Cargando…
Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research
The bioeconomy is currently being globally promoted as a sustainability avenue involving several societal actors. While the bioeconomy is broadly about the substitution of fossil resources with bio-based ones, three main (competing or complementary) bioeconomy visions are emerging in scientific lite...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33044700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0 |
_version_ | 1783596585554280448 |
---|---|
author | D’Amato, Dalia Bartkowski, Bartosz Droste, Nils |
author_facet | D’Amato, Dalia Bartkowski, Bartosz Droste, Nils |
author_sort | D’Amato, Dalia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The bioeconomy is currently being globally promoted as a sustainability avenue involving several societal actors. While the bioeconomy is broadly about the substitution of fossil resources with bio-based ones, three main (competing or complementary) bioeconomy visions are emerging in scientific literature: resource, biotechnology, and agroecology. The implementation of one or more of these visions into strategies implies changes to land use and thus ecosystem services delivery, with notable trade-offs. This review aims to explore the interdisciplinary space at the interface of these two concepts. We reviewed scientific publications explicitly referring to bioeconomy and ecosystem services in their title, abstract, or keywords, with 45 documents identified as relevant. The literature appeared to be emerging and fragmented but eight themes were discernible (in order of decreasing occurrence frequency in the literature): a. technical and economic feasibility of biomass extraction and use; b. potential and challenges of the bioeconomy; c. frameworks and tools; d. sustainability of bio-based processes, products, and services; e. environmental sustainability of the bioeconomy; f. governance of the bioeconomy; g. biosecurity; h. bioremediation. Approximately half of the documents aligned to a resource vision of the bioeconomy, with emphasis on biomass production. Agroecology and biotechnology visions were less frequently found, but multiple visions generally tended to occur in each document. The discussion highlights gaps in the current research on the topic and argues for communication between the ecosystem services and bioeconomy communities to forward both research areas in the context of sustainability science. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7568744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75687442020-10-21 Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research D’Amato, Dalia Bartkowski, Bartosz Droste, Nils Ambio Social Dimensions of a Forest-Based Bioeconomy The bioeconomy is currently being globally promoted as a sustainability avenue involving several societal actors. While the bioeconomy is broadly about the substitution of fossil resources with bio-based ones, three main (competing or complementary) bioeconomy visions are emerging in scientific literature: resource, biotechnology, and agroecology. The implementation of one or more of these visions into strategies implies changes to land use and thus ecosystem services delivery, with notable trade-offs. This review aims to explore the interdisciplinary space at the interface of these two concepts. We reviewed scientific publications explicitly referring to bioeconomy and ecosystem services in their title, abstract, or keywords, with 45 documents identified as relevant. The literature appeared to be emerging and fragmented but eight themes were discernible (in order of decreasing occurrence frequency in the literature): a. technical and economic feasibility of biomass extraction and use; b. potential and challenges of the bioeconomy; c. frameworks and tools; d. sustainability of bio-based processes, products, and services; e. environmental sustainability of the bioeconomy; f. governance of the bioeconomy; g. biosecurity; h. bioremediation. Approximately half of the documents aligned to a resource vision of the bioeconomy, with emphasis on biomass production. Agroecology and biotechnology visions were less frequently found, but multiple visions generally tended to occur in each document. The discussion highlights gaps in the current research on the topic and argues for communication between the ecosystem services and bioeconomy communities to forward both research areas in the context of sustainability science. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2020-10-12 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7568744/ /pubmed/33044700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Social Dimensions of a Forest-Based Bioeconomy D’Amato, Dalia Bartkowski, Bartosz Droste, Nils Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research |
title | Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research |
title_full | Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research |
title_fullStr | Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research |
title_full_unstemmed | Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research |
title_short | Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research |
title_sort | reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research |
topic | Social Dimensions of a Forest-Based Bioeconomy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33044700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT damatodalia reviewingtheinterfaceofbioeconomyandecosystemserviceresearch AT bartkowskibartosz reviewingtheinterfaceofbioeconomyandecosystemserviceresearch AT drostenils reviewingtheinterfaceofbioeconomyandecosystemserviceresearch |