Cargando…

Microfluidic testing of flocculants for produced water treatment: Comparison with other methodologies

Flocculants are often added during produced water treatment to improve the crude oil droplet growth and separation from the water phase. Prior to use in the field, their performance is tested in laboratory conditions, typically with jar tests that require quite large volumes of sample. In this paper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dudek, Marcin, Ullaland, Hanne Skudal, Wehrle, Amandine, Øye, Gisle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7567950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100073
_version_ 1783596431482814464
author Dudek, Marcin
Ullaland, Hanne Skudal
Wehrle, Amandine
Øye, Gisle
author_facet Dudek, Marcin
Ullaland, Hanne Skudal
Wehrle, Amandine
Øye, Gisle
author_sort Dudek, Marcin
collection PubMed
description Flocculants are often added during produced water treatment to improve the crude oil droplet growth and separation from the water phase. Prior to use in the field, their performance is tested in laboratory conditions, typically with jar tests that require quite large volumes of sample. In this paper we present a microfluidic method as an alternative to study the efficiency of flocculants on enhancing coalescence between oil droplets. Two crude oil emulsions and four flocculants at different concentrations were tested. The new method is also compared to the more traditional techniques. An anionic flocculant showed the biggest improvement in separation for almost all systems. What is more, marked differences were observed between methods with static (bottle and turbidity tests) and dynamic test conditions (light scattering and microfluidics), where stabilization and dispersion effects were observed for the latter. The microfluidic methodology, with added benefits such as visualization, lower sample volumes and shorter measurement times, yielded similar trends as compared to other techniques. Overall, it was shown that microfluidics is a viable alternative to the standard tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7567950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75679502020-10-20 Microfluidic testing of flocculants for produced water treatment: Comparison with other methodologies Dudek, Marcin Ullaland, Hanne Skudal Wehrle, Amandine Øye, Gisle Water Res X Full Paper Flocculants are often added during produced water treatment to improve the crude oil droplet growth and separation from the water phase. Prior to use in the field, their performance is tested in laboratory conditions, typically with jar tests that require quite large volumes of sample. In this paper we present a microfluidic method as an alternative to study the efficiency of flocculants on enhancing coalescence between oil droplets. Two crude oil emulsions and four flocculants at different concentrations were tested. The new method is also compared to the more traditional techniques. An anionic flocculant showed the biggest improvement in separation for almost all systems. What is more, marked differences were observed between methods with static (bottle and turbidity tests) and dynamic test conditions (light scattering and microfluidics), where stabilization and dispersion effects were observed for the latter. The microfluidic methodology, with added benefits such as visualization, lower sample volumes and shorter measurement times, yielded similar trends as compared to other techniques. Overall, it was shown that microfluidics is a viable alternative to the standard tests. Elsevier 2020-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7567950/ /pubmed/33089131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100073 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full Paper
Dudek, Marcin
Ullaland, Hanne Skudal
Wehrle, Amandine
Øye, Gisle
Microfluidic testing of flocculants for produced water treatment: Comparison with other methodologies
title Microfluidic testing of flocculants for produced water treatment: Comparison with other methodologies
title_full Microfluidic testing of flocculants for produced water treatment: Comparison with other methodologies
title_fullStr Microfluidic testing of flocculants for produced water treatment: Comparison with other methodologies
title_full_unstemmed Microfluidic testing of flocculants for produced water treatment: Comparison with other methodologies
title_short Microfluidic testing of flocculants for produced water treatment: Comparison with other methodologies
title_sort microfluidic testing of flocculants for produced water treatment: comparison with other methodologies
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7567950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100073
work_keys_str_mv AT dudekmarcin microfluidictestingofflocculantsforproducedwatertreatmentcomparisonwithothermethodologies
AT ullalandhanneskudal microfluidictestingofflocculantsforproducedwatertreatmentcomparisonwithothermethodologies
AT wehrleamandine microfluidictestingofflocculantsforproducedwatertreatmentcomparisonwithothermethodologies
AT øyegisle microfluidictestingofflocculantsforproducedwatertreatmentcomparisonwithothermethodologies