Cargando…

GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study

The sealers used for root canal treatment should be biocompatible for the peri-radicular tissues, to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of GuttaFlow(®) bioseal sealer and to compare them with AH26(®) epoxy resin. Culture media were conditioned with the GuttaFlow(®) bioseal and AH26(®) pellets. MDPC-23 o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferreira, Inês, Laranjo, Mafalda, Marto, Carlos Miguel, Casalta-Lopes, João, Serambeque, Beatriz, Gonçalves, Ana Cristina, Sarmento-Ribeiro, Ana Bela, Carrilho, Eunice, Botelho, Maria Filomena, Baptista Paula, Anabela, Marques Ferreira, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961683
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184297
_version_ 1783597077158166528
author Ferreira, Inês
Laranjo, Mafalda
Marto, Carlos Miguel
Casalta-Lopes, João
Serambeque, Beatriz
Gonçalves, Ana Cristina
Sarmento-Ribeiro, Ana Bela
Carrilho, Eunice
Botelho, Maria Filomena
Baptista Paula, Anabela
Marques Ferreira, Manuel
author_facet Ferreira, Inês
Laranjo, Mafalda
Marto, Carlos Miguel
Casalta-Lopes, João
Serambeque, Beatriz
Gonçalves, Ana Cristina
Sarmento-Ribeiro, Ana Bela
Carrilho, Eunice
Botelho, Maria Filomena
Baptista Paula, Anabela
Marques Ferreira, Manuel
author_sort Ferreira, Inês
collection PubMed
description The sealers used for root canal treatment should be biocompatible for the peri-radicular tissues, to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of GuttaFlow(®) bioseal sealer and to compare them with AH26(®) epoxy resin. Culture media were conditioned with the GuttaFlow(®) bioseal and AH26(®) pellets. MDPC-23 odontoblast cell cultures were treated with conditioned medium and serial dilutions. To evaluate the metabolic activity and cellular viability, the MTT and SRB assays were performed. To determine the production of reactive oxygen species, the DHE and DCF-DA probes were used. Cell cycle and cell-death types were assessed by cytometry, and to evaluate the mineralization capacity, the Alizarin Red S coloration was used. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) when normality was found and Kruskal-Wallis on the opposite case. For the comparison with normality values, the Student t-test was used. Cells exposed to the GuttaFlow(®) bioseal conditioned medium maintained high metabolic activities, except at higher concentrations. Likewise, viability was maintained, but a significant decrease was observed after exposure to the highest concentration (p < 0.001), associated with cell death by late apoptosis and necrosis. When cell cultures were exposed to AH26(®), metabolic activity was highly compromised, resulting in cell death. An imbalance in the production of peroxides and superoxide anion was observed. GuttaFlow(®) bioseal showed higher biocompatibility than AH26(®).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7571006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75710062020-10-28 GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study Ferreira, Inês Laranjo, Mafalda Marto, Carlos Miguel Casalta-Lopes, João Serambeque, Beatriz Gonçalves, Ana Cristina Sarmento-Ribeiro, Ana Bela Carrilho, Eunice Botelho, Maria Filomena Baptista Paula, Anabela Marques Ferreira, Manuel Molecules Article The sealers used for root canal treatment should be biocompatible for the peri-radicular tissues, to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of GuttaFlow(®) bioseal sealer and to compare them with AH26(®) epoxy resin. Culture media were conditioned with the GuttaFlow(®) bioseal and AH26(®) pellets. MDPC-23 odontoblast cell cultures were treated with conditioned medium and serial dilutions. To evaluate the metabolic activity and cellular viability, the MTT and SRB assays were performed. To determine the production of reactive oxygen species, the DHE and DCF-DA probes were used. Cell cycle and cell-death types were assessed by cytometry, and to evaluate the mineralization capacity, the Alizarin Red S coloration was used. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) when normality was found and Kruskal-Wallis on the opposite case. For the comparison with normality values, the Student t-test was used. Cells exposed to the GuttaFlow(®) bioseal conditioned medium maintained high metabolic activities, except at higher concentrations. Likewise, viability was maintained, but a significant decrease was observed after exposure to the highest concentration (p < 0.001), associated with cell death by late apoptosis and necrosis. When cell cultures were exposed to AH26(®), metabolic activity was highly compromised, resulting in cell death. An imbalance in the production of peroxides and superoxide anion was observed. GuttaFlow(®) bioseal showed higher biocompatibility than AH26(®). MDPI 2020-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7571006/ /pubmed/32961683 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184297 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ferreira, Inês
Laranjo, Mafalda
Marto, Carlos Miguel
Casalta-Lopes, João
Serambeque, Beatriz
Gonçalves, Ana Cristina
Sarmento-Ribeiro, Ana Bela
Carrilho, Eunice
Botelho, Maria Filomena
Baptista Paula, Anabela
Marques Ferreira, Manuel
GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study
title GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study
title_full GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study
title_fullStr GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study
title_short GuttaFlow(®) Bioseal Cytotoxicity Assessment: In Vitro Study
title_sort guttaflow(®) bioseal cytotoxicity assessment: in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961683
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184297
work_keys_str_mv AT ferreiraines guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy
AT laranjomafalda guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy
AT martocarlosmiguel guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy
AT casaltalopesjoao guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy
AT serambequebeatriz guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy
AT goncalvesanacristina guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy
AT sarmentoribeiroanabela guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy
AT carrilhoeunice guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy
AT botelhomariafilomena guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy
AT baptistapaulaanabela guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy
AT marquesferreiramanuel guttaflowbiosealcytotoxicityassessmentinvitrostudy