Cargando…
Russet Susceptibility in Apple Is Associated with Skin Cells that Are Larger, More Variable in Size, and of Reduced Fracture Strain
Russeting is an economically important surface disorder in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh). Indirect evidence suggests an irregular skin structure may be the cause of the phenomenon. The objective of this study was to characterize epidermal and hypodermal cell morphology and the mechanical propertie...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7570070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32872488 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9091118 |
_version_ | 1783596864809992192 |
---|---|
author | Khanal, Bishnu P. Le, Thi Lieu Si, Yiru Knoche, Moritz |
author_facet | Khanal, Bishnu P. Le, Thi Lieu Si, Yiru Knoche, Moritz |
author_sort | Khanal, Bishnu P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Russeting is an economically important surface disorder in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh). Indirect evidence suggests an irregular skin structure may be the cause of the phenomenon. The objective of this study was to characterize epidermal and hypodermal cell morphology and the mechanical properties of the skins of apple cultivars of differing russet susceptibility. Dimensions of epidermal and hypodermal cells were determined using microscopy. Stiffness (S), maximum force ([Formula: see text]), and maximum strain ([Formula: see text]) at failure were quantified using uniaxial tensile tests of skin strips. Particularly during early fruit development, epidermal cells (EC) and hypodermal cells (HC) in russet non-susceptible cultivars occurred in greater numbers per unit area than in russet-susceptible ones. The EC and HC were lower in height, shorter in length, and of reduced tangential surface area. There were little differences in S or [Formula: see text] between non-susceptible and susceptible cultivars. However, the [Formula: see text] were higher for the skins of non-susceptible cultivars, than for those of susceptible ones. This difference was larger for the young than for the later growth stages. It is concluded that russet-susceptible cultivars generally have larger cells and a wider distribution of cell sizes for both EC and HC. These result in decreased [Formula: see text] for the skin during early fruit development when russet susceptibility is high. This increases the chances of skin failures which is known to trigger russeting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7570070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75700702020-10-29 Russet Susceptibility in Apple Is Associated with Skin Cells that Are Larger, More Variable in Size, and of Reduced Fracture Strain Khanal, Bishnu P. Le, Thi Lieu Si, Yiru Knoche, Moritz Plants (Basel) Article Russeting is an economically important surface disorder in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh). Indirect evidence suggests an irregular skin structure may be the cause of the phenomenon. The objective of this study was to characterize epidermal and hypodermal cell morphology and the mechanical properties of the skins of apple cultivars of differing russet susceptibility. Dimensions of epidermal and hypodermal cells were determined using microscopy. Stiffness (S), maximum force ([Formula: see text]), and maximum strain ([Formula: see text]) at failure were quantified using uniaxial tensile tests of skin strips. Particularly during early fruit development, epidermal cells (EC) and hypodermal cells (HC) in russet non-susceptible cultivars occurred in greater numbers per unit area than in russet-susceptible ones. The EC and HC were lower in height, shorter in length, and of reduced tangential surface area. There were little differences in S or [Formula: see text] between non-susceptible and susceptible cultivars. However, the [Formula: see text] were higher for the skins of non-susceptible cultivars, than for those of susceptible ones. This difference was larger for the young than for the later growth stages. It is concluded that russet-susceptible cultivars generally have larger cells and a wider distribution of cell sizes for both EC and HC. These result in decreased [Formula: see text] for the skin during early fruit development when russet susceptibility is high. This increases the chances of skin failures which is known to trigger russeting. MDPI 2020-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7570070/ /pubmed/32872488 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9091118 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Khanal, Bishnu P. Le, Thi Lieu Si, Yiru Knoche, Moritz Russet Susceptibility in Apple Is Associated with Skin Cells that Are Larger, More Variable in Size, and of Reduced Fracture Strain |
title | Russet Susceptibility in Apple Is Associated with Skin Cells that Are Larger, More Variable in Size, and of Reduced Fracture Strain |
title_full | Russet Susceptibility in Apple Is Associated with Skin Cells that Are Larger, More Variable in Size, and of Reduced Fracture Strain |
title_fullStr | Russet Susceptibility in Apple Is Associated with Skin Cells that Are Larger, More Variable in Size, and of Reduced Fracture Strain |
title_full_unstemmed | Russet Susceptibility in Apple Is Associated with Skin Cells that Are Larger, More Variable in Size, and of Reduced Fracture Strain |
title_short | Russet Susceptibility in Apple Is Associated with Skin Cells that Are Larger, More Variable in Size, and of Reduced Fracture Strain |
title_sort | russet susceptibility in apple is associated with skin cells that are larger, more variable in size, and of reduced fracture strain |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7570070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32872488 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9091118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanalbishnup russetsusceptibilityinappleisassociatedwithskincellsthatarelargermorevariableinsizeandofreducedfracturestrain AT lethilieu russetsusceptibilityinappleisassociatedwithskincellsthatarelargermorevariableinsizeandofreducedfracturestrain AT siyiru russetsusceptibilityinappleisassociatedwithskincellsthatarelargermorevariableinsizeandofreducedfracturestrain AT knochemoritz russetsusceptibilityinappleisassociatedwithskincellsthatarelargermorevariableinsizeandofreducedfracturestrain |