Cargando…
Fully automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in cardiac MRI: clinical evaluation of a deep learning-based algorithm
To investigate the performance of a deep learning-based algorithm for fully automated quantification of left ventricular (LV) volumes and function in cardiac MRI. We retrospectively analysed MR examinations of 50 patients (74% men, median age 57 years). The most common indications were known or susp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32677023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01935-0 |
_version_ | 1783596579299524608 |
---|---|
author | Böttcher, Benjamin Beller, Ebba Busse, Anke Cantré, Daniel Yücel, Seyrani Öner, Alper Ince, Hüseyin Weber, Marc-André Meinel, Felix G. |
author_facet | Böttcher, Benjamin Beller, Ebba Busse, Anke Cantré, Daniel Yücel, Seyrani Öner, Alper Ince, Hüseyin Weber, Marc-André Meinel, Felix G. |
author_sort | Böttcher, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | To investigate the performance of a deep learning-based algorithm for fully automated quantification of left ventricular (LV) volumes and function in cardiac MRI. We retrospectively analysed MR examinations of 50 patients (74% men, median age 57 years). The most common indications were known or suspected ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathies or myocarditis. Fully automated analysis of LV volumes and function was performed using a deep learning-based algorithm. The analysis was subsequently corrected by a senior cardiovascular radiologist. Manual volumetric analysis was performed by two radiology trainees. Volumetric results were compared using Bland–Altman statistics and intra-class correlation coefficient. The frequency of clinically relevant differences was analysed using re-classification rates. The fully automated volumetric analysis was completed in a median of 8 s. With expert review and corrections, the analysis required a median of 110 s. Median time required for manual analysis was 3.5 min for a cardiovascular imaging fellow and 9 min for a radiology resident (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). The correlation between fully automated results and expert-corrected results was very strong with intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.998 for end-diastolic volume, 0.997 for end-systolic volume, 0.899 for stroke volume, 0.972 for ejection fraction and 0.991 for myocardial mass (all p < 0.001). Clinically meaningful differences between fully automated and expert corrected results occurred in 18% of cases, comparable to the rate between the two manual readers (20%). Deep learning-based fully automated analysis of LV volumes and function is feasible, time-efficient and highly accurate. Clinically relevant corrections are required in a minority of cases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10554-020-01935-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7568707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75687072020-10-19 Fully automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in cardiac MRI: clinical evaluation of a deep learning-based algorithm Böttcher, Benjamin Beller, Ebba Busse, Anke Cantré, Daniel Yücel, Seyrani Öner, Alper Ince, Hüseyin Weber, Marc-André Meinel, Felix G. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper To investigate the performance of a deep learning-based algorithm for fully automated quantification of left ventricular (LV) volumes and function in cardiac MRI. We retrospectively analysed MR examinations of 50 patients (74% men, median age 57 years). The most common indications were known or suspected ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathies or myocarditis. Fully automated analysis of LV volumes and function was performed using a deep learning-based algorithm. The analysis was subsequently corrected by a senior cardiovascular radiologist. Manual volumetric analysis was performed by two radiology trainees. Volumetric results were compared using Bland–Altman statistics and intra-class correlation coefficient. The frequency of clinically relevant differences was analysed using re-classification rates. The fully automated volumetric analysis was completed in a median of 8 s. With expert review and corrections, the analysis required a median of 110 s. Median time required for manual analysis was 3.5 min for a cardiovascular imaging fellow and 9 min for a radiology resident (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). The correlation between fully automated results and expert-corrected results was very strong with intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.998 for end-diastolic volume, 0.997 for end-systolic volume, 0.899 for stroke volume, 0.972 for ejection fraction and 0.991 for myocardial mass (all p < 0.001). Clinically meaningful differences between fully automated and expert corrected results occurred in 18% of cases, comparable to the rate between the two manual readers (20%). Deep learning-based fully automated analysis of LV volumes and function is feasible, time-efficient and highly accurate. Clinically relevant corrections are required in a minority of cases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10554-020-01935-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2020-07-16 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7568707/ /pubmed/32677023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01935-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Böttcher, Benjamin Beller, Ebba Busse, Anke Cantré, Daniel Yücel, Seyrani Öner, Alper Ince, Hüseyin Weber, Marc-André Meinel, Felix G. Fully automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in cardiac MRI: clinical evaluation of a deep learning-based algorithm |
title | Fully automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in cardiac MRI: clinical evaluation of a deep learning-based algorithm |
title_full | Fully automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in cardiac MRI: clinical evaluation of a deep learning-based algorithm |
title_fullStr | Fully automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in cardiac MRI: clinical evaluation of a deep learning-based algorithm |
title_full_unstemmed | Fully automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in cardiac MRI: clinical evaluation of a deep learning-based algorithm |
title_short | Fully automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in cardiac MRI: clinical evaluation of a deep learning-based algorithm |
title_sort | fully automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in cardiac mri: clinical evaluation of a deep learning-based algorithm |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32677023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01935-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bottcherbenjamin fullyautomatedquantificationofleftventricularvolumesandfunctionincardiacmriclinicalevaluationofadeeplearningbasedalgorithm AT bellerebba fullyautomatedquantificationofleftventricularvolumesandfunctionincardiacmriclinicalevaluationofadeeplearningbasedalgorithm AT busseanke fullyautomatedquantificationofleftventricularvolumesandfunctionincardiacmriclinicalevaluationofadeeplearningbasedalgorithm AT cantredaniel fullyautomatedquantificationofleftventricularvolumesandfunctionincardiacmriclinicalevaluationofadeeplearningbasedalgorithm AT yucelseyrani fullyautomatedquantificationofleftventricularvolumesandfunctionincardiacmriclinicalevaluationofadeeplearningbasedalgorithm AT oneralper fullyautomatedquantificationofleftventricularvolumesandfunctionincardiacmriclinicalevaluationofadeeplearningbasedalgorithm AT incehuseyin fullyautomatedquantificationofleftventricularvolumesandfunctionincardiacmriclinicalevaluationofadeeplearningbasedalgorithm AT webermarcandre fullyautomatedquantificationofleftventricularvolumesandfunctionincardiacmriclinicalevaluationofadeeplearningbasedalgorithm AT meinelfelixg fullyautomatedquantificationofleftventricularvolumesandfunctionincardiacmriclinicalevaluationofadeeplearningbasedalgorithm |