Cargando…
EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories
OBJECTIVES: When bloodstream infections are caused by resistant bacteria, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for adjustment of therapy. The EUCAST RAST method, directly from positive blood cultures, was validated in a multi-laboratory study in Europe. METHODS: RAST was pe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32789506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa333 |
_version_ | 1783596122557644800 |
---|---|
author | Åkerlund, Anna Jonasson, Emma Matuschek, Erika Serrander, Lena Sundqvist, Martin Kahlmeter, Gunnar |
author_facet | Åkerlund, Anna Jonasson, Emma Matuschek, Erika Serrander, Lena Sundqvist, Martin Kahlmeter, Gunnar |
author_sort | Åkerlund, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: When bloodstream infections are caused by resistant bacteria, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for adjustment of therapy. The EUCAST RAST method, directly from positive blood cultures, was validated in a multi-laboratory study in Europe. METHODS: RAST was performed in 40 laboratories in northern Europe (NE) and 15 in southern Europe (SE) from clinical blood cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae. Categorical results at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were compared with results for EUCAST standard 16–20 h disc diffusion. The method, preliminary breakpoints and the performance of the laboratories were evaluated. RESULTS: The total number of isolates was 833/318 in NE/SE. The number of zone diameters that could be read (88%, 96% and 99%) and interpreted (70%, 81% and 85%) increased with incubation time (4, 6 and 8 h). The categorical agreement was acceptable, with total error rates in NE/SE of 2.4%/4.9% at 4 h, 1.1%/3.5% at 6 h and 1.1%/3.3% at 8 h. False susceptibility at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation was below 0.3% and 1.1% in NE and SE, respectively, and the corresponding percentages for false resistance were below 1.9% and 2.8%. After fine-tuning breakpoints, more zones could be interpreted (73%, 89% and 93%), with only marginally affected error rates. CONCLUSIONS: The EUCAST RAST method can be implemented in routine laboratories without major investments. It provides reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for relevant bloodstream infection pathogens after 4–6 h of incubation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7566356 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75663562020-10-21 EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories Åkerlund, Anna Jonasson, Emma Matuschek, Erika Serrander, Lena Sundqvist, Martin Kahlmeter, Gunnar J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research OBJECTIVES: When bloodstream infections are caused by resistant bacteria, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for adjustment of therapy. The EUCAST RAST method, directly from positive blood cultures, was validated in a multi-laboratory study in Europe. METHODS: RAST was performed in 40 laboratories in northern Europe (NE) and 15 in southern Europe (SE) from clinical blood cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae. Categorical results at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were compared with results for EUCAST standard 16–20 h disc diffusion. The method, preliminary breakpoints and the performance of the laboratories were evaluated. RESULTS: The total number of isolates was 833/318 in NE/SE. The number of zone diameters that could be read (88%, 96% and 99%) and interpreted (70%, 81% and 85%) increased with incubation time (4, 6 and 8 h). The categorical agreement was acceptable, with total error rates in NE/SE of 2.4%/4.9% at 4 h, 1.1%/3.5% at 6 h and 1.1%/3.3% at 8 h. False susceptibility at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation was below 0.3% and 1.1% in NE and SE, respectively, and the corresponding percentages for false resistance were below 1.9% and 2.8%. After fine-tuning breakpoints, more zones could be interpreted (73%, 89% and 93%), with only marginally affected error rates. CONCLUSIONS: The EUCAST RAST method can be implemented in routine laboratories without major investments. It provides reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for relevant bloodstream infection pathogens after 4–6 h of incubation. Oxford University Press 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7566356/ /pubmed/32789506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa333 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Research Åkerlund, Anna Jonasson, Emma Matuschek, Erika Serrander, Lena Sundqvist, Martin Kahlmeter, Gunnar EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories |
title | EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories |
title_full | EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories |
title_fullStr | EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories |
title_full_unstemmed | EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories |
title_short | EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories |
title_sort | eucast rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (rast) in blood cultures: validation in 55 european laboratories |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32789506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa333 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akerlundanna eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories AT jonassonemma eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories AT matuschekerika eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories AT serranderlena eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories AT sundqvistmartin eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories AT kahlmetergunnar eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories AT eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories |