Cargando…

Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III)

INTRODUCTION: Proximal femoral (hip) fracture is common, serious and costly. Rehabilitation may improve functional recovery but evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are lacking. An enhanced rehabilitation intervention was previously developed and a feasibility study tested the methods us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Nefyn, Dodd, Susanna, Hardwick, Ben, Clayton, Dannii, Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor, Charles, Joanna Mary, Logan, Phillipa, Busse, Monica, Lewis, Ruth, Smith, Toby O, Sackley, Catherine, Morrison, Val, Lemmey, Andrew, Masterson-Algar, Patricia, Howard, Lola, Hennessy, Sophie, Soady, Claire, Ralph, Penelope, Dobson, Susan, Dorkenoo, Shanaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33067298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039791
_version_ 1783596832792772608
author Williams, Nefyn
Dodd, Susanna
Hardwick, Ben
Clayton, Dannii
Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
Charles, Joanna Mary
Logan, Phillipa
Busse, Monica
Lewis, Ruth
Smith, Toby O
Sackley, Catherine
Morrison, Val
Lemmey, Andrew
Masterson-Algar, Patricia
Howard, Lola
Hennessy, Sophie
Soady, Claire
Ralph, Penelope
Dobson, Susan
Dorkenoo, Shanaz
author_facet Williams, Nefyn
Dodd, Susanna
Hardwick, Ben
Clayton, Dannii
Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
Charles, Joanna Mary
Logan, Phillipa
Busse, Monica
Lewis, Ruth
Smith, Toby O
Sackley, Catherine
Morrison, Val
Lemmey, Andrew
Masterson-Algar, Patricia
Howard, Lola
Hennessy, Sophie
Soady, Claire
Ralph, Penelope
Dobson, Susan
Dorkenoo, Shanaz
author_sort Williams, Nefyn
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Proximal femoral (hip) fracture is common, serious and costly. Rehabilitation may improve functional recovery but evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are lacking. An enhanced rehabilitation intervention was previously developed and a feasibility study tested the methods used for this randomised controlled trial (RCT). The objectives are to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the enhanced rehabilitation programme following surgical repair of proximal femoral fracture in older people compared with usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Protocol for phase III, parallel-group, two-armed, superiority, pragmatic RCT with 1:1 allocation ratio; allocation sequence by minimisation programme with a built-in random element; secure web-based allocation concealment. The two treatments will be usual care (control) and usual care plus an enhanced rehabilitation programme (intervention). The enhanced rehabilitation will consist of a patient-held information workbook, goal setting diary and up to six additional therapy sessions. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be performed blind; patient and carer participants will be unblinded. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 17 and 52 weeks’ follow-up. Primary outcome at 52 weeks will be the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living scale. Secondary outcomes will measure anxiety and depression, health utility, cognitive status, hip pain intensity, falls self-efficacy, fear of falling, grip strength and physical function. Carer strain, anxiety and depression will be measured in carers. All safety events will be recorded, and serious adverse events will be assessed to determine whether they are related to the intervention and expected. Concurrent economic evaluation will be a cost-utility analysis from a health service and personal social care perspective. An embedded process evaluation will determine the mechanisms and processes that explain the implementation and impacts of the enhanced rehabilitation programme. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: National Health Service research ethics approval reference 18/NE/0300. Results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN28376407; Pre-results registered on 23 November 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7569930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75699302020-10-21 Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III) Williams, Nefyn Dodd, Susanna Hardwick, Ben Clayton, Dannii Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor Charles, Joanna Mary Logan, Phillipa Busse, Monica Lewis, Ruth Smith, Toby O Sackley, Catherine Morrison, Val Lemmey, Andrew Masterson-Algar, Patricia Howard, Lola Hennessy, Sophie Soady, Claire Ralph, Penelope Dobson, Susan Dorkenoo, Shanaz BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Proximal femoral (hip) fracture is common, serious and costly. Rehabilitation may improve functional recovery but evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are lacking. An enhanced rehabilitation intervention was previously developed and a feasibility study tested the methods used for this randomised controlled trial (RCT). The objectives are to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the enhanced rehabilitation programme following surgical repair of proximal femoral fracture in older people compared with usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Protocol for phase III, parallel-group, two-armed, superiority, pragmatic RCT with 1:1 allocation ratio; allocation sequence by minimisation programme with a built-in random element; secure web-based allocation concealment. The two treatments will be usual care (control) and usual care plus an enhanced rehabilitation programme (intervention). The enhanced rehabilitation will consist of a patient-held information workbook, goal setting diary and up to six additional therapy sessions. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be performed blind; patient and carer participants will be unblinded. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 17 and 52 weeks’ follow-up. Primary outcome at 52 weeks will be the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living scale. Secondary outcomes will measure anxiety and depression, health utility, cognitive status, hip pain intensity, falls self-efficacy, fear of falling, grip strength and physical function. Carer strain, anxiety and depression will be measured in carers. All safety events will be recorded, and serious adverse events will be assessed to determine whether they are related to the intervention and expected. Concurrent economic evaluation will be a cost-utility analysis from a health service and personal social care perspective. An embedded process evaluation will determine the mechanisms and processes that explain the implementation and impacts of the enhanced rehabilitation programme. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: National Health Service research ethics approval reference 18/NE/0300. Results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN28376407; Pre-results registered on 23 November 2018. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7569930/ /pubmed/33067298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039791 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Williams, Nefyn
Dodd, Susanna
Hardwick, Ben
Clayton, Dannii
Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
Charles, Joanna Mary
Logan, Phillipa
Busse, Monica
Lewis, Ruth
Smith, Toby O
Sackley, Catherine
Morrison, Val
Lemmey, Andrew
Masterson-Algar, Patricia
Howard, Lola
Hennessy, Sophie
Soady, Claire
Ralph, Penelope
Dobson, Susan
Dorkenoo, Shanaz
Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III)
title Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III)
title_full Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III)
title_fullStr Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III)
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III)
title_short Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III)
title_sort protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase iii (femur iii)
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33067298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039791
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsnefyn protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT doddsusanna protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT hardwickben protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT claytondannii protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT edwardsrhiannontudor protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT charlesjoannamary protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT loganphillipa protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT bussemonica protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT lewisruth protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT smithtobyo protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT sackleycatherine protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT morrisonval protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT lemmeyandrew protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT mastersonalgarpatricia protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT howardlola protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT hennessysophie protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT soadyclaire protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT ralphpenelope protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT dobsonsusan protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii
AT dorkenooshanaz protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii