Cargando…

A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND: Gomco or Plastibell devices are the most widely used method for circumcision. The present work was aimed to assess the incidence of complications in infants of ages up to six months in two used methods. METHODS: It was a prospective randomized study conducted at a pediatric surgery clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bawazir, Osama A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7567998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpam.2019.03.002
_version_ 1783596438566993920
author Bawazir, Osama A.
author_facet Bawazir, Osama A.
author_sort Bawazir, Osama A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gomco or Plastibell devices are the most widely used method for circumcision. The present work was aimed to assess the incidence of complications in infants of ages up to six months in two used methods. METHODS: It was a prospective randomized study conducted at a pediatric surgery clinic in 3 hospitals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Eight hundred and five children, their ages were less than 6 months were enrolled for the present work. Children were randomized into two groups: Groups P and G using Plastibell and Gomco Circumcision methods, respectively. Statistical analysis of data was performed by using SPSS Version 17. Chi-square test and independent sample t-test was applied to compare both qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively. P-value was considered as significant difference at <0.05. RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty three children were were enrolled in this investigation. Plastibell method was concomitant with low volume of bleeding in comparison with Gomco method (P < 0.001). Incidence of complications including infection, penile edema, proximal migration and redundant skin was higher in Plastibell device method (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Gomco circumcision is the safer method and is accompanied with lowest rate of complication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7567998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75679982020-10-21 A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia Bawazir, Osama A. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Gomco or Plastibell devices are the most widely used method for circumcision. The present work was aimed to assess the incidence of complications in infants of ages up to six months in two used methods. METHODS: It was a prospective randomized study conducted at a pediatric surgery clinic in 3 hospitals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Eight hundred and five children, their ages were less than 6 months were enrolled for the present work. Children were randomized into two groups: Groups P and G using Plastibell and Gomco Circumcision methods, respectively. Statistical analysis of data was performed by using SPSS Version 17. Chi-square test and independent sample t-test was applied to compare both qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively. P-value was considered as significant difference at <0.05. RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty three children were were enrolled in this investigation. Plastibell method was concomitant with low volume of bleeding in comparison with Gomco method (P < 0.001). Incidence of complications including infection, penile edema, proximal migration and redundant skin was higher in Plastibell device method (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Gomco circumcision is the safer method and is accompanied with lowest rate of complication. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2020-09 2019-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7567998/ /pubmed/33094142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpam.2019.03.002 Text en © 2019 Publishing services provided by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (General Organization), Saudi Arabia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Bawazir, Osama A.
A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia
title A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia
title_full A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia
title_short A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia
title_sort controlled trial of gomco versus plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in saudi arabia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7567998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpam.2019.03.002
work_keys_str_mv AT bawazirosamaa acontrolledtrialofgomcoversusplastibellforneonatalcircumcisionsinsaudiarabia
AT bawazirosamaa controlledtrialofgomcoversusplastibellforneonatalcircumcisionsinsaudiarabia