Cargando…
The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line
Humans and animals are capable of estimating and discriminating nonsymbolic numerosities via mental representation of magnitudes—the approximate number system (ANS). There are two models of the ANS system, which are similar in their prediction in numerosity discrimination tasks. The log-Gaussian mod...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33078378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02140-w |
_version_ | 1783597219967926272 |
---|---|
author | Katzin, Naama Rosenbaum, David Usher, Marius |
author_facet | Katzin, Naama Rosenbaum, David Usher, Marius |
author_sort | Katzin, Naama |
collection | PubMed |
description | Humans and animals are capable of estimating and discriminating nonsymbolic numerosities via mental representation of magnitudes—the approximate number system (ANS). There are two models of the ANS system, which are similar in their prediction in numerosity discrimination tasks. The log-Gaussian model, which assumes numerosities are represented on a compressed logarithmic scale, and the scalar variability model, which assumes numerosities are represented on a linear scale. In the first experiment of this paper, we contrasted these models using averaging of numerosities. We examined whether participants generate a compressed mean (i.e., geometric mean) or a linear mean when averaging two numerosities. Our results demonstrated that half of the participants are linear and half are compressed; however, in general, the compression is milder than a logarithmic compression. In Experiments 2 and 3, we examined averaging of numerosities in sequences larger than two. We found that averaging precision increases with sequence length. These results are in line with previous findings, suggesting a mechanism in which the estimate is generated by population averaging of the responses each stimulus generates on the numerosity representation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13414-020-02140-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7571790 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75717902020-10-20 The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line Katzin, Naama Rosenbaum, David Usher, Marius Atten Percept Psychophys Article Humans and animals are capable of estimating and discriminating nonsymbolic numerosities via mental representation of magnitudes—the approximate number system (ANS). There are two models of the ANS system, which are similar in their prediction in numerosity discrimination tasks. The log-Gaussian model, which assumes numerosities are represented on a compressed logarithmic scale, and the scalar variability model, which assumes numerosities are represented on a linear scale. In the first experiment of this paper, we contrasted these models using averaging of numerosities. We examined whether participants generate a compressed mean (i.e., geometric mean) or a linear mean when averaging two numerosities. Our results demonstrated that half of the participants are linear and half are compressed; however, in general, the compression is milder than a logarithmic compression. In Experiments 2 and 3, we examined averaging of numerosities in sequences larger than two. We found that averaging precision increases with sequence length. These results are in line with previous findings, suggesting a mechanism in which the estimate is generated by population averaging of the responses each stimulus generates on the numerosity representation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13414-020-02140-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-10-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7571790/ /pubmed/33078378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02140-w Text en © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Katzin, Naama Rosenbaum, David Usher, Marius The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line |
title | The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line |
title_full | The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line |
title_fullStr | The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line |
title_full_unstemmed | The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line |
title_short | The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line |
title_sort | averaging of numerosities: a psychometric investigation of the mental line |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33078378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02140-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katzinnaama theaveragingofnumerositiesapsychometricinvestigationofthementalline AT rosenbaumdavid theaveragingofnumerositiesapsychometricinvestigationofthementalline AT ushermarius theaveragingofnumerositiesapsychometricinvestigationofthementalline AT katzinnaama averagingofnumerositiesapsychometricinvestigationofthementalline AT rosenbaumdavid averagingofnumerositiesapsychometricinvestigationofthementalline AT ushermarius averagingofnumerositiesapsychometricinvestigationofthementalline |