Cargando…

Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center

INTRODUCTION: T1 bladder cancer is associated with a high risk of recurrence and progression; concomitant carcinoma in situ and/or multifocality are negative prognostic factors. Persistent disease after resection of T1 tumours has been observed in 33-55% of patients, and after resection of High-grad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maltagliati, Matteo, Varca, Virginia, Milandri, Riccardo, Salvatore, Micali, Rocco, Bernardo Maria Cesare, Gregori, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420968
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i2.8618
_version_ 1783596769141063680
author Maltagliati, Matteo
Varca, Virginia
Milandri, Riccardo
Salvatore, Micali
Rocco, Bernardo Maria Cesare
Gregori, Andrea
author_facet Maltagliati, Matteo
Varca, Virginia
Milandri, Riccardo
Salvatore, Micali
Rocco, Bernardo Maria Cesare
Gregori, Andrea
author_sort Maltagliati, Matteo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: T1 bladder cancer is associated with a high risk of recurrence and progression; concomitant carcinoma in situ and/or multifocality are negative prognostic factors. Persistent disease after resection of T1 tumours has been observed in 33-55% of patients, and after resection of High-grade (HG) Ta tumour in 41,4%. It has been demonstrated that a second TURB can increase recurrence-free survival and it can make a restaging of the cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2016, 87 patients with superficial bladder tumor (Ta-T1), undergoing TURB and routine repeat TURB (Re-TURB) 4-6 weeks after the initial resection, were included in the study. Re-TURB was applied to the scar of the first resection and other suspicious lesions in the bladder. After the second-look, we studied the follow-up of each patient. RESULTS: Specimens obtained during the second TURBT showed no tumor in 47 (54,02%) patients; 40 (45,98%) patients had residual cancer: 34 of them had cancer of the same stage, 6 patients of pT1 had a lower stage, and 3 had a higher stage. 5 patient underwent radical cistectomy immediatly after re-TURBT. During the first year of follow up, 15 patients had a recurrent bladder cancer; 2 of them underwent radical cistectomy. CONCLUSIONS: T1 bladder cancer is an high risk tumor, so that second-look TURBT is a valuable procedure for accurate staging of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer and it can guarantee a better eradication of the neoplasm. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7569633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75696332020-10-21 Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center Maltagliati, Matteo Varca, Virginia Milandri, Riccardo Salvatore, Micali Rocco, Bernardo Maria Cesare Gregori, Andrea Acta Biomed Original Article INTRODUCTION: T1 bladder cancer is associated with a high risk of recurrence and progression; concomitant carcinoma in situ and/or multifocality are negative prognostic factors. Persistent disease after resection of T1 tumours has been observed in 33-55% of patients, and after resection of High-grade (HG) Ta tumour in 41,4%. It has been demonstrated that a second TURB can increase recurrence-free survival and it can make a restaging of the cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2016, 87 patients with superficial bladder tumor (Ta-T1), undergoing TURB and routine repeat TURB (Re-TURB) 4-6 weeks after the initial resection, were included in the study. Re-TURB was applied to the scar of the first resection and other suspicious lesions in the bladder. After the second-look, we studied the follow-up of each patient. RESULTS: Specimens obtained during the second TURBT showed no tumor in 47 (54,02%) patients; 40 (45,98%) patients had residual cancer: 34 of them had cancer of the same stage, 6 patients of pT1 had a lower stage, and 3 had a higher stage. 5 patient underwent radical cistectomy immediatly after re-TURBT. During the first year of follow up, 15 patients had a recurrent bladder cancer; 2 of them underwent radical cistectomy. CONCLUSIONS: T1 bladder cancer is an high risk tumor, so that second-look TURBT is a valuable procedure for accurate staging of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer and it can guarantee a better eradication of the neoplasm. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2020 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7569633/ /pubmed/32420968 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i2.8618 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Maltagliati, Matteo
Varca, Virginia
Milandri, Riccardo
Salvatore, Micali
Rocco, Bernardo Maria Cesare
Gregori, Andrea
Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center
title Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center
title_full Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center
title_fullStr Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center
title_full_unstemmed Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center
title_short Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center
title_sort second-look turbt: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420968
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i2.8618
work_keys_str_mv AT maltagliatimatteo secondlookturbtevaluationofanatomopatologicalandoncologicresultsinasinglecenter
AT varcavirginia secondlookturbtevaluationofanatomopatologicalandoncologicresultsinasinglecenter
AT milandririccardo secondlookturbtevaluationofanatomopatologicalandoncologicresultsinasinglecenter
AT salvatoremicali secondlookturbtevaluationofanatomopatologicalandoncologicresultsinasinglecenter
AT roccobernardomariacesare secondlookturbtevaluationofanatomopatologicalandoncologicresultsinasinglecenter
AT gregoriandrea secondlookturbtevaluationofanatomopatologicalandoncologicresultsinasinglecenter