Cargando…
Establishment and validation of a model for brain injury state evaluation and prognosis prediction
PURPOSE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of disability and death in modern times, whose evaluation and prognosis prediction have been one of the most critical issues in TBI management. However, the existed models for the abovementioned purposes were defective to varying deg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7567905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32928607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.08.006 |
_version_ | 1783596422932725760 |
---|---|
author | Li, Xia Lü, Chao Wang, Jun Wan, Yi Dai, Shu-Hui Zhang, Lei Hu, Xue-An Jiang, Xiao-Fan Fei, Zhou |
author_facet | Li, Xia Lü, Chao Wang, Jun Wan, Yi Dai, Shu-Hui Zhang, Lei Hu, Xue-An Jiang, Xiao-Fan Fei, Zhou |
author_sort | Li, Xia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of disability and death in modern times, whose evaluation and prognosis prediction have been one of the most critical issues in TBI management. However, the existed models for the abovementioned purposes were defective to varying degrees. This study aims to establish an ideal brain injury state clinical prediction model (BISCPM). METHODS: This study was a retrospective design. The six-month outcomes of patients were selected as the end point event. BISCPM was established by using the split-sample technology, and externally validated via different tests of comparison between the observed and predicted six-month mortality in validating group. TBI patients admitted from July 2006 to June 2012 were recruited and randomly divided into establishing model group and validating model group. Twenty-one scoring indicators were included in BISCPM and divided into three parts, A, B, and C. Part A included movement, pupillary reflex and diameter, CT parameters, and secondary brain insult factors, etc. Part B was age and part C was medical history of the patients. The total score of part A, B and C was final score of BISCPM. RESULTS: Altogether 1156 TBI patients were included with 578 cases in each group. The score of BISCPM from validating group ranged from 2.75 to 31.94, averaging 13.64 ± 5.59. There was not statistical difference between observed and predicted mortality for validating group. The discrimination validation showed that the BISCPM is superior to international mission for prognosis and analysis of clinical trials (IMPACT) lab model. CONCLUSION: BISCPM is an effective model for state evaluation and prognosis prediction of TBI patients. The use of BISCPM could be of great significance for decision-making in management of TBI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7567905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75679052020-10-20 Establishment and validation of a model for brain injury state evaluation and prognosis prediction Li, Xia Lü, Chao Wang, Jun Wan, Yi Dai, Shu-Hui Zhang, Lei Hu, Xue-An Jiang, Xiao-Fan Fei, Zhou Chin J Traumatol Original Article PURPOSE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of disability and death in modern times, whose evaluation and prognosis prediction have been one of the most critical issues in TBI management. However, the existed models for the abovementioned purposes were defective to varying degrees. This study aims to establish an ideal brain injury state clinical prediction model (BISCPM). METHODS: This study was a retrospective design. The six-month outcomes of patients were selected as the end point event. BISCPM was established by using the split-sample technology, and externally validated via different tests of comparison between the observed and predicted six-month mortality in validating group. TBI patients admitted from July 2006 to June 2012 were recruited and randomly divided into establishing model group and validating model group. Twenty-one scoring indicators were included in BISCPM and divided into three parts, A, B, and C. Part A included movement, pupillary reflex and diameter, CT parameters, and secondary brain insult factors, etc. Part B was age and part C was medical history of the patients. The total score of part A, B and C was final score of BISCPM. RESULTS: Altogether 1156 TBI patients were included with 578 cases in each group. The score of BISCPM from validating group ranged from 2.75 to 31.94, averaging 13.64 ± 5.59. There was not statistical difference between observed and predicted mortality for validating group. The discrimination validation showed that the BISCPM is superior to international mission for prognosis and analysis of clinical trials (IMPACT) lab model. CONCLUSION: BISCPM is an effective model for state evaluation and prognosis prediction of TBI patients. The use of BISCPM could be of great significance for decision-making in management of TBI. Elsevier 2020-10 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7567905/ /pubmed/32928607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.08.006 Text en © 2020 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Medical Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Li, Xia Lü, Chao Wang, Jun Wan, Yi Dai, Shu-Hui Zhang, Lei Hu, Xue-An Jiang, Xiao-Fan Fei, Zhou Establishment and validation of a model for brain injury state evaluation and prognosis prediction |
title | Establishment and validation of a model for brain injury state evaluation and prognosis prediction |
title_full | Establishment and validation of a model for brain injury state evaluation and prognosis prediction |
title_fullStr | Establishment and validation of a model for brain injury state evaluation and prognosis prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | Establishment and validation of a model for brain injury state evaluation and prognosis prediction |
title_short | Establishment and validation of a model for brain injury state evaluation and prognosis prediction |
title_sort | establishment and validation of a model for brain injury state evaluation and prognosis prediction |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7567905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32928607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.08.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lixia establishmentandvalidationofamodelforbraininjurystateevaluationandprognosisprediction AT luchao establishmentandvalidationofamodelforbraininjurystateevaluationandprognosisprediction AT wangjun establishmentandvalidationofamodelforbraininjurystateevaluationandprognosisprediction AT wanyi establishmentandvalidationofamodelforbraininjurystateevaluationandprognosisprediction AT daishuhui establishmentandvalidationofamodelforbraininjurystateevaluationandprognosisprediction AT zhanglei establishmentandvalidationofamodelforbraininjurystateevaluationandprognosisprediction AT huxuean establishmentandvalidationofamodelforbraininjurystateevaluationandprognosisprediction AT jiangxiaofan establishmentandvalidationofamodelforbraininjurystateevaluationandprognosisprediction AT feizhou establishmentandvalidationofamodelforbraininjurystateevaluationandprognosisprediction |