Cargando…
The Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) Trial: Lessons for Genomic Trial Design
BACKGROUND: The proportion of tumors of various histologies that may respond to drugs targeted to molecular alterations is unknown. NCI-MATCH, a collaboration between ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and the National Cancer Institute, was initiated to find efficacy signals by matching patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31922567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djz245 |
_version_ | 1783596119968710656 |
---|---|
author | Flaherty, Keith T Gray, Robert Chen, Alice Li, Shuli Patton, David Hamilton, Stanley R Williams, Paul M Mitchell, Edith P Iafrate, A John Sklar, Jeffrey Harris, Lyndsay N McShane, Lisa M Rubinstein, Larry V Sims, David J Routbort, Mark Coffey, Brent Fu, Tony Zwiebel, James A Little, Richard F Marinucci, Donna Catalano, Robert Magnan, Rick Kibbe, Warren Weil, Carol Tricoli, James V Alexander, Brian Kumar, Shaji Schwartz, Gary K Meric-Bernstam, Funda Lih, Chih-Jian McCaskill-Stevens, Worta Caimi, Paolo Takebe, Naoko Datta, Vivekananda Arteaga, Carlos L Abrams, Jeffrey S Comis, Robert O’Dwyer, Peter J Conley, Barbara A |
author_facet | Flaherty, Keith T Gray, Robert Chen, Alice Li, Shuli Patton, David Hamilton, Stanley R Williams, Paul M Mitchell, Edith P Iafrate, A John Sklar, Jeffrey Harris, Lyndsay N McShane, Lisa M Rubinstein, Larry V Sims, David J Routbort, Mark Coffey, Brent Fu, Tony Zwiebel, James A Little, Richard F Marinucci, Donna Catalano, Robert Magnan, Rick Kibbe, Warren Weil, Carol Tricoli, James V Alexander, Brian Kumar, Shaji Schwartz, Gary K Meric-Bernstam, Funda Lih, Chih-Jian McCaskill-Stevens, Worta Caimi, Paolo Takebe, Naoko Datta, Vivekananda Arteaga, Carlos L Abrams, Jeffrey S Comis, Robert O’Dwyer, Peter J Conley, Barbara A |
author_sort | Flaherty, Keith T |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The proportion of tumors of various histologies that may respond to drugs targeted to molecular alterations is unknown. NCI-MATCH, a collaboration between ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and the National Cancer Institute, was initiated to find efficacy signals by matching patients with refractory malignancies to treatment targeted to potential tumor molecular drivers regardless of cancer histology. METHODS: Trial development required assumptions about molecular target prevalence, accrual rates, treatment eligibility, and enrollment rates as well as consideration of logistical requirements. Central tumor profiling was performed with an investigational next-generation DNA–targeted sequencing assay of alterations in 143 genes, and protein expression of protein expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog, mutL homolog 1, mutS homolog 2, and RB transcriptional corepressor 1. Treatments were allocated with a validated computational platform (MATCHBOX). A preplanned interim analysis evaluated assumptions and feasibility in this novel trial. RESULTS: At interim analysis, accrual was robust, tumor biopsies were safe (<1% severe events), and profiling success was 87.3%. Actionable molecular alteration frequency met expectations, but assignment and enrollment lagged due to histology exclusions and mismatch of resources to demand. To address this lag, we revised estimates of mutation frequencies, increased screening sample size, added treatments, and improved assay throughput and efficiency (93.9% completion and 14-day turnaround). CONCLUSIONS: The experiences in the design and implementation of the NCI-MATCH trial suggest that profiling from fresh tumor biopsies and assigning treatment can be performed efficiently in a large national network trial. The success of such trials necessitates a broad screening approach and many treatment options easily accessible to patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7566320 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75663202020-10-21 The Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) Trial: Lessons for Genomic Trial Design Flaherty, Keith T Gray, Robert Chen, Alice Li, Shuli Patton, David Hamilton, Stanley R Williams, Paul M Mitchell, Edith P Iafrate, A John Sklar, Jeffrey Harris, Lyndsay N McShane, Lisa M Rubinstein, Larry V Sims, David J Routbort, Mark Coffey, Brent Fu, Tony Zwiebel, James A Little, Richard F Marinucci, Donna Catalano, Robert Magnan, Rick Kibbe, Warren Weil, Carol Tricoli, James V Alexander, Brian Kumar, Shaji Schwartz, Gary K Meric-Bernstam, Funda Lih, Chih-Jian McCaskill-Stevens, Worta Caimi, Paolo Takebe, Naoko Datta, Vivekananda Arteaga, Carlos L Abrams, Jeffrey S Comis, Robert O’Dwyer, Peter J Conley, Barbara A J Natl Cancer Inst Articles BACKGROUND: The proportion of tumors of various histologies that may respond to drugs targeted to molecular alterations is unknown. NCI-MATCH, a collaboration between ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and the National Cancer Institute, was initiated to find efficacy signals by matching patients with refractory malignancies to treatment targeted to potential tumor molecular drivers regardless of cancer histology. METHODS: Trial development required assumptions about molecular target prevalence, accrual rates, treatment eligibility, and enrollment rates as well as consideration of logistical requirements. Central tumor profiling was performed with an investigational next-generation DNA–targeted sequencing assay of alterations in 143 genes, and protein expression of protein expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog, mutL homolog 1, mutS homolog 2, and RB transcriptional corepressor 1. Treatments were allocated with a validated computational platform (MATCHBOX). A preplanned interim analysis evaluated assumptions and feasibility in this novel trial. RESULTS: At interim analysis, accrual was robust, tumor biopsies were safe (<1% severe events), and profiling success was 87.3%. Actionable molecular alteration frequency met expectations, but assignment and enrollment lagged due to histology exclusions and mismatch of resources to demand. To address this lag, we revised estimates of mutation frequencies, increased screening sample size, added treatments, and improved assay throughput and efficiency (93.9% completion and 14-day turnaround). CONCLUSIONS: The experiences in the design and implementation of the NCI-MATCH trial suggest that profiling from fresh tumor biopsies and assigning treatment can be performed efficiently in a large national network trial. The success of such trials necessitates a broad screening approach and many treatment options easily accessible to patients. Oxford University Press 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7566320/ /pubmed/31922567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djz245 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contactjournals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Articles Flaherty, Keith T Gray, Robert Chen, Alice Li, Shuli Patton, David Hamilton, Stanley R Williams, Paul M Mitchell, Edith P Iafrate, A John Sklar, Jeffrey Harris, Lyndsay N McShane, Lisa M Rubinstein, Larry V Sims, David J Routbort, Mark Coffey, Brent Fu, Tony Zwiebel, James A Little, Richard F Marinucci, Donna Catalano, Robert Magnan, Rick Kibbe, Warren Weil, Carol Tricoli, James V Alexander, Brian Kumar, Shaji Schwartz, Gary K Meric-Bernstam, Funda Lih, Chih-Jian McCaskill-Stevens, Worta Caimi, Paolo Takebe, Naoko Datta, Vivekananda Arteaga, Carlos L Abrams, Jeffrey S Comis, Robert O’Dwyer, Peter J Conley, Barbara A The Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) Trial: Lessons for Genomic Trial Design |
