Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Therapy for T1DM: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The long-term insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) fails to achieve optimal glycemic control and avoid adverse events simultaneously. Stem cells have unique immunomodulatory capacities and have been considered as a promising interventional strategy for T1DM. Stem cell ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Shi-Yi, Gao, Yun, Liu, Guan-Jian, Li, Yong-Kun, Gao, Wei, Ran, Xing-Wu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33102605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5740923
_version_ 1783596730336411648
author Sun, Shi-Yi
Gao, Yun
Liu, Guan-Jian
Li, Yong-Kun
Gao, Wei
Ran, Xing-Wu
author_facet Sun, Shi-Yi
Gao, Yun
Liu, Guan-Jian
Li, Yong-Kun
Gao, Wei
Ran, Xing-Wu
author_sort Sun, Shi-Yi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The long-term insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) fails to achieve optimal glycemic control and avoid adverse events simultaneously. Stem cells have unique immunomodulatory capacities and have been considered as a promising interventional strategy for T1DM. Stem cell therapy in T1DM has been tried in many studies. However, the results were controversial. We thus performed a meta-analysis to update the efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in patients with T1DM. METHODS: We systematically searched the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, Wan Fang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP database, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed) for relevant studies published before March 19, 2019. The outcomes included parameters for glycemic control (i.e., glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and insulin dosages), β cell function (i.e., fasting C-peptide levels and area-under-curve of C-peptide concentration (AUCC)), and relative risk of adverse events. Statistical analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eight nonrandomized concurrent control trials (NRCCTs) with a total of 396 individuals were finally included into the meta-analysis. Among RCTs, stem cell therapy could significantly reduce HbA1c levels (MD = −1.20, 95% CI -1.91 to -0.49, P = 0.0009) and increase fasting C-peptide levels (MD = 0.25, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.45, P = 0.02) and AUCC (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.18, P = 0.01). Stem cell therapy could also reduce insulin dosages (SMD = −2.65, 95% CI -4.86 to -0.45, P = 0.02) at 6 months after treatment. NRCCTs also had consistent results. Furthermore, RCTs showed stem cell therapy did not increase relative risk of gastrointestinal symptom (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.14 to 3.28, P = 0.64) and infection (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.34, P = 0.95). However, NRCCTs showed stem cell therapy increased relative risk of gastrointestinal symptom (RR = 44.49, 95% CI 9.20 to 215.18, P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Stem cell therapy for T1DM may improve glycemic control and β cell function without increasing the risk of serious adverse events. Stem cell therapy may also have a short-term (3-6 months) effect on reducing insulin dosages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7569432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75694322020-10-22 Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Therapy for T1DM: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sun, Shi-Yi Gao, Yun Liu, Guan-Jian Li, Yong-Kun Gao, Wei Ran, Xing-Wu J Diabetes Res Review Article BACKGROUND: The long-term insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) fails to achieve optimal glycemic control and avoid adverse events simultaneously. Stem cells have unique immunomodulatory capacities and have been considered as a promising interventional strategy for T1DM. Stem cell therapy in T1DM has been tried in many studies. However, the results were controversial. We thus performed a meta-analysis to update the efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in patients with T1DM. METHODS: We systematically searched the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, Wan Fang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP database, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed) for relevant studies published before March 19, 2019. The outcomes included parameters for glycemic control (i.e., glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and insulin dosages), β cell function (i.e., fasting C-peptide levels and area-under-curve of C-peptide concentration (AUCC)), and relative risk of adverse events. Statistical analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eight nonrandomized concurrent control trials (NRCCTs) with a total of 396 individuals were finally included into the meta-analysis. Among RCTs, stem cell therapy could significantly reduce HbA1c levels (MD = −1.20, 95% CI -1.91 to -0.49, P = 0.0009) and increase fasting C-peptide levels (MD = 0.25, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.45, P = 0.02) and AUCC (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.18, P = 0.01). Stem cell therapy could also reduce insulin dosages (SMD = −2.65, 95% CI -4.86 to -0.45, P = 0.02) at 6 months after treatment. NRCCTs also had consistent results. Furthermore, RCTs showed stem cell therapy did not increase relative risk of gastrointestinal symptom (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.14 to 3.28, P = 0.64) and infection (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.34, P = 0.95). However, NRCCTs showed stem cell therapy increased relative risk of gastrointestinal symptom (RR = 44.49, 95% CI 9.20 to 215.18, P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Stem cell therapy for T1DM may improve glycemic control and β cell function without increasing the risk of serious adverse events. Stem cell therapy may also have a short-term (3-6 months) effect on reducing insulin dosages. Hindawi 2020-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7569432/ /pubmed/33102605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5740923 Text en Copyright © 2020 Shi-Yi Sun et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Sun, Shi-Yi
Gao, Yun
Liu, Guan-Jian
Li, Yong-Kun
Gao, Wei
Ran, Xing-Wu
Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Therapy for T1DM: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Therapy for T1DM: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Therapy for T1DM: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Therapy for T1DM: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Therapy for T1DM: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Therapy for T1DM: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for t1dm: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33102605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5740923
work_keys_str_mv AT sunshiyi efficacyandsafetyofstemcelltherapyfort1dmanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaoyun efficacyandsafetyofstemcelltherapyfort1dmanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuguanjian efficacyandsafetyofstemcelltherapyfort1dmanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyongkun efficacyandsafetyofstemcelltherapyfort1dmanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaowei efficacyandsafetyofstemcelltherapyfort1dmanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ranxingwu efficacyandsafetyofstemcelltherapyfort1dmanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis