Cargando…

Biologics to Improve Healing in Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Critical Review

Large and massive rotator cuff tears have the highest risk of retear. Common biologic modalities that can potentially reduce the retear rate and improve healing include platelet-rich plasma (PRP), scaffolds, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). PRP has been studied for its role in improving rotator cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldenberg, Brandon T, Lacheta, Lucca, Dekker, Travis J, Spratt, James D, Nolte, Philip C, Millett, Peter J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116954
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S260657
_version_ 1783596574175133696
author Goldenberg, Brandon T
Lacheta, Lucca
Dekker, Travis J
Spratt, James D
Nolte, Philip C
Millett, Peter J
author_facet Goldenberg, Brandon T
Lacheta, Lucca
Dekker, Travis J
Spratt, James D
Nolte, Philip C
Millett, Peter J
author_sort Goldenberg, Brandon T
collection PubMed
description Large and massive rotator cuff tears have the highest risk of retear. Common biologic modalities that can potentially reduce the retear rate and improve healing include platelet-rich plasma (PRP), scaffolds, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). PRP has been studied for its role in improving rotator cuff healing and results of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses show mixed results. Most studies in large and massivge tears show that PRP decreases the retear rate, but the connection between structural integrity and clinical outcomes is still unknown. Extracellular matrix (ECM) and synthetic scaffolds can increase healing in augmentation and bridging repair. Acellular dermal allografts have shown better healing rates and outcomes than xenografts in meta-analyses. Synthetic scaffolds augmented with bone marrow-derived stem cells have only been studied in vitro but are promising for the combination of mechanical stability and induction of a biological response. Superior capsule reconstruction is an exciting type of interposition graft reconstruction that has shown favorable early clinical outcomes for large and massive tears. Bone marrow-derived stem cells and adipose-derived stem cells improve the biomechanical characteristics of tendon repair and enhance the histological findings of the healing process in animal studies. However, evidence from human studies is lacking, especially in patients with large and massive tears. In summary, there are many biological options to augment rotator cuff repair in patients with large and massive tears. Due to mixed results and a lack of standardization in high-quality studies, we cannot recommend PRP at this time as an adjunct to rotator cuff repair. Both ECM and synthetic scaffolds, as well as SCR, can be used, especially in situations where native tendon is compromised, and additional mechanical augmentation is needed. Stem cells have been the least studied to date, so it is difficult to give recommendations for or against their use at this time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7568683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75686832020-10-27 Biologics to Improve Healing in Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Critical Review Goldenberg, Brandon T Lacheta, Lucca Dekker, Travis J Spratt, James D Nolte, Philip C Millett, Peter J Orthop Res Rev Review Large and massive rotator cuff tears have the highest risk of retear. Common biologic modalities that can potentially reduce the retear rate and improve healing include platelet-rich plasma (PRP), scaffolds, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). PRP has been studied for its role in improving rotator cuff healing and results of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses show mixed results. Most studies in large and massivge tears show that PRP decreases the retear rate, but the connection between structural integrity and clinical outcomes is still unknown. Extracellular matrix (ECM) and synthetic scaffolds can increase healing in augmentation and bridging repair. Acellular dermal allografts have shown better healing rates and outcomes than xenografts in meta-analyses. Synthetic scaffolds augmented with bone marrow-derived stem cells have only been studied in vitro but are promising for the combination of mechanical stability and induction of a biological response. Superior capsule reconstruction is an exciting type of interposition graft reconstruction that has shown favorable early clinical outcomes for large and massive tears. Bone marrow-derived stem cells and adipose-derived stem cells improve the biomechanical characteristics of tendon repair and enhance the histological findings of the healing process in animal studies. However, evidence from human studies is lacking, especially in patients with large and massive tears. In summary, there are many biological options to augment rotator cuff repair in patients with large and massive tears. Due to mixed results and a lack of standardization in high-quality studies, we cannot recommend PRP at this time as an adjunct to rotator cuff repair. Both ECM and synthetic scaffolds, as well as SCR, can be used, especially in situations where native tendon is compromised, and additional mechanical augmentation is needed. Stem cells have been the least studied to date, so it is difficult to give recommendations for or against their use at this time. Dove 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7568683/ /pubmed/33116954 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S260657 Text en © 2020 Goldenberg et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Goldenberg, Brandon T
Lacheta, Lucca
Dekker, Travis J
Spratt, James D
Nolte, Philip C
Millett, Peter J
Biologics to Improve Healing in Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Critical Review
title Biologics to Improve Healing in Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Critical Review
title_full Biologics to Improve Healing in Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Critical Review
title_fullStr Biologics to Improve Healing in Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed Biologics to Improve Healing in Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Critical Review
title_short Biologics to Improve Healing in Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Critical Review
title_sort biologics to improve healing in large and massive rotator cuff tears: a critical review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116954
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S260657
work_keys_str_mv AT goldenbergbrandont biologicstoimprovehealinginlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsacriticalreview
AT lachetalucca biologicstoimprovehealinginlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsacriticalreview
AT dekkertravisj biologicstoimprovehealinginlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsacriticalreview
AT sprattjamesd biologicstoimprovehealinginlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsacriticalreview
AT noltephilipc biologicstoimprovehealinginlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsacriticalreview
AT millettpeterj biologicstoimprovehealinginlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsacriticalreview