Cargando…
Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements
Collecting remotely sensed spectral data under varying ambient light conditions is challenging. The objective of this study was to test the ability to classify grayscale targets observed by portable spectrometers under varying ambient light conditions. Two sets of spectrometers covering ultraviolet...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7570991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20185375 |
_version_ | 1783597073902338048 |
---|---|
author | Hamidisepehr, Ali Sama, Michael P. Dvorak, Joseph S. Wendroth, Ole O. Montross, Michael D. |
author_facet | Hamidisepehr, Ali Sama, Michael P. Dvorak, Joseph S. Wendroth, Ole O. Montross, Michael D. |
author_sort | Hamidisepehr, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | Collecting remotely sensed spectral data under varying ambient light conditions is challenging. The objective of this study was to test the ability to classify grayscale targets observed by portable spectrometers under varying ambient light conditions. Two sets of spectrometers covering ultraviolet (UV), visible (VIS), and near−infrared (NIR) wavelengths were instrumented using an embedded computer. One set was uncalibrated and used to measure the raw intensity of light reflected from a target. The other set was calibrated and used to measure downwelling irradiance. Three ambient−light compensation methods that successively built upon each other were investigated. The default method used a variable integration time that was determined based on a previous measurement to maximize intensity of the spectral signature (M1). The next method divided the spectral signature by the integration time to normalize the spectrum and reveal relative differences in ambient light intensity (M2). The third method divided the normalized spectrum by the ambient light spectrum on a wavelength basis (M3). Spectral data were classified using a two−step process. First, raw spectral data were preprocessed using a partial least squares (PLS) regression method to compress highly correlated wavelengths and to avoid overfitting. Next, an ensemble of machine learning algorithms was trained, validated, and tested to determine the overall classification accuracy of each algorithm. Results showed that simply maximizing sensitivity led to the best prediction accuracy when classifying known targets. Average prediction accuracy across all spectrometers and compensation methods exceeded 93%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7570991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75709912020-10-28 Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements Hamidisepehr, Ali Sama, Michael P. Dvorak, Joseph S. Wendroth, Ole O. Montross, Michael D. Sensors (Basel) Article Collecting remotely sensed spectral data under varying ambient light conditions is challenging. The objective of this study was to test the ability to classify grayscale targets observed by portable spectrometers under varying ambient light conditions. Two sets of spectrometers covering ultraviolet (UV), visible (VIS), and near−infrared (NIR) wavelengths were instrumented using an embedded computer. One set was uncalibrated and used to measure the raw intensity of light reflected from a target. The other set was calibrated and used to measure downwelling irradiance. Three ambient−light compensation methods that successively built upon each other were investigated. The default method used a variable integration time that was determined based on a previous measurement to maximize intensity of the spectral signature (M1). The next method divided the spectral signature by the integration time to normalize the spectrum and reveal relative differences in ambient light intensity (M2). The third method divided the normalized spectrum by the ambient light spectrum on a wavelength basis (M3). Spectral data were classified using a two−step process. First, raw spectral data were preprocessed using a partial least squares (PLS) regression method to compress highly correlated wavelengths and to avoid overfitting. Next, an ensemble of machine learning algorithms was trained, validated, and tested to determine the overall classification accuracy of each algorithm. Results showed that simply maximizing sensitivity led to the best prediction accuracy when classifying known targets. Average prediction accuracy across all spectrometers and compensation methods exceeded 93%. MDPI 2020-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7570991/ /pubmed/32961754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20185375 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hamidisepehr, Ali Sama, Michael P. Dvorak, Joseph S. Wendroth, Ole O. Montross, Michael D. Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements |
title | Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements |
title_full | Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements |
title_fullStr | Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements |
title_short | Classifying Reflectance Targets under Ambient Light Conditions Using Passive Spectral Measurements |
title_sort | classifying reflectance targets under ambient light conditions using passive spectral measurements |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7570991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20185375 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamidisepehrali classifyingreflectancetargetsunderambientlightconditionsusingpassivespectralmeasurements AT samamichaelp classifyingreflectancetargetsunderambientlightconditionsusingpassivespectralmeasurements AT dvorakjosephs classifyingreflectancetargetsunderambientlightconditionsusingpassivespectralmeasurements AT wendrotholeo classifyingreflectancetargetsunderambientlightconditionsusingpassivespectralmeasurements AT montrossmichaeld classifyingreflectancetargetsunderambientlightconditionsusingpassivespectralmeasurements |