Cargando…

Factors Affecting Patient Decision-Making Regarding Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Treatment

Introduction Midshaft clavicle fractures are a common problem encountered by orthopedic surgeons. There remains debate between non-surgical and surgical treatment options for certain midshaft clavicle fractures. Due to the lack of a clear treatment strategy, this presents an opportunity for shared d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medina Perez, Giancarlo, Tran, Megan M, McDonald, Christopher, O'Donnell, Ryan, Cruz, Jr., Aristides I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094047
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10505
_version_ 1783597201571708928
author Medina Perez, Giancarlo
Tran, Megan M
McDonald, Christopher
O'Donnell, Ryan
Cruz, Jr., Aristides I
author_facet Medina Perez, Giancarlo
Tran, Megan M
McDonald, Christopher
O'Donnell, Ryan
Cruz, Jr., Aristides I
author_sort Medina Perez, Giancarlo
collection PubMed
description Introduction Midshaft clavicle fractures are a common problem encountered by orthopedic surgeons. There remains debate between non-surgical and surgical treatment options for certain midshaft clavicle fractures. Due to the lack of a clear treatment strategy, this presents an opportunity for shared decision-making, which has been shown to be important to patients. Methods A 19-question survey was created encompassing basic demographic information, then taking respondents through a simulation of a midshaft clavicle fracture patient encounter. Subjects were subsequently asked their preferred treatment choice as well as shared decision-making preferences for the simulated encounter. A pilot study was performed with medical students from our home institution to assess study sample size. The survey was then distributed through an online software platform (Amazon Mechanical Turk). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA, Microsoft Excel, and Qualtrics. Results 253 subjects responded to the online survey. Over 70% of respondents had no to minimal knowledge of clavicle fractures and potential medical interventions/treatments. 67.6% of respondents preferred shared decision-making, over autonomous or paternalistic models. 45.5% of respondents wanted additional time outside the physician-patient consultation before making a treatment decision. A majority of the respondents who selected surgery (44.3%; 43/97) and no surgery (69.9%; 109/156), based their decisions on outcomes data provided in the simulation alone. There was no statistically significant relationship between income, race/ethnicity, education level, work status, sex, or type of visual fracture representation (i.e., radiograph vs. cartoon image) and treatment decision (p>0.05). Younger age (p=0.007) and being married (p=0.001) were associated with increased likelihood to select surgery as the treatment decision.  Conclusion Most respondents had no-to-minimal knowledge about clavicle fractures, placed a high value in shared decision-making for midshaft clavicle fractures, and prioritized outcomes data in making treatment decisions. Younger age and marital status may increase the likelihood of a patient selecting to proceed with surgery over non-operative treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7571605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75716052020-10-21 Factors Affecting Patient Decision-Making Regarding Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Treatment Medina Perez, Giancarlo Tran, Megan M McDonald, Christopher O'Donnell, Ryan Cruz, Jr., Aristides I Cureus Medical Simulation Introduction Midshaft clavicle fractures are a common problem encountered by orthopedic surgeons. There remains debate between non-surgical and surgical treatment options for certain midshaft clavicle fractures. Due to the lack of a clear treatment strategy, this presents an opportunity for shared decision-making, which has been shown to be important to patients. Methods A 19-question survey was created encompassing basic demographic information, then taking respondents through a simulation of a midshaft clavicle fracture patient encounter. Subjects were subsequently asked their preferred treatment choice as well as shared decision-making preferences for the simulated encounter. A pilot study was performed with medical students from our home institution to assess study sample size. The survey was then distributed through an online software platform (Amazon Mechanical Turk). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA, Microsoft Excel, and Qualtrics. Results 253 subjects responded to the online survey. Over 70% of respondents had no to minimal knowledge of clavicle fractures and potential medical interventions/treatments. 67.6% of respondents preferred shared decision-making, over autonomous or paternalistic models. 45.5% of respondents wanted additional time outside the physician-patient consultation before making a treatment decision. A majority of the respondents who selected surgery (44.3%; 43/97) and no surgery (69.9%; 109/156), based their decisions on outcomes data provided in the simulation alone. There was no statistically significant relationship between income, race/ethnicity, education level, work status, sex, or type of visual fracture representation (i.e., radiograph vs. cartoon image) and treatment decision (p>0.05). Younger age (p=0.007) and being married (p=0.001) were associated with increased likelihood to select surgery as the treatment decision.  Conclusion Most respondents had no-to-minimal knowledge about clavicle fractures, placed a high value in shared decision-making for midshaft clavicle fractures, and prioritized outcomes data in making treatment decisions. Younger age and marital status may increase the likelihood of a patient selecting to proceed with surgery over non-operative treatment. Cureus 2020-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7571605/ /pubmed/33094047 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10505 Text en Copyright © 2020, Medina Perez et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Simulation
Medina Perez, Giancarlo
Tran, Megan M
McDonald, Christopher
O'Donnell, Ryan
Cruz, Jr., Aristides I
Factors Affecting Patient Decision-Making Regarding Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Treatment
title Factors Affecting Patient Decision-Making Regarding Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Treatment
title_full Factors Affecting Patient Decision-Making Regarding Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Treatment
title_fullStr Factors Affecting Patient Decision-Making Regarding Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Factors Affecting Patient Decision-Making Regarding Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Treatment
title_short Factors Affecting Patient Decision-Making Regarding Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Treatment
title_sort factors affecting patient decision-making regarding midshaft clavicle fracture treatment
topic Medical Simulation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094047
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10505
work_keys_str_mv AT medinaperezgiancarlo factorsaffectingpatientdecisionmakingregardingmidshaftclaviclefracturetreatment
AT tranmeganm factorsaffectingpatientdecisionmakingregardingmidshaftclaviclefracturetreatment
AT mcdonaldchristopher factorsaffectingpatientdecisionmakingregardingmidshaftclaviclefracturetreatment
AT odonnellryan factorsaffectingpatientdecisionmakingregardingmidshaftclaviclefracturetreatment
AT cruzjraristidesi factorsaffectingpatientdecisionmakingregardingmidshaftclaviclefracturetreatment