Cargando…

Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements

Collecting remotely sensed spectral data under varying ambient light conditions is challenging. The objective of this study was to test the ability to classify grayscale targets observed by portable spectrometers under varying ambient light conditions. Two sets of spectrometers covering ultraviolet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamidisepehr, Ali, Sama, Michael P., Dvorak, Joseph S., Wendroth, Ole O., Montross, Michael D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7570991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961754
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20185375
_version_ 1783597073902338048
author Hamidisepehr, Ali
Sama, Michael P.
Dvorak, Joseph S.
Wendroth, Ole O.
Montross, Michael D.
author_facet Hamidisepehr, Ali
Sama, Michael P.
Dvorak, Joseph S.
Wendroth, Ole O.
Montross, Michael D.
author_sort Hamidisepehr, Ali
collection PubMed
description Collecting remotely sensed spectral data under varying ambient light conditions is challenging. The objective of this study was to test the ability to classify grayscale targets observed by portable spectrometers under varying ambient light conditions. Two sets of spectrometers covering ultraviolet (UV), visible (VIS), and near−infrared (NIR) wavelengths were instrumented using an embedded computer. One set was uncalibrated and used to measure the raw intensity of light reflected from a target. The other set was calibrated and used to measure downwelling irradiance. Three ambient−light compensation methods that successively built upon each other were investigated. The default method used a variable integration time that was determined based on a previous measurement to maximize intensity of the spectral signature (M1). The next method divided the spectral signature by the integration time to normalize the spectrum and reveal relative differences in ambient light intensity (M2). The third method divided the normalized spectrum by the ambient light spectrum on a wavelength basis (M3). Spectral data were classified using a two−step process. First, raw spectral data were preprocessed using a partial least squares (PLS) regression method to compress highly correlated wavelengths and to avoid overfitting. Next, an ensemble of machine learning algorithms was trained, validated, and tested to determine the overall classification accuracy of each algorithm. Results showed that simply maximizing sensitivity led to the best prediction accuracy when classifying known targets. Average prediction accuracy across all spectrometers and compensation methods exceeded 93%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7570991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75709912020-10-28 Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements Hamidisepehr, Ali Sama, Michael P. Dvorak, Joseph S. Wendroth, Ole O. Montross, Michael D. Sensors (Basel) Article Collecting remotely sensed spectral data under varying ambient light conditions is challenging. The objective of this study was to test the ability to classify grayscale targets observed by portable spectrometers under varying ambient light conditions. Two sets of spectrometers covering ultraviolet (UV), visible (VIS), and near−infrared (NIR) wavelengths were instrumented using an embedded computer. One set was uncalibrated and used to measure the raw intensity of light reflected from a target. The other set was calibrated and used to measure downwelling irradiance. Three ambient−light compensation methods that successively built upon each other were investigated. The default method used a variable integration time that was determined based on a previous measurement to maximize intensity of the spectral signature (M1). The next method divided the spectral signature by the integration time to normalize the spectrum and reveal relative differences in ambient light intensity (M2). The third method divided the normalized spectrum by the ambient light spectrum on a wavelength basis (M3). Spectral data were classified using a two−step process. First, raw spectral data were preprocessed using a partial least squares (PLS) regression method to compress highly correlated wavelengths and to avoid overfitting. Next, an ensemble of machine learning algorithms was trained, validated, and tested to determine the overall classification accuracy of each algorithm. Results showed that simply maximizing sensitivity led to the best prediction accuracy when classifying known targets. Average prediction accuracy across all spectrometers and compensation methods exceeded 93%. MDPI 2020-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7570991/ /pubmed/32961754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20185375 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hamidisepehr, Ali
Sama, Michael P.
Dvorak, Joseph S.
Wendroth, Ole O.
Montross, Michael D.
Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements
title Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements
title_full Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements
title_fullStr Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements
title_short Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements
title_sort classifying reflectance targets under ambient light conditions using passive spectral measurements
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7570991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961754
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20185375
work_keys_str_mv AT hamidisepehrali classifyingreflectancetargetsunderambientlightconditionsusingpassivespectralmeasurements
AT samamichaelp classifyingreflectancetargetsunderambientlightconditionsusingpassivespectralmeasurements
AT dvorakjosephs classifyingreflectancetargetsunderambientlightconditionsusingpassivespectralmeasurements
AT wendrotholeo classifyingreflectancetargetsunderambientlightconditionsusingpassivespectralmeasurements
AT montrossmichaeld classifyingreflectancetargetsunderambientlightconditionsusingpassivespectralmeasurements