Cargando…
Association between mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index in pregnant women to assess their nutritional status
BACKGROUND: Underweight/ Undernourished is a state when the body mass index (BMI) falls below 18.5 kg/m2 and as per National Family and Health Survey-4, 22.9% of women in the reproductive age group fall into this category. Despite being considered as an important anthropometry marker, it is not meas...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7567285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33102290 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_57_20 |
_version_ | 1783596295684882432 |
---|---|
author | Mishra, Kumar Guru Bhatia, Vikas Nayak, Ranjeeta |
author_facet | Mishra, Kumar Guru Bhatia, Vikas Nayak, Ranjeeta |
author_sort | Mishra, Kumar Guru |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Underweight/ Undernourished is a state when the body mass index (BMI) falls below 18.5 kg/m2 and as per National Family and Health Survey-4, 22.9% of women in the reproductive age group fall into this category. Despite being considered as an important anthropometry marker, it is not measured in most of the healthcare facilities across India due to lack of basic amenities and resources. In such instances, how helpful other indicators like mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) can be to measure the undernourished status of pregnant needs to be determined. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of undernutrition in pregnant women (PW) based on baseline BMI and MUAC and to determine the association between them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Tangi Block of Odisha among 440 PW (in the first trimester) from July 2018 to November 2018 using a pre-tested, validated questionnaire and anthropometric instruments. RESULTS: PW having BMI <18.5 kg/m2 were found to be 16.6% and having MUAC <23.5 cm were 19.5%. A significant association was found between BMI and MUAC [aOR 7.91 (4.27–14.65)]. Also, a moderate correlation was established between the indicators (r = 0.57). CONCLUSION: MUAC can be used instead of BMI as it is easier to measure, cheaper, does not require any training or calculations, and insensitive to changes during the period of gestation unlike BMI. This can be beneficial to the healthcare workers at primary level who are in resource-limited settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7567285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75672852020-10-22 Association between mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index in pregnant women to assess their nutritional status Mishra, Kumar Guru Bhatia, Vikas Nayak, Ranjeeta J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Underweight/ Undernourished is a state when the body mass index (BMI) falls below 18.5 kg/m2 and as per National Family and Health Survey-4, 22.9% of women in the reproductive age group fall into this category. Despite being considered as an important anthropometry marker, it is not measured in most of the healthcare facilities across India due to lack of basic amenities and resources. In such instances, how helpful other indicators like mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) can be to measure the undernourished status of pregnant needs to be determined. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of undernutrition in pregnant women (PW) based on baseline BMI and MUAC and to determine the association between them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Tangi Block of Odisha among 440 PW (in the first trimester) from July 2018 to November 2018 using a pre-tested, validated questionnaire and anthropometric instruments. RESULTS: PW having BMI <18.5 kg/m2 were found to be 16.6% and having MUAC <23.5 cm were 19.5%. A significant association was found between BMI and MUAC [aOR 7.91 (4.27–14.65)]. Also, a moderate correlation was established between the indicators (r = 0.57). CONCLUSION: MUAC can be used instead of BMI as it is easier to measure, cheaper, does not require any training or calculations, and insensitive to changes during the period of gestation unlike BMI. This can be beneficial to the healthcare workers at primary level who are in resource-limited settings. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7567285/ /pubmed/33102290 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_57_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mishra, Kumar Guru Bhatia, Vikas Nayak, Ranjeeta Association between mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index in pregnant women to assess their nutritional status |
title | Association between mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index in pregnant women to assess their nutritional status |
title_full | Association between mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index in pregnant women to assess their nutritional status |
title_fullStr | Association between mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index in pregnant women to assess their nutritional status |
title_full_unstemmed | Association between mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index in pregnant women to assess their nutritional status |
title_short | Association between mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index in pregnant women to assess their nutritional status |
title_sort | association between mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index in pregnant women to assess their nutritional status |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7567285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33102290 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_57_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mishrakumarguru associationbetweenmidupperarmcircumferenceandbodymassindexinpregnantwomentoassesstheirnutritionalstatus AT bhatiavikas associationbetweenmidupperarmcircumferenceandbodymassindexinpregnantwomentoassesstheirnutritionalstatus AT nayakranjeeta associationbetweenmidupperarmcircumferenceandbodymassindexinpregnantwomentoassesstheirnutritionalstatus |