Cargando…

Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research

The bioeconomy is currently being globally promoted as a sustainability avenue involving several societal actors. While the bioeconomy is broadly about the substitution of fossil resources with bio-based ones, three main (competing or complementary) bioeconomy visions are emerging in scientific lite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Amato, Dalia, Bartkowski, Bartosz, Droste, Nils
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33044700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0
_version_ 1783596585554280448
author D’Amato, Dalia
Bartkowski, Bartosz
Droste, Nils
author_facet D’Amato, Dalia
Bartkowski, Bartosz
Droste, Nils
author_sort D’Amato, Dalia
collection PubMed
description The bioeconomy is currently being globally promoted as a sustainability avenue involving several societal actors. While the bioeconomy is broadly about the substitution of fossil resources with bio-based ones, three main (competing or complementary) bioeconomy visions are emerging in scientific literature: resource, biotechnology, and agroecology. The implementation of one or more of these visions into strategies implies changes to land use and thus ecosystem services delivery, with notable trade-offs. This review aims to explore the interdisciplinary space at the interface of these two concepts. We reviewed scientific publications explicitly referring to bioeconomy and ecosystem services in their title, abstract, or keywords, with 45 documents identified as relevant. The literature appeared to be emerging and fragmented but eight themes were discernible (in order of decreasing occurrence frequency in the literature): a. technical and economic feasibility of biomass extraction and use; b. potential and challenges of the bioeconomy; c. frameworks and tools; d. sustainability of bio-based processes, products, and services; e. environmental sustainability of the bioeconomy; f. governance of the bioeconomy; g. biosecurity; h. bioremediation. Approximately half of the documents aligned to a resource vision of the bioeconomy, with emphasis on biomass production. Agroecology and biotechnology visions were less frequently found, but multiple visions generally tended to occur in each document. The discussion highlights gaps in the current research on the topic and argues for communication between the ecosystem services and bioeconomy communities to forward both research areas in the context of sustainability science. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7568744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75687442020-10-21 Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research D’Amato, Dalia Bartkowski, Bartosz Droste, Nils Ambio Social Dimensions of a Forest-Based Bioeconomy The bioeconomy is currently being globally promoted as a sustainability avenue involving several societal actors. While the bioeconomy is broadly about the substitution of fossil resources with bio-based ones, three main (competing or complementary) bioeconomy visions are emerging in scientific literature: resource, biotechnology, and agroecology. The implementation of one or more of these visions into strategies implies changes to land use and thus ecosystem services delivery, with notable trade-offs. This review aims to explore the interdisciplinary space at the interface of these two concepts. We reviewed scientific publications explicitly referring to bioeconomy and ecosystem services in their title, abstract, or keywords, with 45 documents identified as relevant. The literature appeared to be emerging and fragmented but eight themes were discernible (in order of decreasing occurrence frequency in the literature): a. technical and economic feasibility of biomass extraction and use; b. potential and challenges of the bioeconomy; c. frameworks and tools; d. sustainability of bio-based processes, products, and services; e. environmental sustainability of the bioeconomy; f. governance of the bioeconomy; g. biosecurity; h. bioremediation. Approximately half of the documents aligned to a resource vision of the bioeconomy, with emphasis on biomass production. Agroecology and biotechnology visions were less frequently found, but multiple visions generally tended to occur in each document. The discussion highlights gaps in the current research on the topic and argues for communication between the ecosystem services and bioeconomy communities to forward both research areas in the context of sustainability science. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2020-10-12 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7568744/ /pubmed/33044700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Social Dimensions of a Forest-Based Bioeconomy
D’Amato, Dalia
Bartkowski, Bartosz
Droste, Nils
Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research
title Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research
title_full Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research
title_fullStr Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research
title_full_unstemmed Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research
title_short Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research
title_sort reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research
topic Social Dimensions of a Forest-Based Bioeconomy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33044700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0
work_keys_str_mv AT damatodalia reviewingtheinterfaceofbioeconomyandecosystemserviceresearch
AT bartkowskibartosz reviewingtheinterfaceofbioeconomyandecosystemserviceresearch
AT drostenils reviewingtheinterfaceofbioeconomyandecosystemserviceresearch