerical and experimental results in mean velocity values that do not exceed 6.2% for all values of head ratios. The interpolated values of recorded maximum velocity by the PIV technique are smaller than those values numerically computed. In the lower d(m) locations, the percent difference between these regions reaches -8.65%; the upper locations are 2.87%. The vertical location (d(m)) drops to the lower location when the upstream head increases, and the distance from the spillway axis decreases linearly.