Cargando…

Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): Where Are We Now?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative approach to breast conserving therapy (BCT) where radiation (RT) is delivered over a shorter period of time compared with whole breast irradiation (WBI), resulting in improved patient convenience and cost savings. APB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldberg, Mira, Whelan, Timothy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12609-020-00384-x
_version_ 1783596604440182784
author Goldberg, Mira
Whelan, Timothy J.
author_facet Goldberg, Mira
Whelan, Timothy J.
author_sort Goldberg, Mira
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative approach to breast conserving therapy (BCT) where radiation (RT) is delivered over a shorter period of time compared with whole breast irradiation (WBI), resulting in improved patient convenience and cost savings. APBI can be delivered using brachytherapy, intraoperative RT, or conformal external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) techniques. In this review, the authors appraise the latest modern randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of APBI and discuss the application of the data to clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: The OCOG-RAPID and NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 trials recently reported long-term outcomes of APBI. The OCOG-RAPID trial delivered 38.5 Gy/10 fractions twice daily (at least 6 h apart using EBRT) or WBI and demonstrated non-inferiority of APBI compared with WBI (8-year cumulative rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) was 3% after APBI or 2.8% after WBI, HR 1.27, 90%CI: 0.84–1.91). While acute toxicity was reduced, late toxicity and breast cosmesis were worse with APBI. The NSABP B-39 trial included higher risk patients and was unable to demonstrate equivalence between APBI (38.5 Gy/10 fractions delivered twice daily using EBRT or brachytherapy techniques) and WBI. However, 10-year IBTR rates were low: 4.6% vs. 3.9%, respectively, HR 1.22, 90%CI: 0.94–1.58. The University of Florence demonstrated low rates of local recurrence at 10 years and overall excellent breast cosmetic outcomes when APBI was delivered using EBRT to a dose of 30 Gy/5 fractions delivered on non-consecutive days. SUMMARY: Recent RCTs of APBI have shed light on important factors for the integration of APBI into clinical practice, including patient selection and treatment delivery. APBI should be limited to patients with low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ or early stage (T1) invasive ductal cancer with clear margins of excision, estrogen receptor positivity, and node negative disease. Ongoing research should focus on the optimal dose/fractionation for delivery of EBRT-based APBI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7568840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75688402020-10-19 Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): Where Are We Now? Goldberg, Mira Whelan, Timothy J. Curr Breast Cancer Rep Radiation Oncology (W Woodward, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative approach to breast conserving therapy (BCT) where radiation (RT) is delivered over a shorter period of time compared with whole breast irradiation (WBI), resulting in improved patient convenience and cost savings. APBI can be delivered using brachytherapy, intraoperative RT, or conformal external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) techniques. In this review, the authors appraise the latest modern randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of APBI and discuss the application of the data to clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: The OCOG-RAPID and NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 trials recently reported long-term outcomes of APBI. The OCOG-RAPID trial delivered 38.5 Gy/10 fractions twice daily (at least 6 h apart using EBRT) or WBI and demonstrated non-inferiority of APBI compared with WBI (8-year cumulative rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) was 3% after APBI or 2.8% after WBI, HR 1.27, 90%CI: 0.84–1.91). While acute toxicity was reduced, late toxicity and breast cosmesis were worse with APBI. The NSABP B-39 trial included higher risk patients and was unable to demonstrate equivalence between APBI (38.5 Gy/10 fractions delivered twice daily using EBRT or brachytherapy techniques) and WBI. However, 10-year IBTR rates were low: 4.6% vs. 3.9%, respectively, HR 1.22, 90%CI: 0.94–1.58. The University of Florence demonstrated low rates of local recurrence at 10 years and overall excellent breast cosmetic outcomes when APBI was delivered using EBRT to a dose of 30 Gy/5 fractions delivered on non-consecutive days. SUMMARY: Recent RCTs of APBI have shed light on important factors for the integration of APBI into clinical practice, including patient selection and treatment delivery. APBI should be limited to patients with low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ or early stage (T1) invasive ductal cancer with clear margins of excision, estrogen receptor positivity, and node negative disease. Ongoing research should focus on the optimal dose/fractionation for delivery of EBRT-based APBI. Springer US 2020-10-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7568840/ /pubmed/33101597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12609-020-00384-x Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology (W Woodward, Section Editor)
Goldberg, Mira
Whelan, Timothy J.
Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): Where Are We Now?
title Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): Where Are We Now?
title_full Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): Where Are We Now?
title_fullStr Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): Where Are We Now?
title_full_unstemmed Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): Where Are We Now?
title_short Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): Where Are We Now?
title_sort accelerated partial breast irradiation (apbi): where are we now?
topic Radiation Oncology (W Woodward, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12609-020-00384-x
work_keys_str_mv AT goldbergmira acceleratedpartialbreastirradiationapbiwherearewenow
AT whelantimothyj acceleratedpartialbreastirradiationapbiwherearewenow