Cargando…
Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center
INTRODUCTION: T1 bladder cancer is associated with a high risk of recurrence and progression; concomitant carcinoma in situ and/or multifocality are negative prognostic factors. Persistent disease after resection of T1 tumours has been observed in 33-55% of patients, and after resection of High-grad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mattioli 1885
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420968 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i2.8618 |
_version_ | 1783596769141063680 |
---|---|
author | Maltagliati, Matteo Varca, Virginia Milandri, Riccardo Salvatore, Micali Rocco, Bernardo Maria Cesare Gregori, Andrea |
author_facet | Maltagliati, Matteo Varca, Virginia Milandri, Riccardo Salvatore, Micali Rocco, Bernardo Maria Cesare Gregori, Andrea |
author_sort | Maltagliati, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: T1 bladder cancer is associated with a high risk of recurrence and progression; concomitant carcinoma in situ and/or multifocality are negative prognostic factors. Persistent disease after resection of T1 tumours has been observed in 33-55% of patients, and after resection of High-grade (HG) Ta tumour in 41,4%. It has been demonstrated that a second TURB can increase recurrence-free survival and it can make a restaging of the cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2016, 87 patients with superficial bladder tumor (Ta-T1), undergoing TURB and routine repeat TURB (Re-TURB) 4-6 weeks after the initial resection, were included in the study. Re-TURB was applied to the scar of the first resection and other suspicious lesions in the bladder. After the second-look, we studied the follow-up of each patient. RESULTS: Specimens obtained during the second TURBT showed no tumor in 47 (54,02%) patients; 40 (45,98%) patients had residual cancer: 34 of them had cancer of the same stage, 6 patients of pT1 had a lower stage, and 3 had a higher stage. 5 patient underwent radical cistectomy immediatly after re-TURBT. During the first year of follow up, 15 patients had a recurrent bladder cancer; 2 of them underwent radical cistectomy. CONCLUSIONS: T1 bladder cancer is an high risk tumor, so that second-look TURBT is a valuable procedure for accurate staging of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer and it can guarantee a better eradication of the neoplasm. (www.actabiomedica.it) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7569633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Mattioli 1885 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75696332020-10-21 Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center Maltagliati, Matteo Varca, Virginia Milandri, Riccardo Salvatore, Micali Rocco, Bernardo Maria Cesare Gregori, Andrea Acta Biomed Original Article INTRODUCTION: T1 bladder cancer is associated with a high risk of recurrence and progression; concomitant carcinoma in situ and/or multifocality are negative prognostic factors. Persistent disease after resection of T1 tumours has been observed in 33-55% of patients, and after resection of High-grade (HG) Ta tumour in 41,4%. It has been demonstrated that a second TURB can increase recurrence-free survival and it can make a restaging of the cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2016, 87 patients with superficial bladder tumor (Ta-T1), undergoing TURB and routine repeat TURB (Re-TURB) 4-6 weeks after the initial resection, were included in the study. Re-TURB was applied to the scar of the first resection and other suspicious lesions in the bladder. After the second-look, we studied the follow-up of each patient. RESULTS: Specimens obtained during the second TURBT showed no tumor in 47 (54,02%) patients; 40 (45,98%) patients had residual cancer: 34 of them had cancer of the same stage, 6 patients of pT1 had a lower stage, and 3 had a higher stage. 5 patient underwent radical cistectomy immediatly after re-TURBT. During the first year of follow up, 15 patients had a recurrent bladder cancer; 2 of them underwent radical cistectomy. CONCLUSIONS: T1 bladder cancer is an high risk tumor, so that second-look TURBT is a valuable procedure for accurate staging of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer and it can guarantee a better eradication of the neoplasm. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2020 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7569633/ /pubmed/32420968 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i2.8618 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Maltagliati, Matteo Varca, Virginia Milandri, Riccardo Salvatore, Micali Rocco, Bernardo Maria Cesare Gregori, Andrea Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center |
title | Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center |
title_full | Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center |
title_fullStr | Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center |
title_full_unstemmed | Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center |
title_short | Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center |
title_sort | second-look turbt: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420968 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i2.8618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maltagliatimatteo secondlookturbtevaluationofanatomopatologicalandoncologicresultsinasinglecenter AT varcavirginia secondlookturbtevaluationofanatomopatologicalandoncologicresultsinasinglecenter AT milandririccardo secondlookturbtevaluationofanatomopatologicalandoncologicresultsinasinglecenter AT salvatoremicali secondlookturbtevaluationofanatomopatologicalandoncologicresultsinasinglecenter AT roccobernardomariacesare secondlookturbtevaluationofanatomopatologicalandoncologicresultsinasinglecenter AT gregoriandrea secondlookturbtevaluationofanatomopatologicalandoncologicresultsinasinglecenter |