Cargando…

Post-Caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms

Caesarean section can result in an indentation of the myometrium at the site of the Caesarean scar, called a niche. Niches can cause symptoms of abnormal uterine blood loss, dysmenorrhoea, chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia and are possibly related to subfertility. Various other explanations for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vissers, Jolijn, Hehenkamp, Wouter, Lambalk, Cornelis Bavo, Huirne, Judith Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32613231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa094
_version_ 1783596619694866432
author Vissers, Jolijn
Hehenkamp, Wouter
Lambalk, Cornelis Bavo
Huirne, Judith Anna
author_facet Vissers, Jolijn
Hehenkamp, Wouter
Lambalk, Cornelis Bavo
Huirne, Judith Anna
author_sort Vissers, Jolijn
collection PubMed
description Caesarean section can result in an indentation of the myometrium at the site of the Caesarean scar, called a niche. Niches can cause symptoms of abnormal uterine blood loss, dysmenorrhoea, chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia and are possibly related to subfertility. Various other explanations for the cause of subfertility after Caesarean section have been proposed in the literature, such as uterine pathology, intra-abdominal adhesions and women’s reproductive choices. Not all niches cause symptoms and the relation with subfertility and a niche in the uterine scar still needs further study since direct evidence is lacking so far. Based on the limited available evidence, and in combination with observations made during sonographic hysteroscopic evaluations and laparoscopic niche repair, we propose and discuss three hypothetical mechanisms: (i) the environment for sperm penetration and implantation may be detrimental; (ii) there could be a physical barrier to embryo transfer and implantation; and (iii) psychogenic factors may reduce the likelihood of pregnancy. Several innovative surgical treatments have been developed and are being implemented for niche-related problems. Promising results are reported, but more evidence is needed before further implementation in daily practice. The additional value of niche resections should be compared to expectant management or fertility therapies, such as ART, in randomized controlled trials. Therefore, our suggested hypotheses should, for the time being, not be used for justification of any specific procedures outside clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7568911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75689112020-10-22 Post-Caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms Vissers, Jolijn Hehenkamp, Wouter Lambalk, Cornelis Bavo Huirne, Judith Anna Hum Reprod Opinion Caesarean section can result in an indentation of the myometrium at the site of the Caesarean scar, called a niche. Niches can cause symptoms of abnormal uterine blood loss, dysmenorrhoea, chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia and are possibly related to subfertility. Various other explanations for the cause of subfertility after Caesarean section have been proposed in the literature, such as uterine pathology, intra-abdominal adhesions and women’s reproductive choices. Not all niches cause symptoms and the relation with subfertility and a niche in the uterine scar still needs further study since direct evidence is lacking so far. Based on the limited available evidence, and in combination with observations made during sonographic hysteroscopic evaluations and laparoscopic niche repair, we propose and discuss three hypothetical mechanisms: (i) the environment for sperm penetration and implantation may be detrimental; (ii) there could be a physical barrier to embryo transfer and implantation; and (iii) psychogenic factors may reduce the likelihood of pregnancy. Several innovative surgical treatments have been developed and are being implemented for niche-related problems. Promising results are reported, but more evidence is needed before further implementation in daily practice. The additional value of niche resections should be compared to expectant management or fertility therapies, such as ART, in randomized controlled trials. Therefore, our suggested hypotheses should, for the time being, not be used for justification of any specific procedures outside clinical trials. Oxford University Press 2020-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7568911/ /pubmed/32613231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa094 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Opinion
Vissers, Jolijn
Hehenkamp, Wouter
Lambalk, Cornelis Bavo
Huirne, Judith Anna
Post-Caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms
title Post-Caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms
title_full Post-Caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms
title_fullStr Post-Caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Post-Caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms
title_short Post-Caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms
title_sort post-caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32613231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa094
work_keys_str_mv AT vissersjolijn postcaesareansectionnicherelatedimpairedfertilityhypotheticalmechanisms
AT hehenkampwouter postcaesareansectionnicherelatedimpairedfertilityhypotheticalmechanisms
AT lambalkcornelisbavo postcaesareansectionnicherelatedimpairedfertilityhypotheticalmechanisms
AT huirnejudithanna postcaesareansectionnicherelatedimpairedfertilityhypotheticalmechanisms