Cargando…
Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III)
INTRODUCTION: Proximal femoral (hip) fracture is common, serious and costly. Rehabilitation may improve functional recovery but evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are lacking. An enhanced rehabilitation intervention was previously developed and a feasibility study tested the methods us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33067298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039791 |
_version_ | 1783596832792772608 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Nefyn Dodd, Susanna Hardwick, Ben Clayton, Dannii Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor Charles, Joanna Mary Logan, Phillipa Busse, Monica Lewis, Ruth Smith, Toby O Sackley, Catherine Morrison, Val Lemmey, Andrew Masterson-Algar, Patricia Howard, Lola Hennessy, Sophie Soady, Claire Ralph, Penelope Dobson, Susan Dorkenoo, Shanaz |
author_facet | Williams, Nefyn Dodd, Susanna Hardwick, Ben Clayton, Dannii Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor Charles, Joanna Mary Logan, Phillipa Busse, Monica Lewis, Ruth Smith, Toby O Sackley, Catherine Morrison, Val Lemmey, Andrew Masterson-Algar, Patricia Howard, Lola Hennessy, Sophie Soady, Claire Ralph, Penelope Dobson, Susan Dorkenoo, Shanaz |
author_sort | Williams, Nefyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Proximal femoral (hip) fracture is common, serious and costly. Rehabilitation may improve functional recovery but evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are lacking. An enhanced rehabilitation intervention was previously developed and a feasibility study tested the methods used for this randomised controlled trial (RCT). The objectives are to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the enhanced rehabilitation programme following surgical repair of proximal femoral fracture in older people compared with usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Protocol for phase III, parallel-group, two-armed, superiority, pragmatic RCT with 1:1 allocation ratio; allocation sequence by minimisation programme with a built-in random element; secure web-based allocation concealment. The two treatments will be usual care (control) and usual care plus an enhanced rehabilitation programme (intervention). The enhanced rehabilitation will consist of a patient-held information workbook, goal setting diary and up to six additional therapy sessions. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be performed blind; patient and carer participants will be unblinded. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 17 and 52 weeks’ follow-up. Primary outcome at 52 weeks will be the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living scale. Secondary outcomes will measure anxiety and depression, health utility, cognitive status, hip pain intensity, falls self-efficacy, fear of falling, grip strength and physical function. Carer strain, anxiety and depression will be measured in carers. All safety events will be recorded, and serious adverse events will be assessed to determine whether they are related to the intervention and expected. Concurrent economic evaluation will be a cost-utility analysis from a health service and personal social care perspective. An embedded process evaluation will determine the mechanisms and processes that explain the implementation and impacts of the enhanced rehabilitation programme. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: National Health Service research ethics approval reference 18/NE/0300. Results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN28376407; Pre-results registered on 23 November 2018. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7569930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75699302020-10-21 Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III) Williams, Nefyn Dodd, Susanna Hardwick, Ben Clayton, Dannii Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor Charles, Joanna Mary Logan, Phillipa Busse, Monica Lewis, Ruth Smith, Toby O Sackley, Catherine Morrison, Val Lemmey, Andrew Masterson-Algar, Patricia Howard, Lola Hennessy, Sophie Soady, Claire Ralph, Penelope Dobson, Susan Dorkenoo, Shanaz BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Proximal femoral (hip) fracture is common, serious and costly. Rehabilitation may improve functional recovery but evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are lacking. An enhanced rehabilitation intervention was previously developed and a feasibility study tested the methods used for this randomised controlled trial (RCT). The objectives are to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the enhanced rehabilitation programme following surgical repair of proximal femoral fracture in older people compared with usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Protocol for phase III, parallel-group, two-armed, superiority, pragmatic RCT with 1:1 allocation ratio; allocation sequence by minimisation programme with a built-in random element; secure web-based allocation concealment. The two treatments will be usual care (control) and usual care plus an enhanced rehabilitation programme (intervention). The enhanced rehabilitation will consist of a patient-held information workbook, goal setting diary and up to six additional therapy sessions. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be performed blind; patient and carer participants will be unblinded. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 17 and 52 weeks’ follow-up. Primary outcome at 52 weeks will be the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living scale. Secondary outcomes will measure anxiety and depression, health utility, cognitive status, hip pain intensity, falls self-efficacy, fear of falling, grip strength and physical function. Carer strain, anxiety and depression will be measured in carers. All safety events will be recorded, and serious adverse events will be assessed to determine whether they are related to the intervention and expected. Concurrent economic evaluation will be a cost-utility analysis from a health service and personal social care perspective. An embedded process evaluation will determine the mechanisms and processes that explain the implementation and impacts of the enhanced rehabilitation programme. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: National Health Service research ethics approval reference 18/NE/0300. Results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN28376407; Pre-results registered on 23 November 2018. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7569930/ /pubmed/33067298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039791 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Williams, Nefyn Dodd, Susanna Hardwick, Ben Clayton, Dannii Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor Charles, Joanna Mary Logan, Phillipa Busse, Monica Lewis, Ruth Smith, Toby O Sackley, Catherine Morrison, Val Lemmey, Andrew Masterson-Algar, Patricia Howard, Lola Hennessy, Sophie Soady, Claire Ralph, Penelope Dobson, Susan Dorkenoo, Shanaz Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III) |
title | Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III) |
title_full | Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III) |
title_fullStr | Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III) |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III) |
title_short | Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III) |
title_sort | protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase iii (femur iii) |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33067298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039791 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamsnefyn protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT doddsusanna protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT hardwickben protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT claytondannii protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT edwardsrhiannontudor protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT charlesjoannamary protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT loganphillipa protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT bussemonica protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT lewisruth protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT smithtobyo protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT sackleycatherine protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT morrisonval protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT lemmeyandrew protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT mastersonalgarpatricia protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT howardlola protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT hennessysophie protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT soadyclaire protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT ralphpenelope protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT dobsonsusan protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii AT dorkenooshanaz protocolforadefinitiverandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofacommunitybasedrehabilitationprogrammefollowinghipfracturefractureintheelderlymultidisciplinaryrehabilitationphaseiiifemuriii |