Cargando…

EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories

OBJECTIVES: When bloodstream infections are caused by resistant bacteria, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for adjustment of therapy. The EUCAST RAST method, directly from positive blood cultures, was validated in a multi-laboratory study in Europe. METHODS: RAST was pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Åkerlund, Anna, Jonasson, Emma, Matuschek, Erika, Serrander, Lena, Sundqvist, Martin, Kahlmeter, Gunnar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32789506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa333
_version_ 1783596122557644800
author Åkerlund, Anna
Jonasson, Emma
Matuschek, Erika
Serrander, Lena
Sundqvist, Martin
Kahlmeter, Gunnar
author_facet Åkerlund, Anna
Jonasson, Emma
Matuschek, Erika
Serrander, Lena
Sundqvist, Martin
Kahlmeter, Gunnar
author_sort Åkerlund, Anna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: When bloodstream infections are caused by resistant bacteria, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for adjustment of therapy. The EUCAST RAST method, directly from positive blood cultures, was validated in a multi-laboratory study in Europe. METHODS: RAST was performed in 40 laboratories in northern Europe (NE) and 15 in southern Europe (SE) from clinical blood cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae. Categorical results at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were compared with results for EUCAST standard 16–20 h disc diffusion. The method, preliminary breakpoints and the performance of the laboratories were evaluated. RESULTS: The total number of isolates was 833/318 in NE/SE. The number of zone diameters that could be read (88%, 96% and 99%) and interpreted (70%, 81% and 85%) increased with incubation time (4, 6 and 8 h). The categorical agreement was acceptable, with total error rates in NE/SE of 2.4%/4.9% at 4 h, 1.1%/3.5% at 6 h and 1.1%/3.3% at 8 h. False susceptibility at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation was below 0.3% and 1.1% in NE and SE, respectively, and the corresponding percentages for false resistance were below 1.9% and 2.8%. After fine-tuning breakpoints, more zones could be interpreted (73%, 89% and 93%), with only marginally affected error rates. CONCLUSIONS: The EUCAST RAST method can be implemented in routine laboratories without major investments. It provides reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for relevant bloodstream infection pathogens after 4–6 h of incubation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7566356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75663562020-10-21 EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories Åkerlund, Anna Jonasson, Emma Matuschek, Erika Serrander, Lena Sundqvist, Martin Kahlmeter, Gunnar J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research OBJECTIVES: When bloodstream infections are caused by resistant bacteria, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for adjustment of therapy. The EUCAST RAST method, directly from positive blood cultures, was validated in a multi-laboratory study in Europe. METHODS: RAST was performed in 40 laboratories in northern Europe (NE) and 15 in southern Europe (SE) from clinical blood cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae. Categorical results at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were compared with results for EUCAST standard 16–20 h disc diffusion. The method, preliminary breakpoints and the performance of the laboratories were evaluated. RESULTS: The total number of isolates was 833/318 in NE/SE. The number of zone diameters that could be read (88%, 96% and 99%) and interpreted (70%, 81% and 85%) increased with incubation time (4, 6 and 8 h). The categorical agreement was acceptable, with total error rates in NE/SE of 2.4%/4.9% at 4 h, 1.1%/3.5% at 6 h and 1.1%/3.3% at 8 h. False susceptibility at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation was below 0.3% and 1.1% in NE and SE, respectively, and the corresponding percentages for false resistance were below 1.9% and 2.8%. After fine-tuning breakpoints, more zones could be interpreted (73%, 89% and 93%), with only marginally affected error rates. CONCLUSIONS: The EUCAST RAST method can be implemented in routine laboratories without major investments. It provides reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for relevant bloodstream infection pathogens after 4–6 h of incubation. Oxford University Press 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7566356/ /pubmed/32789506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa333 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research
Åkerlund, Anna
Jonasson, Emma
Matuschek, Erika
Serrander, Lena
Sundqvist, Martin
Kahlmeter, Gunnar
EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories
title EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories
title_full EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories
title_fullStr EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories
title_full_unstemmed EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories
title_short EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories
title_sort eucast rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (rast) in blood cultures: validation in 55 european laboratories
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32789506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa333
work_keys_str_mv AT akerlundanna eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories
AT jonassonemma eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories
AT matuschekerika eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories
AT serranderlena eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories
AT sundqvistmartin eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories
AT kahlmetergunnar eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories
AT eucastrapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingrastinbloodculturesvalidationin55europeanlaboratories