Cargando…

Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leakage is the most important complication in colorectal surgery occurring in up to 20% after low anterior rectal resection. Therefore, a diverting ileostomy is usually created during low anterior resection to protect the anastomosis or rather to diminish the consequences i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hüttner, Felix J, Probst, Pascal, Mihaljevic, André, Contin, Pietro, Dörr-Harim, Colette, Ulrich, Alexis, Schneider, Martin, Büchler, Markus W, Diener, Markus K, Knebel, Phillip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33060088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038930
_version_ 1783596184593498112
author Hüttner, Felix J
Probst, Pascal
Mihaljevic, André
Contin, Pietro
Dörr-Harim, Colette
Ulrich, Alexis
Schneider, Martin
Büchler, Markus W
Diener, Markus K
Knebel, Phillip
author_facet Hüttner, Felix J
Probst, Pascal
Mihaljevic, André
Contin, Pietro
Dörr-Harim, Colette
Ulrich, Alexis
Schneider, Martin
Büchler, Markus W
Diener, Markus K
Knebel, Phillip
author_sort Hüttner, Felix J
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leakage is the most important complication in colorectal surgery occurring in up to 20% after low anterior rectal resection. Therefore, a diverting ileostomy is usually created during low anterior resection to protect the anastomosis or rather to diminish the consequences in case of anastomotic leakage. The so-called virtual or ghost ileostomy is a pre-stage ostomy that can be easily exteriorised, if anastomotic leakage is suspected, in order to avoid the severe consequences of anastomotic leakage. On the other hand, an actual ileostomy can be avoided in patients, who do not develop anastomotic leakage. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The GHOST trial is a randomised controlled pilot trial comparing ghost ileostomy with conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. After screening for eligibility and obtaining informed consent, a total of 60 adult patients are included in the trial. Patients are intraoperatively randomised to the trial groups in a 1:1 ratio after assuring that none of the intraoperative exclusion criteria are present. The main outcome parameter is the comprehensive complication index as a measure of safety. Further outcomes include specific complications, stoma-related complications, complications of ileostomy closure, frequency of transformation of ghost ileostomy into conventional ileostomy, frequency of terminal ostomy creation, proportion of patients with an ostomy at 6 months after index surgery, anorectal function (Wexner score) and quality of life assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and CR29 questionnaires. Follow-up for each individual patient will be 6 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The GHOST trial has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Heidelberg University (reference number S-694/2017). If the intervention proves to be safe, loop ileostomy could be spared in a large proportion of patients, thus also avoiding stoma-related complications and a second operation (ileostomy closure) with its inherent complications in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00013997); Universal Trial Number: U1111-1208-9742.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7566726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75667262020-10-19 Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial Hüttner, Felix J Probst, Pascal Mihaljevic, André Contin, Pietro Dörr-Harim, Colette Ulrich, Alexis Schneider, Martin Büchler, Markus W Diener, Markus K Knebel, Phillip BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leakage is the most important complication in colorectal surgery occurring in up to 20% after low anterior rectal resection. Therefore, a diverting ileostomy is usually created during low anterior resection to protect the anastomosis or rather to diminish the consequences in case of anastomotic leakage. The so-called virtual or ghost ileostomy is a pre-stage ostomy that can be easily exteriorised, if anastomotic leakage is suspected, in order to avoid the severe consequences of anastomotic leakage. On the other hand, an actual ileostomy can be avoided in patients, who do not develop anastomotic leakage. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The GHOST trial is a randomised controlled pilot trial comparing ghost ileostomy with conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. After screening for eligibility and obtaining informed consent, a total of 60 adult patients are included in the trial. Patients are intraoperatively randomised to the trial groups in a 1:1 ratio after assuring that none of the intraoperative exclusion criteria are present. The main outcome parameter is the comprehensive complication index as a measure of safety. Further outcomes include specific complications, stoma-related complications, complications of ileostomy closure, frequency of transformation of ghost ileostomy into conventional ileostomy, frequency of terminal ostomy creation, proportion of patients with an ostomy at 6 months after index surgery, anorectal function (Wexner score) and quality of life assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and CR29 questionnaires. Follow-up for each individual patient will be 6 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The GHOST trial has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Heidelberg University (reference number S-694/2017). If the intervention proves to be safe, loop ileostomy could be spared in a large proportion of patients, thus also avoiding stoma-related complications and a second operation (ileostomy closure) with its inherent complications in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00013997); Universal Trial Number: U1111-1208-9742. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7566726/ /pubmed/33060088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038930 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Hüttner, Felix J
Probst, Pascal
Mihaljevic, André
Contin, Pietro
Dörr-Harim, Colette
Ulrich, Alexis
Schneider, Martin
Büchler, Markus W
Diener, Markus K
Knebel, Phillip
Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (drks00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33060088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038930
work_keys_str_mv AT huttnerfelixj ghostileostomyversusconventionalloopileostomyinpatientsundergoinglowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerdrks00013997protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT probstpascal ghostileostomyversusconventionalloopileostomyinpatientsundergoinglowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerdrks00013997protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mihaljevicandre ghostileostomyversusconventionalloopileostomyinpatientsundergoinglowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerdrks00013997protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT continpietro ghostileostomyversusconventionalloopileostomyinpatientsundergoinglowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerdrks00013997protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dorrharimcolette ghostileostomyversusconventionalloopileostomyinpatientsundergoinglowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerdrks00013997protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ulrichalexis ghostileostomyversusconventionalloopileostomyinpatientsundergoinglowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerdrks00013997protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schneidermartin ghostileostomyversusconventionalloopileostomyinpatientsundergoinglowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerdrks00013997protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT buchlermarkusw ghostileostomyversusconventionalloopileostomyinpatientsundergoinglowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerdrks00013997protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dienermarkusk ghostileostomyversusconventionalloopileostomyinpatientsundergoinglowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerdrks00013997protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT knebelphillip ghostileostomyversusconventionalloopileostomyinpatientsundergoinglowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerdrks00013997protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial