Cargando…

Impact of the Transition from ICD–9–CM to ICD–10–CM on the Identification of Pregnancy Episodes in US Health Insurance Claims Data

BACKGROUND: Before October 2015, pregnancy cohorts assembled from US health insurance claims have relied on medical encounters with International Classification of Diseases-ninth revision-clinical modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. We aimed to extend existing pregnancy identification algorithms into the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarayani, Amir, Wang, Xi, Thai, Thuy Nhu, Albogami, Yasser, Jeon, Nakyung, Winterstein, Almut G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116906
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S269400
_version_ 1783597196400132096
author Sarayani, Amir
Wang, Xi
Thai, Thuy Nhu
Albogami, Yasser
Jeon, Nakyung
Winterstein, Almut G
author_facet Sarayani, Amir
Wang, Xi
Thai, Thuy Nhu
Albogami, Yasser
Jeon, Nakyung
Winterstein, Almut G
author_sort Sarayani, Amir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Before October 2015, pregnancy cohorts assembled from US health insurance claims have relied on medical encounters with International Classification of Diseases-ninth revision-clinical modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. We aimed to extend existing pregnancy identification algorithms into the ICD-10-CM era and evaluate performance. METHODS: We used national private insurance claims data (2005–2018) to develop and test a pregnancy identification algorithm. We considered validated ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes that identify medical encounters for live birth, stillbirth, ectopic pregnancy, abortions, and prenatal screening to identify pregnancies. We then mapped these codes to the ICD-10-CM system using general equivalent mapping tools and reconciled outputs with literature and expert opinion. Both versions were applied to the respective coding period to identify pregnancies. We required 45 weeks of health plan enrollment from estimated conception to ensure the capture of all pregnancy endpoints. RESULTS: We identified 7,060,675 pregnancy episodes, of which 50.1% met insurance enrollment requirements. Live-born deliveries comprised the majority (76.5%) of episodes, followed by abortions (20.3%). The annual prevalence for all pregnancy types was stable across the ICD transition period except for postterm pregnancies, which increased from 0.5% to 3.4%. We observed that ICD codes indicating gestational age were available for 86.8% of live-born deliveries in the ICD-10 era compared to 23.5% in the ICD-9 era. Patterns of prenatal tests remained stable across the transition period. CONCLUSION: Translation of existing ICD-9-CM pregnancy algorithms into ICD-10-CM codes provided reasonable consistency in identifying pregnancy episodes across the ICD transition period. New codes for gestational age can potentially improve the precision of conception estimates and minimize measurement biases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7571578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75715782020-10-27 Impact of the Transition from ICD–9–CM to ICD–10–CM on the Identification of Pregnancy Episodes in US Health Insurance Claims Data Sarayani, Amir Wang, Xi Thai, Thuy Nhu Albogami, Yasser Jeon, Nakyung Winterstein, Almut G Clin Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: Before October 2015, pregnancy cohorts assembled from US health insurance claims have relied on medical encounters with International Classification of Diseases-ninth revision-clinical modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. We aimed to extend existing pregnancy identification algorithms into the ICD-10-CM era and evaluate performance. METHODS: We used national private insurance claims data (2005–2018) to develop and test a pregnancy identification algorithm. We considered validated ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes that identify medical encounters for live birth, stillbirth, ectopic pregnancy, abortions, and prenatal screening to identify pregnancies. We then mapped these codes to the ICD-10-CM system using general equivalent mapping tools and reconciled outputs with literature and expert opinion. Both versions were applied to the respective coding period to identify pregnancies. We required 45 weeks of health plan enrollment from estimated conception to ensure the capture of all pregnancy endpoints. RESULTS: We identified 7,060,675 pregnancy episodes, of which 50.1% met insurance enrollment requirements. Live-born deliveries comprised the majority (76.5%) of episodes, followed by abortions (20.3%). The annual prevalence for all pregnancy types was stable across the ICD transition period except for postterm pregnancies, which increased from 0.5% to 3.4%. We observed that ICD codes indicating gestational age were available for 86.8% of live-born deliveries in the ICD-10 era compared to 23.5% in the ICD-9 era. Patterns of prenatal tests remained stable across the transition period. CONCLUSION: Translation of existing ICD-9-CM pregnancy algorithms into ICD-10-CM codes provided reasonable consistency in identifying pregnancy episodes across the ICD transition period. New codes for gestational age can potentially improve the precision of conception estimates and minimize measurement biases. Dove 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7571578/ /pubmed/33116906 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S269400 Text en © 2020 Sarayani et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Sarayani, Amir
Wang, Xi
Thai, Thuy Nhu
Albogami, Yasser
Jeon, Nakyung
Winterstein, Almut G
Impact of the Transition from ICD–9–CM to ICD–10–CM on the Identification of Pregnancy Episodes in US Health Insurance Claims Data
title Impact of the Transition from ICD–9–CM to ICD–10–CM on the Identification of Pregnancy Episodes in US Health Insurance Claims Data
title_full Impact of the Transition from ICD–9–CM to ICD–10–CM on the Identification of Pregnancy Episodes in US Health Insurance Claims Data
title_fullStr Impact of the Transition from ICD–9–CM to ICD–10–CM on the Identification of Pregnancy Episodes in US Health Insurance Claims Data
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the Transition from ICD–9–CM to ICD–10–CM on the Identification of Pregnancy Episodes in US Health Insurance Claims Data
title_short Impact of the Transition from ICD–9–CM to ICD–10–CM on the Identification of Pregnancy Episodes in US Health Insurance Claims Data
title_sort impact of the transition from icd–9–cm to icd–10–cm on the identification of pregnancy episodes in us health insurance claims data
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116906
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S269400
work_keys_str_mv AT sarayaniamir impactofthetransitionfromicd9cmtoicd10cmontheidentificationofpregnancyepisodesinushealthinsuranceclaimsdata
AT wangxi impactofthetransitionfromicd9cmtoicd10cmontheidentificationofpregnancyepisodesinushealthinsuranceclaimsdata
AT thaithuynhu impactofthetransitionfromicd9cmtoicd10cmontheidentificationofpregnancyepisodesinushealthinsuranceclaimsdata
AT albogamiyasser impactofthetransitionfromicd9cmtoicd10cmontheidentificationofpregnancyepisodesinushealthinsuranceclaimsdata
AT jeonnakyung impactofthetransitionfromicd9cmtoicd10cmontheidentificationofpregnancyepisodesinushealthinsuranceclaimsdata
AT wintersteinalmutg impactofthetransitionfromicd9cmtoicd10cmontheidentificationofpregnancyepisodesinushealthinsuranceclaimsdata