Cargando…

Lifetime Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Risk-Stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND: Studies conducted in Swedish populations have shown that men with lowest prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at ages 44–50 years and 60 years have very low risk of future distant metastasis or death from prostate cancer. This study investigates benefits and harms of screening strategi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heijnsdijk, Eveline A M, Gulati, Roman, Tsodikov, Alex, Lange, Jane M, Mariotto, Angela B, Vickers, Andrew J, Carlsson, Sigrid V, Etzioni, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32067047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa001
_version_ 1783596121611829248
author Heijnsdijk, Eveline A M
Gulati, Roman
Tsodikov, Alex
Lange, Jane M
Mariotto, Angela B
Vickers, Andrew J
Carlsson, Sigrid V
Etzioni, Ruth
author_facet Heijnsdijk, Eveline A M
Gulati, Roman
Tsodikov, Alex
Lange, Jane M
Mariotto, Angela B
Vickers, Andrew J
Carlsson, Sigrid V
Etzioni, Ruth
author_sort Heijnsdijk, Eveline A M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies conducted in Swedish populations have shown that men with lowest prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at ages 44–50 years and 60 years have very low risk of future distant metastasis or death from prostate cancer. This study investigates benefits and harms of screening strategies stratified by PSA levels. METHODS: PSA levels and diagnosis patterns from two microsimulation models of prostate cancer progression, detection, and mortality were compared against results of the Malmö Preventive Project, which stored serum and tracked subsequent prostate cancer diagnoses for 25 years. The models predicted the harms (tests and overdiagnoses) and benefits (lives saved and life-years gained) of PSA-stratified screening strategies compared with biennial screening from age 45 years to age 69 years. RESULTS: Compared with biennial screening for ages 45–69 years, lengthening screening intervals for men with PSA less than 1.0 ng/mL at age 45 years led to 46.8–47.0% fewer tests (range between models), 0.9–2.1% fewer overdiagnoses, and 3.1–3.8% fewer lives saved. Stopping screening when PSA was less than 1.0 ng/mL at age 60 years and older led to 12.8–16.0% fewer tests, 5.0–24.0% fewer overdiagnoses, and 5.0–13.1% fewer lives saved. Differences in model results can be partially explained by differences in assumptions about the link between PSA growth and the risk of disease progression. CONCLUSION: Relative to a biennial screening strategy, PSA-stratified screening strategies investigated in this study substantially reduced the testing burden and modestly reduced overdiagnosis while preserving most lives saved. Further research is needed to clarify the link between PSA growth and disease progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7566340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75663402020-10-21 Lifetime Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Risk-Stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer Heijnsdijk, Eveline A M Gulati, Roman Tsodikov, Alex Lange, Jane M Mariotto, Angela B Vickers, Andrew J Carlsson, Sigrid V Etzioni, Ruth J Natl Cancer Inst Articles BACKGROUND: Studies conducted in Swedish populations have shown that men with lowest prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at ages 44–50 years and 60 years have very low risk of future distant metastasis or death from prostate cancer. This study investigates benefits and harms of screening strategies stratified by PSA levels. METHODS: PSA levels and diagnosis patterns from two microsimulation models of prostate cancer progression, detection, and mortality were compared against results of the Malmö Preventive Project, which stored serum and tracked subsequent prostate cancer diagnoses for 25 years. The models predicted the harms (tests and overdiagnoses) and benefits (lives saved and life-years gained) of PSA-stratified screening strategies compared with biennial screening from age 45 years to age 69 years. RESULTS: Compared with biennial screening for ages 45–69 years, lengthening screening intervals for men with PSA less than 1.0 ng/mL at age 45 years led to 46.8–47.0% fewer tests (range between models), 0.9–2.1% fewer overdiagnoses, and 3.1–3.8% fewer lives saved. Stopping screening when PSA was less than 1.0 ng/mL at age 60 years and older led to 12.8–16.0% fewer tests, 5.0–24.0% fewer overdiagnoses, and 5.0–13.1% fewer lives saved. Differences in model results can be partially explained by differences in assumptions about the link between PSA growth and the risk of disease progression. CONCLUSION: Relative to a biennial screening strategy, PSA-stratified screening strategies investigated in this study substantially reduced the testing burden and modestly reduced overdiagnosis while preserving most lives saved. Further research is needed to clarify the link between PSA growth and disease progression. Oxford University Press 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7566340/ /pubmed/32067047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa001 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Articles
Heijnsdijk, Eveline A M
Gulati, Roman
Tsodikov, Alex
Lange, Jane M
Mariotto, Angela B
Vickers, Andrew J
Carlsson, Sigrid V
Etzioni, Ruth
Lifetime Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Risk-Stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer
title Lifetime Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Risk-Stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer
title_full Lifetime Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Risk-Stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Lifetime Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Risk-Stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Lifetime Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Risk-Stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer
title_short Lifetime Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Risk-Stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer
title_sort lifetime benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen–based risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32067047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa001
work_keys_str_mv AT heijnsdijkevelineam lifetimebenefitsandharmsofprostatespecificantigenbasedriskstratifiedscreeningforprostatecancer
AT gulatiroman lifetimebenefitsandharmsofprostatespecificantigenbasedriskstratifiedscreeningforprostatecancer
AT tsodikovalex lifetimebenefitsandharmsofprostatespecificantigenbasedriskstratifiedscreeningforprostatecancer
AT langejanem lifetimebenefitsandharmsofprostatespecificantigenbasedriskstratifiedscreeningforprostatecancer
AT mariottoangelab lifetimebenefitsandharmsofprostatespecificantigenbasedriskstratifiedscreeningforprostatecancer
AT vickersandrewj lifetimebenefitsandharmsofprostatespecificantigenbasedriskstratifiedscreeningforprostatecancer
AT carlssonsigridv lifetimebenefitsandharmsofprostatespecificantigenbasedriskstratifiedscreeningforprostatecancer
AT etzioniruth lifetimebenefitsandharmsofprostatespecificantigenbasedriskstratifiedscreeningforprostatecancer