Cargando…

Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation

OBJECTIVES: In this study, localization accuracy and sensitivity to acoustic interaural time differences (ITDs) in subjects using cochlear implants with combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) were assessed and compared with the results of a normal hearing control group. METHODS: Eight CI users...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Körtje, Monika, Baumann, Uwe, Stöver, Timo, Weissgerber, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33075114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241015
_version_ 1783597204630405120
author Körtje, Monika
Baumann, Uwe
Stöver, Timo
Weissgerber, Tobias
author_facet Körtje, Monika
Baumann, Uwe
Stöver, Timo
Weissgerber, Tobias
author_sort Körtje, Monika
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In this study, localization accuracy and sensitivity to acoustic interaural time differences (ITDs) in subjects using cochlear implants with combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) were assessed and compared with the results of a normal hearing control group. METHODS: Eight CI users with EAS (2 bilaterally implanted, 6 unilaterally implanted) and symmetric binaural acoustic hearing and 24 normal hearing subjects participated in the study. The first experiment determined mean localization error (MLE) for different angles of sound incidence between ± 60° (frontal and dorsal presentation). The stimuli were either low-pass, high-pass or broadband noise bursts. In a second experiment, just noticeable differences (JND) of ITDs were measured for pure tones of 125 Hz, 250 Hz and 500 Hz (headphone presentation). RESULTS: Experiment 1: MLE of EAS subjects was 8.5°, 14.3° and 14.7°, (low-, high-pass and broadband stimuli respectively). In the control group, MLE was 1.8° (broadband stimuli). In the differentiation between sound incidence from front and back, EAS subjects performed on chance level. Experiment 2: The JND-ITDs were 88.7 μs for 125 Hz, 48.8 μs for 250 Hz and 52.9 μs for 500 Hz (EAS subjects). Compared to the control group, JND-ITD for 125 Hz was on the same level of performance. No statistically significant correlation was found between MLE and JND-ITD in the EAS cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Near to normal ITD sensitivity in the lower frequency acoustic hearing was demonstrated in a cohort of EAS users. However, in an acoustic localization task, the majority of the subjects did not reached the level of accuracy of normal hearing. Presumably, signal processing time delay differences between devices used on both sides are deteriorating the transfer of precise binaural timing cues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7571672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75716722020-10-26 Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation Körtje, Monika Baumann, Uwe Stöver, Timo Weissgerber, Tobias PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: In this study, localization accuracy and sensitivity to acoustic interaural time differences (ITDs) in subjects using cochlear implants with combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) were assessed and compared with the results of a normal hearing control group. METHODS: Eight CI users with EAS (2 bilaterally implanted, 6 unilaterally implanted) and symmetric binaural acoustic hearing and 24 normal hearing subjects participated in the study. The first experiment determined mean localization error (MLE) for different angles of sound incidence between ± 60° (frontal and dorsal presentation). The stimuli were either low-pass, high-pass or broadband noise bursts. In a second experiment, just noticeable differences (JND) of ITDs were measured for pure tones of 125 Hz, 250 Hz and 500 Hz (headphone presentation). RESULTS: Experiment 1: MLE of EAS subjects was 8.5°, 14.3° and 14.7°, (low-, high-pass and broadband stimuli respectively). In the control group, MLE was 1.8° (broadband stimuli). In the differentiation between sound incidence from front and back, EAS subjects performed on chance level. Experiment 2: The JND-ITDs were 88.7 μs for 125 Hz, 48.8 μs for 250 Hz and 52.9 μs for 500 Hz (EAS subjects). Compared to the control group, JND-ITD for 125 Hz was on the same level of performance. No statistically significant correlation was found between MLE and JND-ITD in the EAS cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Near to normal ITD sensitivity in the lower frequency acoustic hearing was demonstrated in a cohort of EAS users. However, in an acoustic localization task, the majority of the subjects did not reached the level of accuracy of normal hearing. Presumably, signal processing time delay differences between devices used on both sides are deteriorating the transfer of precise binaural timing cues. Public Library of Science 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7571672/ /pubmed/33075114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241015 Text en © 2020 Körtje et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Körtje, Monika
Baumann, Uwe
Stöver, Timo
Weissgerber, Tobias
Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation
title Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation
title_full Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation
title_fullStr Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation
title_short Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation
title_sort sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33075114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241015
work_keys_str_mv AT kortjemonika sensitivitytointerauraltimedifferencesandlocalizationaccuracyincochlearimplantuserswithcombinedelectricacousticstimulation
AT baumannuwe sensitivitytointerauraltimedifferencesandlocalizationaccuracyincochlearimplantuserswithcombinedelectricacousticstimulation
AT stovertimo sensitivitytointerauraltimedifferencesandlocalizationaccuracyincochlearimplantuserswithcombinedelectricacousticstimulation
AT weissgerbertobias sensitivitytointerauraltimedifferencesandlocalizationaccuracyincochlearimplantuserswithcombinedelectricacousticstimulation