Cargando…
Comparison of Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection in Diabetic vs Non-Diabetic and Associated Pathogens
Introduction Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in low socioeconomic country like Pakistan. There are various factors responsible for UTI, one major factor being diabetes. This study aims to compare diabetic and non-diabetic patients, for gender association, symptoms, and organisms, with UTI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094044 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10500 |
_version_ | 1783597199016329216 |
---|---|
author | Ramrakhia, Sonam Raja, Kunal Dev, Kapeel Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Vinesh Kumar, Besham |
author_facet | Ramrakhia, Sonam Raja, Kunal Dev, Kapeel Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Vinesh Kumar, Besham |
author_sort | Ramrakhia, Sonam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in low socioeconomic country like Pakistan. There are various factors responsible for UTI, one major factor being diabetes. This study aims to compare diabetic and non-diabetic patients, for gender association, symptoms, and organisms, with UTI. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in the medicine ward of tertiary care hospital in Pakistan from January 2019 to December 2019. For urine analysis, freshly voided 5-10 ml of clean midstream urine specimens was collected in a sterile container. Samples were sent to the lab immediately, A colony count of ≥10(5 )CFU/ml was considered for the diagnosis of UTI. Culture was done if UTI was diagnosed. Results The overall incidence of UTI in participants of the diabetic group was significantly higher than those in the non-diabetic group (13.67% vs 6.40%; P=0.004). Escherichia coli was the most common organism in both the diabetic and non-diabetic groups (60% vs 72%; P=0.73). Frequency of Klebsiella was considerably higher in the participants of diabetes but it was not significant (23.3% vs 11.1%; P=0.29). Conclusion UTI was significantly higher in the diabetic population compared to the non-diabetic population. Since diabetes is prevalent in Pakistan, care of diabetes should include reducing the risk factors for UTI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7571591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75715912020-10-21 Comparison of Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection in Diabetic vs Non-Diabetic and Associated Pathogens Ramrakhia, Sonam Raja, Kunal Dev, Kapeel Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Vinesh Kumar, Besham Cureus Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism Introduction Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in low socioeconomic country like Pakistan. There are various factors responsible for UTI, one major factor being diabetes. This study aims to compare diabetic and non-diabetic patients, for gender association, symptoms, and organisms, with UTI. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in the medicine ward of tertiary care hospital in Pakistan from January 2019 to December 2019. For urine analysis, freshly voided 5-10 ml of clean midstream urine specimens was collected in a sterile container. Samples were sent to the lab immediately, A colony count of ≥10(5 )CFU/ml was considered for the diagnosis of UTI. Culture was done if UTI was diagnosed. Results The overall incidence of UTI in participants of the diabetic group was significantly higher than those in the non-diabetic group (13.67% vs 6.40%; P=0.004). Escherichia coli was the most common organism in both the diabetic and non-diabetic groups (60% vs 72%; P=0.73). Frequency of Klebsiella was considerably higher in the participants of diabetes but it was not significant (23.3% vs 11.1%; P=0.29). Conclusion UTI was significantly higher in the diabetic population compared to the non-diabetic population. Since diabetes is prevalent in Pakistan, care of diabetes should include reducing the risk factors for UTI. Cureus 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7571591/ /pubmed/33094044 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10500 Text en Copyright © 2020, Ramrakhia et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism Ramrakhia, Sonam Raja, Kunal Dev, Kapeel Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Vinesh Kumar, Besham Comparison of Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection in Diabetic vs Non-Diabetic and Associated Pathogens |
title | Comparison of Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection in Diabetic vs Non-Diabetic and Associated Pathogens |
title_full | Comparison of Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection in Diabetic vs Non-Diabetic and Associated Pathogens |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection in Diabetic vs Non-Diabetic and Associated Pathogens |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection in Diabetic vs Non-Diabetic and Associated Pathogens |
title_short | Comparison of Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection in Diabetic vs Non-Diabetic and Associated Pathogens |
title_sort | comparison of incidence of urinary tract infection in diabetic vs non-diabetic and associated pathogens |
topic | Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094044 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10500 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramrakhiasonam comparisonofincidenceofurinarytractinfectionindiabeticvsnondiabeticandassociatedpathogens AT rajakunal comparisonofincidenceofurinarytractinfectionindiabeticvsnondiabeticandassociatedpathogens AT devkapeel comparisonofincidenceofurinarytractinfectionindiabeticvsnondiabeticandassociatedpathogens AT kumarajay comparisonofincidenceofurinarytractinfectionindiabeticvsnondiabeticandassociatedpathogens AT kumarvinesh comparisonofincidenceofurinarytractinfectionindiabeticvsnondiabeticandassociatedpathogens AT kumarbesham comparisonofincidenceofurinarytractinfectionindiabeticvsnondiabeticandassociatedpathogens |