Cargando…

Multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis: joint modelling of multiple cancer types using summary statistics

BACKGROUND: Cancer atlases often provide estimates of cancer incidence, mortality or survival across small areas of a region or country. A recent example of a cancer atlas is the Australian cancer atlas (ACA), that provides interactive maps to visualise spatially smoothed estimates of cancer inciden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jahan, Farzana, Duncan, Earl W., Cramb, Susana M., Baade, Peter D., Mengersen, Kerrie L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33069256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-020-00234-0
_version_ 1783596503483285504
author Jahan, Farzana
Duncan, Earl W.
Cramb, Susana M.
Baade, Peter D.
Mengersen, Kerrie L.
author_facet Jahan, Farzana
Duncan, Earl W.
Cramb, Susana M.
Baade, Peter D.
Mengersen, Kerrie L.
author_sort Jahan, Farzana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cancer atlases often provide estimates of cancer incidence, mortality or survival across small areas of a region or country. A recent example of a cancer atlas is the Australian cancer atlas (ACA), that provides interactive maps to visualise spatially smoothed estimates of cancer incidence and survival for 20 different cancer types over 2148 small areas across Australia. METHODS: The present study proposes a multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis model, which can model multiple cancers jointly using summary measures without requiring access to the unit record data. This new approach is illustrated by modelling the publicly available spatially smoothed standardised incidence ratios for multiple cancers in the ACA divided into three groups: common, rare/less common and smoking-related. The multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis models are fitted to each group in order to explore any possible association between the cancers in three remoteness regions: major cities, regional and remote areas across Australia. The correlation between the pairs of cancers included in each multivariate model for a group was examined by computing the posterior correlation matrix for each cancer group in each region. The posterior correlation matrices in different remoteness regions were compared using Jennrich’s test of equality of correlation matrices (Jennrich in J Am Stat Assoc. 1970;65(330):904–12. 10.1080/01621459.1970.10481133). RESULTS: Substantive correlation was observed among some cancer types. There was evidence that the magnitude of this correlation varied according to remoteness of a region. For example, there has been significant negative correlation between prostate and lung cancer in major cities, but zero correlation found in regional and remote areas for the same pair of cancer types. High risk areas for specific combinations of cancer types were identified and visualised from the proposed model. CONCLUSIONS: Publicly available spatially smoothed disease estimates can be used to explore additional research questions by modelling multiple cancer types jointly. These proposed multivariate meta-analysis models could be useful when unit record data are unavailable because of privacy and confidentiality requirements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7568363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75683632020-10-20 Multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis: joint modelling of multiple cancer types using summary statistics Jahan, Farzana Duncan, Earl W. Cramb, Susana M. Baade, Peter D. Mengersen, Kerrie L. Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: Cancer atlases often provide estimates of cancer incidence, mortality or survival across small areas of a region or country. A recent example of a cancer atlas is the Australian cancer atlas (ACA), that provides interactive maps to visualise spatially smoothed estimates of cancer incidence and survival for 20 different cancer types over 2148 small areas across Australia. METHODS: The present study proposes a multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis model, which can model multiple cancers jointly using summary measures without requiring access to the unit record data. This new approach is illustrated by modelling the publicly available spatially smoothed standardised incidence ratios for multiple cancers in the ACA divided into three groups: common, rare/less common and smoking-related. The multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis models are fitted to each group in order to explore any possible association between the cancers in three remoteness regions: major cities, regional and remote areas across Australia. The correlation between the pairs of cancers included in each multivariate model for a group was examined by computing the posterior correlation matrix for each cancer group in each region. The posterior correlation matrices in different remoteness regions were compared using Jennrich’s test of equality of correlation matrices (Jennrich in J Am Stat Assoc. 1970;65(330):904–12. 10.1080/01621459.1970.10481133). RESULTS: Substantive correlation was observed among some cancer types. There was evidence that the magnitude of this correlation varied according to remoteness of a region. For example, there has been significant negative correlation between prostate and lung cancer in major cities, but zero correlation found in regional and remote areas for the same pair of cancer types. High risk areas for specific combinations of cancer types were identified and visualised from the proposed model. CONCLUSIONS: Publicly available spatially smoothed disease estimates can be used to explore additional research questions by modelling multiple cancer types jointly. These proposed multivariate meta-analysis models could be useful when unit record data are unavailable because of privacy and confidentiality requirements. BioMed Central 2020-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7568363/ /pubmed/33069256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-020-00234-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jahan, Farzana
Duncan, Earl W.
Cramb, Susana M.
Baade, Peter D.
Mengersen, Kerrie L.
Multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis: joint modelling of multiple cancer types using summary statistics
title Multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis: joint modelling of multiple cancer types using summary statistics
title_full Multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis: joint modelling of multiple cancer types using summary statistics
title_fullStr Multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis: joint modelling of multiple cancer types using summary statistics
title_full_unstemmed Multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis: joint modelling of multiple cancer types using summary statistics
title_short Multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis: joint modelling of multiple cancer types using summary statistics
title_sort multivariate bayesian meta-analysis: joint modelling of multiple cancer types using summary statistics
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33069256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-020-00234-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jahanfarzana multivariatebayesianmetaanalysisjointmodellingofmultiplecancertypesusingsummarystatistics
AT duncanearlw multivariatebayesianmetaanalysisjointmodellingofmultiplecancertypesusingsummarystatistics
AT crambsusanam multivariatebayesianmetaanalysisjointmodellingofmultiplecancertypesusingsummarystatistics
AT baadepeterd multivariatebayesianmetaanalysisjointmodellingofmultiplecancertypesusingsummarystatistics
AT mengersenkerriel multivariatebayesianmetaanalysisjointmodellingofmultiplecancertypesusingsummarystatistics