Cargando…

Validation of the Pandemic Emotional Impact Scale

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic represents the most universal shared stressor for the general United States (U.S) population in many decades. Due to the unprecedented circumstances of COVID-19, no existing questionnaires can comprehensively measure the multi-faceted psychological effects attributab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ballou, Sarah, Gray, Sarah, Palsson, Olafur S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33103127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100161
_version_ 1783596530246090752
author Ballou, Sarah
Gray, Sarah
Palsson, Olafur S.
author_facet Ballou, Sarah
Gray, Sarah
Palsson, Olafur S.
author_sort Ballou, Sarah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic represents the most universal shared stressor for the general United States (U.S) population in many decades. Due to the unprecedented circumstances of COVID-19, no existing questionnaires can comprehensively measure the multi-faceted psychological effects attributable to this health crisis. This study aimed to validate a measure for that purpose. METHODS: A 16-item questionnaire, the Pandemic Emotional Impact Scale (PEIS), was designed and subjected to initial validation in an internet survey completed by a nationally representative sample of 1500 adults living in the U.S. This survey was completed between May 18 and May 30, 2020, during the height of the pandemic’s impact on society. RESULTS: The PEIS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α ​= ​0.94) and Guttman split-half reliability (0.95). Exploratory factor analysis suggested two sub-scales -- emotional impact and pragmatic worries -- but these were highly correlated with the overall scale score suggesting that the total score can be used in most cases. The PEIS demonstrated good concurrent validity via robust positive correlations with anxiety, depression and stress, and negative correlations with quality of life and happiness. Criterion validity was supported by the finding that individuals who reported employment loss or loss of income due to the pandemic, had experienced COVID-19 infection in their household, or knew somebody personally who died from the pandemic, had elevated scores on the PEIS. CONCLUSIONS: The PEIS questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument that addresses a significant unmet need for a research instrument that can comprehensively measure pandemic-related effects on the emotional wellbeing of individuals in the U.S population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7568491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75684912020-10-19 Validation of the Pandemic Emotional Impact Scale Ballou, Sarah Gray, Sarah Palsson, Olafur S. Brain Behav Immun Health Full Length Article OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic represents the most universal shared stressor for the general United States (U.S) population in many decades. Due to the unprecedented circumstances of COVID-19, no existing questionnaires can comprehensively measure the multi-faceted psychological effects attributable to this health crisis. This study aimed to validate a measure for that purpose. METHODS: A 16-item questionnaire, the Pandemic Emotional Impact Scale (PEIS), was designed and subjected to initial validation in an internet survey completed by a nationally representative sample of 1500 adults living in the U.S. This survey was completed between May 18 and May 30, 2020, during the height of the pandemic’s impact on society. RESULTS: The PEIS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α ​= ​0.94) and Guttman split-half reliability (0.95). Exploratory factor analysis suggested two sub-scales -- emotional impact and pragmatic worries -- but these were highly correlated with the overall scale score suggesting that the total score can be used in most cases. The PEIS demonstrated good concurrent validity via robust positive correlations with anxiety, depression and stress, and negative correlations with quality of life and happiness. Criterion validity was supported by the finding that individuals who reported employment loss or loss of income due to the pandemic, had experienced COVID-19 infection in their household, or knew somebody personally who died from the pandemic, had elevated scores on the PEIS. CONCLUSIONS: The PEIS questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument that addresses a significant unmet need for a research instrument that can comprehensively measure pandemic-related effects on the emotional wellbeing of individuals in the U.S population. Elsevier 2020-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7568491/ /pubmed/33103127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100161 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full Length Article
Ballou, Sarah
Gray, Sarah
Palsson, Olafur S.
Validation of the Pandemic Emotional Impact Scale
title Validation of the Pandemic Emotional Impact Scale
title_full Validation of the Pandemic Emotional Impact Scale
title_fullStr Validation of the Pandemic Emotional Impact Scale
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Pandemic Emotional Impact Scale
title_short Validation of the Pandemic Emotional Impact Scale
title_sort validation of the pandemic emotional impact scale
topic Full Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33103127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100161
work_keys_str_mv AT ballousarah validationofthepandemicemotionalimpactscale
AT graysarah validationofthepandemicemotionalimpactscale
AT palssonolafurs validationofthepandemicemotionalimpactscale