Cargando…
GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study
The sealers used for root canal treatment should be biocompatible for the peri-radicular tissues, to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of GuttaFlow(®) bioseal sealer and to compare them with AH26(®) epoxy resin. Culture media were conditioned with the GuttaFlow(®) bioseal and AH26(®) pellets. MDPC-23 o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961683 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184297 |
_version_ | 1783597077158166528 |
---|---|
author | Ferreira, Inês Laranjo, Mafalda Marto, Carlos Miguel Casalta-Lopes, João Serambeque, Beatriz Gonçalves, Ana Cristina Sarmento-Ribeiro, Ana Bela Carrilho, Eunice Botelho, Maria Filomena Baptista Paula, Anabela Marques Ferreira, Manuel |
author_facet | Ferreira, Inês Laranjo, Mafalda Marto, Carlos Miguel Casalta-Lopes, João Serambeque, Beatriz Gonçalves, Ana Cristina Sarmento-Ribeiro, Ana Bela Carrilho, Eunice Botelho, Maria Filomena Baptista Paula, Anabela Marques Ferreira, Manuel |
author_sort | Ferreira, Inês |
collection | PubMed |
description | The sealers used for root canal treatment should be biocompatible for the peri-radicular tissues, to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of GuttaFlow(®) bioseal sealer and to compare them with AH26(®) epoxy resin. Culture media were conditioned with the GuttaFlow(®) bioseal and AH26(®) pellets. MDPC-23 odontoblast cell cultures were treated with conditioned medium and serial dilutions. To evaluate the metabolic activity and cellular viability, the MTT and SRB assays were performed. To determine the production of reactive oxygen species, the DHE and DCF-DA probes were used. Cell cycle and cell-death types were assessed by cytometry, and to evaluate the mineralization capacity, the Alizarin Red S coloration was used. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) when normality was found and Kruskal-Wallis on the opposite case. For the comparison with normality values, the Student t-test was used. Cells exposed to the GuttaFlow(®) bioseal conditioned medium maintained high metabolic activities, except at higher concentrations. Likewise, viability was maintained, but a significant decrease was observed after exposure to the highest concentration (p < 0.001), associated with cell death by late apoptosis and necrosis. When cell cultures were exposed to AH26(®), metabolic activity was highly compromised, resulting in cell death. An imbalance in the production of peroxides and superoxide anion was observed. GuttaFlow(®) bioseal showed higher biocompatibility than AH26(®). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7571006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75710062020-10-28 GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study Ferreira, Inês Laranjo, Mafalda Marto, Carlos Miguel Casalta-Lopes, João Serambeque, Beatriz Gonçalves, Ana Cristina Sarmento-Ribeiro, Ana Bela Carrilho, Eunice Botelho, Maria Filomena Baptista Paula, Anabela Marques Ferreira, Manuel Molecules Article The sealers used for root canal treatment should be biocompatible for the peri-radicular tissues, to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of GuttaFlow(®) bioseal sealer and to compare them with AH26(®) epoxy resin. Culture media were conditioned with the GuttaFlow(®) bioseal and AH26(®) pellets. MDPC-23 odontoblast cell cultures were treated with conditioned medium and serial dilutions. To evaluate the metabolic activity and cellular viability, the MTT and SRB assays were performed. To determine the production of reactive oxygen species, the DHE and DCF-DA probes were used. Cell cycle and cell-death types were assessed by cytometry, and to evaluate the mineralization capacity, the Alizarin Red S coloration was used. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) when normality was found and Kruskal-Wallis on the opposite case. For the comparison with normality values, the Student t-test was used. Cells exposed to the GuttaFlow(®) bioseal conditioned medium maintained high metabolic activities, except at higher concentrations. Likewise, viability was maintained, but a significant decrease was observed after exposure to the highest concentration (p < 0.001), associated with cell death by late apoptosis and necrosis. When cell cultures were exposed to AH26(®), metabolic activity was highly compromised, resulting in cell death. An imbalance in the production of peroxides and superoxide anion was observed. GuttaFlow(®) bioseal showed higher biocompatibility than AH26(®). MDPI 2020-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7571006/ /pubmed/32961683 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184297 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ferreira, Inês Laranjo, Mafalda Marto, Carlos Miguel Casalta-Lopes, João Serambeque, Beatriz Gonçalves, Ana Cristina Sarmento-Ribeiro, Ana Bela Carrilho, Eunice Botelho, Maria Filomena Baptista Paula, Anabela Marques Ferreira, Manuel GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study |
title | GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study |
title_full | GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study |
title_short | GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study |
title_sort | guttaflow(®) bioseal cytotoxicity assessment: in vitro study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961683 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184297 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferreiraines guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy AT laranjomafalda guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy AT martocarlosmiguel guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy AT casaltalopesjoao guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy AT serambequebeatriz guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy AT goncalvesanacristina guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy AT sarmentoribeiroanabela guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy AT carrilhoeunice guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy AT botelhomariafilomena guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy AT baptistapaulaanabela guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy AT marquesferreiramanuel guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy |