Cargando…

Weekly dengue forecasts in Iquitos, Peru; San Juan, Puerto Rico; and Singapore

BACKGROUND: Predictive models can serve as early warning systems and can be used to forecast future risk of various infectious diseases. Conventionally, regression and time series models are used to forecast dengue incidence, using dengue surveillance (e.g., case counts) and weather data. However, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benedum, Corey M., Shea, Kimberly M., Jenkins, Helen E., Kim, Louis Y., Markuzon, Natasha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7567393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33064770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008710
_version_ 1783596318079320064
author Benedum, Corey M.
Shea, Kimberly M.
Jenkins, Helen E.
Kim, Louis Y.
Markuzon, Natasha
author_facet Benedum, Corey M.
Shea, Kimberly M.
Jenkins, Helen E.
Kim, Louis Y.
Markuzon, Natasha
author_sort Benedum, Corey M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Predictive models can serve as early warning systems and can be used to forecast future risk of various infectious diseases. Conventionally, regression and time series models are used to forecast dengue incidence, using dengue surveillance (e.g., case counts) and weather data. However, these models may be limited in terms of model assumptions and the number of predictors that can be included. Machine learning (ML) methods are designed to work with a large number of predictors and thus offer an appealing alternative. Here, we compared the performance of ML algorithms with that of regression models in predicting dengue cases and outbreaks from 4 to up to 12 weeks in advance. Many countries lack sufficient health surveillance infrastructure, as such we evaluated the contribution of dengue surveillance and weather data on the predictive power of these models. METHODS: We developed ML, regression, and time series models to forecast weekly dengue case counts and outbreaks in Iquitos, Peru; San Juan, Puerto Rico; and Singapore from 1990–2016. Forecasts were generated using available weekly dengue surveillance, and weather data. We evaluated the agreement between model forecasts and actual dengue observations using Mean Absolute Error and Matthew’s Correlation Coefficient (MCC). RESULTS: For near term predictions of weekly case counts and when using surveillance data, ML models had 21% and 33% less error than regression and time series models respectively. However, using weather data only, ML models did not demonstrate a practical advantage. When forecasting weekly dengue outbreaks 12 weeks in advance, ML models achieved a maximum MCC of 0.61. CONCLUSIONS: Our results identified 2 scenarios when ML models are advantageous over regression model: 1) predicting dengue weekly case counts 4 weeks ahead when dengue surveillance data are available and 2) predicting weekly dengue outbreaks 12 weeks ahead when dengue surveillance data are unavailable. Given the advantages of ML models, dengue early warning systems may be improved by the inclusion of these models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7567393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75673932020-10-21 Weekly dengue forecasts in Iquitos, Peru; San Juan, Puerto Rico; and Singapore Benedum, Corey M. Shea, Kimberly M. Jenkins, Helen E. Kim, Louis Y. Markuzon, Natasha PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Predictive models can serve as early warning systems and can be used to forecast future risk of various infectious diseases. Conventionally, regression and time series models are used to forecast dengue incidence, using dengue surveillance (e.g., case counts) and weather data. However, these models may be limited in terms of model assumptions and the number of predictors that can be included. Machine learning (ML) methods are designed to work with a large number of predictors and thus offer an appealing alternative. Here, we compared the performance of ML algorithms with that of regression models in predicting dengue cases and outbreaks from 4 to up to 12 weeks in advance. Many countries lack sufficient health surveillance infrastructure, as such we evaluated the contribution of dengue surveillance and weather data on the predictive power of these models. METHODS: We developed ML, regression, and time series models to forecast weekly dengue case counts and outbreaks in Iquitos, Peru; San Juan, Puerto Rico; and Singapore from 1990–2016. Forecasts were generated using available weekly dengue surveillance, and weather data. We evaluated the agreement between model forecasts and actual dengue observations using Mean Absolute Error and Matthew’s Correlation Coefficient (MCC). RESULTS: For near term predictions of weekly case counts and when using surveillance data, ML models had 21% and 33% less error than regression and time series models respectively. However, using weather data only, ML models did not demonstrate a practical advantage. When forecasting weekly dengue outbreaks 12 weeks in advance, ML models achieved a maximum MCC of 0.61. CONCLUSIONS: Our results identified 2 scenarios when ML models are advantageous over regression model: 1) predicting dengue weekly case counts 4 weeks ahead when dengue surveillance data are available and 2) predicting weekly dengue outbreaks 12 weeks ahead when dengue surveillance data are unavailable. Given the advantages of ML models, dengue early warning systems may be improved by the inclusion of these models. Public Library of Science 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7567393/ /pubmed/33064770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008710 Text en © 2020 Benedum et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Benedum, Corey M.
Shea, Kimberly M.
Jenkins, Helen E.
Kim, Louis Y.
Markuzon, Natasha
Weekly dengue forecasts in Iquitos, Peru; San Juan, Puerto Rico; and Singapore
title Weekly dengue forecasts in Iquitos, Peru; San Juan, Puerto Rico; and Singapore
title_full Weekly dengue forecasts in Iquitos, Peru; San Juan, Puerto Rico; and Singapore
title_fullStr Weekly dengue forecasts in Iquitos, Peru; San Juan, Puerto Rico; and Singapore
title_full_unstemmed Weekly dengue forecasts in Iquitos, Peru; San Juan, Puerto Rico; and Singapore
title_short Weekly dengue forecasts in Iquitos, Peru; San Juan, Puerto Rico; and Singapore
title_sort weekly dengue forecasts in iquitos, peru; san juan, puerto rico; and singapore
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7567393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33064770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008710
work_keys_str_mv AT benedumcoreym weeklydengueforecastsiniquitosperusanjuanpuertoricoandsingapore
AT sheakimberlym weeklydengueforecastsiniquitosperusanjuanpuertoricoandsingapore
AT jenkinshelene weeklydengueforecastsiniquitosperusanjuanpuertoricoandsingapore
AT kimlouisy weeklydengueforecastsiniquitosperusanjuanpuertoricoandsingapore
AT markuzonnatasha weeklydengueforecastsiniquitosperusanjuanpuertoricoandsingapore