title | The Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) Trial: Lessons for Genomic Trial Design |
title_full | The Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) Trial: Lessons for Genomic Trial Design |
title_fullStr | The Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) Trial: Lessons for Genomic Trial Design |
title_full_unstemmed | The Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) Trial: Lessons for Genomic Trial Design |
title_short | The Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) Trial: Lessons for Genomic Trial Design |
title_sort | molecular analysis for therapy choice (nci-match) trial: lessons for genomic trial design |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31922567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djz245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flahertykeitht themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT grayrobert themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT chenalice themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT lishuli themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT pattondavid themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT hamiltonstanleyr themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT williamspaulm themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT mitchelledithp themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT iafrateajohn themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT sklarjeffrey themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT harrislyndsayn themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT mcshanelisam themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT rubinsteinlarryv themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT simsdavidj themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT routbortmark themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT coffeybrent themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT futony themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT zwiebeljamesa themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT littlerichardf themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT marinuccidonna themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT catalanorobert themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT magnanrick themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT kibbewarren themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT weilcarol themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT tricolijamesv themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT alexanderbrian themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT kumarshaji themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT schwartzgaryk themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT mericbernstamfunda themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT lihchihjian themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT mccaskillstevensworta themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT caimipaolo themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT takebenaoko themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT dattavivekananda themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT arteagacarlosl themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT abramsjeffreys themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT comisrobert themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT odwyerpeterj themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT conleybarbaraa themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT themolecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT flahertykeitht molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT grayrobert molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT chenalice molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT lishuli molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT pattondavid molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT hamiltonstanleyr molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT williamspaulm molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT mitchelledithp molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT iafrateajohn molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT sklarjeffrey molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT harrislyndsayn molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT mcshanelisam molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT rubinsteinlarryv molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT simsdavidj molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT routbortmark molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT coffeybrent molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT futony molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT zwiebeljamesa molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT littlerichardf molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT marinuccidonna molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT catalanorobert molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT magnanrick molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT kibbewarren molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT weilcarol molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT tricolijamesv molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT alexanderbrian molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT kumarshaji molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT schwartzgaryk molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT mericbernstamfunda molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT lihchihjian molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT mccaskillstevensworta molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT caimipaolo molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT takebenaoko molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT dattavivekananda molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT arteagacarlosl molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT abramsjeffreys molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT comisrobert molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT odwyerpeterj molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT conleybarbaraa molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign AT molecularanalysisfortherapychoicencimatchtriallessonsforgenomictrialdesign |