Cargando…

The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line

Humans and animals are capable of estimating and discriminating nonsymbolic numerosities via mental representation of magnitudes—the approximate number system (ANS). There are two models of the ANS system, which are similar in their prediction in numerosity discrimination tasks. The log-Gaussian mod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katzin, Naama, Rosenbaum, David, Usher, Marius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33078378
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02140-w
_version_ 1783597219967926272
author Katzin, Naama
Rosenbaum, David
Usher, Marius
author_facet Katzin, Naama
Rosenbaum, David
Usher, Marius
author_sort Katzin, Naama
collection PubMed
description Humans and animals are capable of estimating and discriminating nonsymbolic numerosities via mental representation of magnitudes—the approximate number system (ANS). There are two models of the ANS system, which are similar in their prediction in numerosity discrimination tasks. The log-Gaussian model, which assumes numerosities are represented on a compressed logarithmic scale, and the scalar variability model, which assumes numerosities are represented on a linear scale. In the first experiment of this paper, we contrasted these models using averaging of numerosities. We examined whether participants generate a compressed mean (i.e., geometric mean) or a linear mean when averaging two numerosities. Our results demonstrated that half of the participants are linear and half are compressed; however, in general, the compression is milder than a logarithmic compression. In Experiments 2 and 3, we examined averaging of numerosities in sequences larger than two. We found that averaging precision increases with sequence length. These results are in line with previous findings, suggesting a mechanism in which the estimate is generated by population averaging of the responses each stimulus generates on the numerosity representation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13414-020-02140-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7571790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75717902020-10-20 The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line Katzin, Naama Rosenbaum, David Usher, Marius Atten Percept Psychophys Article Humans and animals are capable of estimating and discriminating nonsymbolic numerosities via mental representation of magnitudes—the approximate number system (ANS). There are two models of the ANS system, which are similar in their prediction in numerosity discrimination tasks. The log-Gaussian model, which assumes numerosities are represented on a compressed logarithmic scale, and the scalar variability model, which assumes numerosities are represented on a linear scale. In the first experiment of this paper, we contrasted these models using averaging of numerosities. We examined whether participants generate a compressed mean (i.e., geometric mean) or a linear mean when averaging two numerosities. Our results demonstrated that half of the participants are linear and half are compressed; however, in general, the compression is milder than a logarithmic compression. In Experiments 2 and 3, we examined averaging of numerosities in sequences larger than two. We found that averaging precision increases with sequence length. These results are in line with previous findings, suggesting a mechanism in which the estimate is generated by population averaging of the responses each stimulus generates on the numerosity representation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13414-020-02140-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-10-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7571790/ /pubmed/33078378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02140-w Text en © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Katzin, Naama
Rosenbaum, David
Usher, Marius
The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line
title The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line
title_full The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line
title_fullStr The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line
title_full_unstemmed The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line
title_short The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line
title_sort averaging of numerosities: a psychometric investigation of the mental line
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33078378
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02140-w
work_keys_str_mv AT katzinnaama theaveragingofnumerositiesapsychometricinvestigationofthementalline
AT rosenbaumdavid theaveragingofnumerositiesapsychometricinvestigationofthementalline
AT ushermarius theaveragingofnumerositiesapsychometricinvestigationofthementalline
AT katzinnaama averagingofnumerositiesapsychometricinvestigationofthementalline
AT rosenbaumdavid averagingofnumerositiesapsychometricinvestigationofthementalline
AT ushermarius averagingofnumerositiesapsychometricinvestigationofthementalline